scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Center for Global Development

NonprofitWashington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
About: Center for Global Development is a nonprofit organization based out in Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Poverty & Population. The organization has 1472 authors who have published 3891 publications receiving 162325 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, discrepancies between administrative data and independent household surveys suggest official statistics systematically exaggerate development progress across multiple African countries, highlighting the need for incentive compatibility between data systems and funding rules.
Abstract: Across multiple African countries, discrepancies between administrative data and independent household surveys suggest official statistics systematically exaggerate development progress. We provide evidence for two distinct explanations of these discrepancies. First, governments misreport to foreign donors, as in the case of a results-based aid program rewarding reported vaccination rates. Second, national governments are themselves misled by frontline service providers, as in the case of primary education, where official enrollment numbers diverged from survey estimates after funding shifted from user fees to per pupil government grants. Both syndromes highlight the need for incentive compatibility between data systems and funding rules.

53 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine the efficacy of different policy tools that external actors might use to change the structure of domestic institutions in target states and reach the following conclusions: contracting often works, coercion sometimes works, and imposition rarely works.
Abstract: The variation in the efficacy of governance-related authority structures is stunning. The focus among scholars primarily on domestic conditions, and only secondarily on the external environment, to explain patterns of political development conforms to the prevailing assumptions of comparativists, international relations scholars, and international lawyers. Over the past decade, however, some scholars have studied the possibility that political institutions within states can be influenced or determined not only by internal factors and the external environment but also by the explicit policies of foreign actors. An emerging body of scholarship examines the efficacy of different policy tools that external actors might use to change the structure of domestic institutions in target states. We review this literature and reach the following conclusions. First, contracting often works, coercion sometimes works, and imposition rarely works. Second, the motivation of initiators matters: to be effective, intervening...

53 citations

Book
02 Sep 2010
TL;DR: The history and geography of global poverty are discussed in this paper, where the authors also discuss the institutional landscape for attacking global poverty and the strategic choices for global poverty eradication in an uncertain world.
Abstract: 1. The History and Geography of Global Poverty 2. Understanding and Explaining Global Poverty 3. The Institutional Landscape for Attacking Global Poverty 4. Doing Global Poverty Eradication: All Change or No Change 5. Strategic Choices for Global Poverty Eradication 6. The Future of Global Poverty: Emerging Issues in an Uncertain World 7. Why Don't we Care About Ending Poverty 8. Moving Forward on Global Poverty: Can we Care?

53 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyzed the productivity performance of both the organised and unorganised segments of the Indian manufacturing sector using unit level data and employed both partial and total factor productivity measures.
Abstract: This paper analyses the productivity performance of both the organised and unorganised segments of the Indian manufacturing sector using unit level data. Both partial and total factor productivity measures are employed. Our analysis reveals that labour productivity has increased for the organised sector over time, whereas both labour productivity and capital intensity growth have slowed down in the unorganised sector during the period between 2000-01 and 2004-05. The improvement in TFP growth in organised manufacturing in the post-2000 period as compared to the second half of the 1990s across most states in India is heartening as also the fact that output growth was mostly productivity-driven in the post-reform period. However, the declining TFP and the increasing capital intensity of the unorganised sector are causes of worry and raise several important questions.

53 citations


Authors

Showing all 1486 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
William Easterly9325349657
Michael Kremer7829429375
George G. Nomikos7020213581
Tommy B. Andersson7021615167
Mark Rounsevell6925320296
David Hulme6932418616
Lant Pritchett6826035341
Jane E. Freedman6534813704
Arvind Subramanian6422020452
Dale Whittington6326510949
Michael Walker6131914864
Sanjeev Gupta5957514306
Joseph C. Cappelleri5948420193
Nathaniel P. Katz5821118483
Anthony Bebbington5724713362
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Erasmus University Rotterdam
91.2K papers, 4.5M citations

83% related

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
185.3K papers, 9.9M citations

80% related

University of London
88K papers, 4M citations

80% related

University of Nottingham
119.6K papers, 4.2M citations

79% related

VU University Amsterdam
75.6K papers, 3.4M citations

79% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20236
202221
2021225
2020202
2019229
2018240