Institution
American Society of Clinical Oncology
Healthcare•Alexandria, Virginia, United States•
About: American Society of Clinical Oncology is a healthcare organization based out in Alexandria, Virginia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Guideline & Cancer. The organization has 670 authors who have published 813 publications receiving 92135 citations. The organization is also known as: ASCO.
Topics: Guideline, Cancer, Breast cancer, MEDLINE, Clinical trial
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: A testing algorithm that relies on accurate, reproducible assay performance, including newly available types of brightfield ISH, is proposed and strongly recommends validation of laboratory assay or modifications, use of standardized operating procedures, and compliance with new testing criteria to be monitored.
Abstract: Purpose To develop a guideline to improve the accuracy of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in invasive breast cancer and its utility as a predictive marker. Methods The American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel, which conducted a systematic review of the literature and developed recommendations for optimal HER2 testing performance. The guideline was reviewed by selected experts and approved by the board of directors for both organizations. Results Approximately 20% of current HER2 testing may be inaccurate. When carefully validated testing is performed, available data do not clearly demonstrate the superiority of either immunohistochemistry (IHC) or in situ hybridization (ISH) as a predictor of benefit from anti-HER2 therapy. Recommendations The panel recommends that HER2 status should be determined for all invasive breast cancer. A testing algorithm that relies on accurate, reproducible assay performance, including newly...
4,560 citations
University of Utah1, University of Michigan2, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust3, Ohio State University4, Indiana University5, St. Jude Medical Center6, University of Queensland7, Beaumont Hospital8, BC Cancer Agency9, University of Rochester10, Harvard University11, American Society of Clinical Oncology12, National Institutes of Health13, Baylor College of Medicine14, Sungkyunkwan University15, University of the West of England16, Tohoku University17, Radboud University Nijmegen18, University of Toronto19, Saint Joseph Mercy Health System20, Mayo Clinic21, University of Washington22, Memorial Hospital of South Bend23, University of Texas at Austin24, Johns Hopkins University25
TL;DR: An international Expert Panel that conducted a systematic review and evaluation of the literature and developed recommendations for optimal IHC ER/PgR testing performance recommended that ER and PgR status be determined on all invasive breast cancers and breast cancer recurrences.
Abstract: Purpose To develop a guideline to improve the accuracy of immunohistochemical (IHC) estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) testing in breast cancer and the utility of these receptors as predictive markers. Methods The American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists convened an international Expert Panel that conducted a systematic review and evaluation of the literature in partnership with Cancer Care Ontario and developed recommendations for optimal IHC ER/PgR testing performance. Results Up to 20% of current IHC determinations of ER and PgR testing worldwide may be inaccurate (false negative or false positive). Most of the issues with testing have occurred because of variation in preanalytic variables, thresholds for positivity, and interpretation criteria. Recommendations The Panel recommends that ER and PgR status be determined on all invasive breast cancers and breast cancer recurrences. A testing algorithm that relies on accurate, reproducible assay performance is proposed. Elements to reliably reduce assay variation are specified. It is recommended that ER and PgR assays be considered positive if there are at least 1% positive tumor nuclei in the sample on testing in the presence of expected reactivity of internal (normal epithelial elements) and external controls. The absence of benefit from endocrine therapy for women with ER-negative invasive breast cancers has been confirmed in large overviews of randomized clinical trials.
3,902 citations
Johns Hopkins University1, University of Utah2, University of Rochester3, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust4, National Institutes of Health5, Stanford University6, Washington University in St. Louis7, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research8, University of Sydney9, St. Jude Medical Center10, University of Toronto11, Mayo Clinic12, American Society of Clinical Oncology13, University of Southern California14, North Carolina State University15, Indiana University16, University of Milan17, University of Michigan18
TL;DR: The Update Committee recommends that HER2 status (HER2 negative or positive) be determined in all patients with invasive breast cancer on the basis of one or more HER2 test results (negative, equivocal, or positive).
Abstract: Purpose
To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing and its utility as a predictive marker in invasive breast cancer.
2,934 citations
Johns Hopkins University1, University of Utah2, University of Rochester3, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust4, National Institutes of Health5, Stanford University6, Washington University in St. Louis7, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research8, University of Sydney9, St. Jude Medical Center10, University of Toronto11, Mayo Clinic12, American Society of Clinical Oncology13, University of Southern California14, North Carolina State University15, Indiana University16, University of Milan17, University of Michigan18
TL;DR: The Update Committee recommends that HER2 status (HER2 negative or positive) be determined in all patients with invasive breast cancer on the basis of one or more HER2 test results (negative, equivocal, or positive).
Abstract: Purpose.—To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in b...
2,817 citations
TL;DR: This revision of the staging system for cutaneous melanoma will become official with publication of the sixth edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual in the year 2002.
Abstract: PURPOSE: To revise the staging system for cutaneous melanoma under the auspices of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prognostic factors analysis described in the companion publication (this issue), as well as evidence from the published literature, was used to assemble the tumor-node-metastasis criteria and stage grouping for the melanoma staging system. RESULTS: Major changes include (1) melanoma thickness and ulceration but not level of invasion to be used in the T category (except for T1 melanomas); (2) the number of metastatic lymph nodes rather than their gross dimensions and the delineation of clinically occult (ie, microscopic) versus clinically apparent (ie, macroscopic) nodal metastases to be used in the N category; (3) the site of distant metastases and the presence of elevated serum lactic dehydrogenase to be used in the M category; (4) an upstaging of all patients with stage I, II, and III disease when a primary melanoma is ulcerated; (5) a merging of sa...
2,623 citations
Authors
Showing all 672 results
| Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth C. Anderson | 178 | 1138 | 126072 |
| Jane A. Cauley | 151 | 914 | 99933 |
| Howard I. Scher | 151 | 944 | 101737 |
| Thomas J. Smith | 140 | 1775 | 113919 |
| Eric P. Winer | 139 | 751 | 71587 |
| Paul T. Costa | 133 | 406 | 88454 |
| John F. Thompson | 132 | 1420 | 95894 |
| Richard D. Gelber | 127 | 467 | 81399 |
| Mark G. Kris | 125 | 681 | 77596 |
| Leonard B. Saltz | 122 | 545 | 52829 |
| Kenneth Offit | 122 | 576 | 46548 |
| Patricia A. Ganz | 120 | 701 | 57204 |
| Robert C. Bast | 119 | 654 | 65719 |
| George D. Demetri | 118 | 567 | 67244 |
| Razelle Kurzrock | 118 | 1121 | 56594 |