Example of Theory and Decision format
Recent searches

Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format Example of Theory and Decision format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Theory and Decision — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Social Sciences (all) #78 of 260 up up by 2 ranks
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all) #79 of 243 down down by 18 ranks
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) #139 of 306 up up by 20 ranks
Developmental and Educational Psychology #201 of 332 up up by 8 ranks
Computer Science Applications #455 of 693 down down by 77 ranks
Decision Sciences (all) #25 of 37 up up by 2 ranks
Applied Psychology #153 of 227 up up by 4 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 202 Published Papers | 325 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 17/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.5
SJR: 0.641
SNIP: 1.243
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.1
SJR: 0.503
SNIP: 1.076
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.8
SJR: 0.815
SNIP: 1.54
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Elsevier

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.8
SJR: 0.91
SNIP: 2.575

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

0.798

17% from 2018

Impact factor for Theory and Decision from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 0.798
2018 0.68
2017 0.522
2016 0.606
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.6

14% from 2019

CiteRatio for Theory and Decision from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.6
2019 1.4
2018 1.2
2017 1.2
2016 1.2
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 17% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 14% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.602

23% from 2019

SJR for Theory and Decision from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.602
2019 0.779
2018 0.929
2017 0.583
2016 0.558
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.148

26% from 2019

SNIP for Theory and Decision from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.148
2019 0.912
2018 0.629
2017 0.782
2016 0.754
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 23% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 26% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Theory and Decision

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Theory and Decision

The field of decision has been investigated from many sides. However, research programs relevant to decision making in psychology, management science, economics, the theory of games, statistics, operations research, artificial intelligence, cognitive science and analytical phi...... Read More

Economics, Econometrics and Finance

i
Last updated on
17 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0040-5833
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.889
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF00134132
The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods
Bernard Roy1
01 Jul 1991 - Theory and Decision

Abstract:

In the first part of this paper, we describe the main features of real-world problems for which the outranking approach is appropriate and we present the concept of outranking relations. The second part is devoted to basic ideas and concepts used for building outranking relations. The definition of such outranking relations i... In the first part of this paper, we describe the main features of real-world problems for which the outranking approach is appropriate and we present the concept of outranking relations. The second part is devoted to basic ideas and concepts used for building outranking relations. The definition of such outranking relations is given for the main ELECTRE methods in Part 3. The final part of the paper is devoted to some practical considerations. read more read less

Topics:

ELECTRE (62%)62% related to the paper
1,622 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF00133443
The structure of random utility models
Charles F. Manski1
01 Jul 1977 - Theory and Decision

Abstract:

I am grateful to Joseph B. Kadane for numerous constructive suggestions offered during discussions of this research. The financial sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation through grant DOT-OS-4006 is also acknowledged. The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author. I am grateful to Joseph B. Kadane for numerous constructive suggestions offered during discussions of this research. The financial sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation through grant DOT-OS-4006 is also acknowledged. The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author. read more read less

Topics:

Constructive (57%)57% related to the paper
1,544 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF00148991
Counterintuitive behavior of social systems
Jay W. Forrester1
01 Jan 1971 - Theory and Decision

Abstract:

This paper addresses several issues of broad concern in the United States: population trends; the quality of urban life; national policy for urban growth; and the unexpected, ineffective, or detrimental results often generated by government programs in these areas. The author does attempt to indicate how multiloop feed-back s... This paper addresses several issues of broad concern in the United States: population trends; the quality of urban life; national policy for urban growth; and the unexpected, ineffective, or detrimental results often generated by government programs in these areas. The author does attempt to indicate how multiloop feed-back systems (to which our social systems belong) mislead us because our intuition and judgement have been formed to expect behavior different from that actually possessed by such systems. At times programs cause exactly the reverse of desired results. It is now possible to explain how such contrary results can happen. There are fundamental reasons why people misjudge the behavior of social systems. There are orderly processes at work that frequently lead people to wrong decisions when faced with complex and highly interacting systems. Until we come to a much better understanding of social systems, we should expect that attempts to develop corrective programs will continue to disappoint us. read more read less

Topics:

Population (54%)54% related to the paper
660 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF00125672
Thirteen theorems in search of the truth
Bernard Grofman1, Bernard Grofman2, Guillermo Owen2, Guillermo Owen1, Scott L. Feld1, Scott L. Feld2
01 Sep 1983 - Theory and Decision

Abstract:

We review recent work on the accuracy of group judgmental processes as a function of (a) the competences (judgmental accuracies) of individual group members, (b) the group decision procedure, and (c) group size. This work on individual competence and group accuracy represents an important contribution to democratic theory and... We review recent work on the accuracy of group judgmental processes as a function of (a) the competences (judgmental accuracies) of individual group members, (b) the group decision procedure, and (c) group size. This work on individual competence and group accuracy represents an important contribution to democratic theory and a useful complement to the usual emphasis in the social choice literature on individual preference and preference aggregation mechanisms. The work reported on is rooted in a tradition which goes back to scholars such as Condorcet, Poisson, and Bayes. read more read less

Topics:

Group decision-making (59%)59% related to the paper, Condorcet's jury theorem (54%)54% related to the paper, Social choice theory (53%)53% related to the paper, Aggregation problem (50%)50% related to the paper, Condorcet method (50%)50% related to the paper
346 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF00129168
Consequentialist foundations for expected utility
Peter J. Hammond1
01 Jul 1988 - Theory and Decision

Abstract:

Behaviour norms are considered for decision trees which allow both objective probabilities and uncertain states of the world with unknown probabilities. Terminal nodes have consequences in a given domain. Behaviour is required to be consistent in subtrees. Consequentialist behaviour, by definition, reveals a consequence choic... Behaviour norms are considered for decision trees which allow both objective probabilities and uncertain states of the world with unknown probabilities. Terminal nodes have consequences in a given domain. Behaviour is required to be consistent in subtrees. Consequentialist behaviour, by definition, reveals a consequence choice function independent of the structure of the decision tree. It implies that behaviour reveals a revealed preference ordering satisfying both the independence axiom and a novel form of sure-thing principle. Continuous consequentialist behaviour must be expected utility maximizing. Other plausible assumptions then imply additive utilities, subjective probabilities, and Bayes' rule. read more read less

Topics:

Axiom independence (56%)56% related to the paper, Expected utility hypothesis (55%)55% related to the paper, Decision theory (54%)54% related to the paper, Choice function (53%)53% related to the paper, Decision tree (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
344 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Theory and Decision.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Theory and Decision format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Theory and Decision in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Theory and Decision guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Theory and Decision guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Theory and Decision guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Theory and Decision?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Theory and Decision citation style.

4. Can I use the Theory and Decision templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Theory and Decision.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Theory and Decision that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Theory and Decision that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Theory and Decision?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Theory and Decision.

7. Where can I find the template for the Theory and Decision?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Theory and Decision's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Theory and Decision's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Theory and Decision an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Theory and Decision is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Theory and Decision?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Theory and Decision?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Theory and Decision?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Theory and Decision, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Theory and Decision's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Theory and Decision?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Theory and Decision. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Theory and Decision?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Theory and Decision are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Theory and Decision?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Theory and Decision's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Theory and Decision in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Theory and Decision Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Theory and Decision formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template