Center for Global Development

About: Center for Global Development is a nonprofit organization based out in Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Poverty & Population. The organization has 1472 authors who have published 3891 publications receiving 162325 citations.

Disaster risk reduction in developing countries: costs, benefits and institutions

Abstract: Some 60,000 people worldwide die annually in natural disasters, mostly due to the collapse of buildings in earthquakes, and primarily in the developing world. This is despite the fact that engineering solutions exist that can eliminate almost completely the risk of such deaths. Why is this? The solutions are expensive and technically demanding, so their cost-benefit ratio often is unfavourable as compared to other interventions. Nonetheless, there are various public disaster risk reduction interventions that are highly cost-effective. That such interventions frequently remain unimplemented or ineffectively executed points to a role for issues of political economy. Building regulations in developing countries appear to have limited impact in many cases, perhaps because of inadequate capacity and corruption. Public construction often is of low quality, perhaps for similar reasons. This suggests the need for approaches that emphasise simple and limited disaster risk regulation covering only the most at-risk structures-and that, preferably, non-experts can monitor-as well as numerous transparency and oversight mechanisms for public construction projects. Language: en

Deals and Development: The Political Dynamics of Growth Episodes

Abstract: If development is predicated upon sustained economic growth, how can this be achieved? In Deals and Development: The Political Dynamics of Growth Episodes, editors Lant Prichett, Kunal Sen and Eric Werker bring together country experts to examine how businesses have engaged with the state to both constrain and enable growth episodes across ten African and Asian countries. While the book draws on global expertise and actual practices of state-business engagement to superbly illustrate the importance of sustained growth, Alice Evans explores three fundamental questions that the text raises.

Epidemiology and Outcomes of Hospitalizations With Invasive Aspergillosis in the United States, 2009-2013

Abstract: Background Though invasive aspergillosis (IA) complicates care of up to 13% of patients with immunocompromise, little is known about its morbidity and mortality burden in the United States. Methods We analyzed the Health Care Utilization Project's data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality for 2009-2013. Among subjects with high-risk conditions for IA, IA was identified via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes 117.3, 117.9, and 484.6. We compared characteristics and outcomes between those with (IA) and without IA (non-IA). Using propensity score matching, we calculated the IA-associated excess mortality and 30-day readmission rates, length of stay, and costs. Results Of the 66634683 discharged patients meeting study inclusion criteria, 154888 (0.2%) had a diagnosis of IA. The most common high-risk conditions were major surgery (50.1%) in the non-IA and critical illness (41.0%) in the IA group. After propensity score matching, both mortality (odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-1.51) and 30-day readmission (1.39; 1.34-1.45) rates were higher in the IA group. IA was associated with 6.0 (95% confidence interval, 5.7-6.4) excess days in the hospital and $15542 ($13869-$17215) in excess costs per hospitalization. Conclusions Although rare even among high-risk groups, IA is associated with increased hospital mortality and 30-day readmission rates, excess duration of hospitalization, and costs. Given nearly 40000 annual admissions for IA in the United States, the aggregate IA-attributable excess costs may reach $600 million annually.

The economics of effective AIDS treatment in Thailand

Abstract: Introduction: The speed with which Thailand has scaled up public provision of antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been unprecedented, with more than 80000 individuals on treatment at the end of 2006 through Thailand's National Access to Antiretroviral Program for People Living with HIV/AIDS (NAPHA). This paper projects the cost effectiveness, the affordability and the future fiscal burden of NAPHA to the government of Thailand under several different policy scenarios until the year 2025. Methods: An economic/epidemiological model of access to ART was constructed, and this composite model was calibrated to economic and epidemiological data from Thailand and other countries. The economic model adopts the conditional logit specification of demand allocation across multiple treatment modes, and the epidemiological model is a deterministic difference-equation model fitted to the cumulated data on HIV incidence in each risk group. Results: The paper estimates that under 2005 prices NAPHA will save life-years at approximately US$736 per life-year saved with first-line drugs alone and for approximately US$2145 per life-year if second-line drugs are included. Enhancing NAPHA with policies to recruit patients soon after they are first eligible for ART or to enhance their adherence would raise the cost per life-year saved, but the cost would be small per additional life-year saved, and is therefore justifiable. The fiscal burden of a policy including second as well as first-line drugs would be substantial, rising to 23% of the total health budget by 2014, but the authors judge this cost to be affordable given Thailand's strong overall economic performance. The paper estimates that a 90% reduction in the future cost of second-line therapy by the exercise of Thailand's World Trade Organization authority to issue compulsory licences would save the government approximately US$3.2 billion to 2025 and reduce the cost of NAPHA per life-year saved from US$2145 to approximately US$940.

Ragaglitazar: The Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Tolerability of a Novel Dual PPARα and γ Agonist in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract: Ragaglitazar is a novel dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha and gamma agonist intended to restore insulin sensitivity and correct diabetic dyslipidemia. These studies assessed single-dose pharmacokinetics and tolerability of ragaglitazar in healthy subjects, as well as multiple-dose pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of ragaglitazar in healthy subjects and in patients with type 2 diabetes. Healthy subjects received a single oral dose (1-120 mg), and healthy subjects and type 2 diabetic patients received a loading dose and thereafter once-daily doses (0.5-16 mg) of ragaglitazar for 6 and 20 days, respectively. Ragaglitazar was rapidly absorbed (tmax: 1.5-1.7 h), with mean AUC0-24 h and Cmax proportional to dose after single and multiple dosing; t1/2 was 80 hours following a single dose and 104 hours in healthy subjects and 122 hours in patients after multiple dosing. Administration of 4 mg ragaglitazar to patients (n = 4) for 21 days resulted in mean decreases from baseline in fasting levels of plasma glucose (18%), C-peptide (18%), fructosamine (6%), triglycerides (36%), free fatty acids (49%), total cholesterol (11%), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (21%), and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol (15%), as well as an increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (33%). Overall, ragaglitazar was well tolerated; with multiple dosing, there was a higher incidence of adverse events for patients that, at the highest dose level (16 mg), included peripheral edema and anemia.