Q2. What causes the depletion of electrolyte in the positive electrode?
Increasing cell current density causes significant depletion of electrolyte in the positive electrode due to consumption in the faradaic reaction.
Q3. What is the main factor for limiting the capacitor performance at high discharge rates?
The significant depletion of electrolyte that develops in the porous electrode phase is another dominant factor for limiting the capacitor performance at high discharge rates.
Q4. What is the effect of increasing the porosity of the electrode?
Increasing the porosity has the simple effect of making the electrolyte more accessible to all the pores within the electrode thereby leading to a decrease in the concentration polarization in the cell.
Q5. How can the authors improve the transport of the electrolyte?
To improve the transportation of the electrolyte, it is necessary to increase the porosity of electrode, which can be accomplished by increasing the carbon content in the electrode.
Q6. What is the primary objective of the present model?
The primary objective of the present model is to study the effect of proton diffusion in the particle on the capacitor performance.
Q7. What is the effect of particle size on the discharge energy density?
With increasing particle size, the discharge energy density falls tremendously and a sharp drop in potential at the start of discharge, which is associated with faradaic kinetic resistance, is observed.
Q8. What is the role of particle size in the performance of the ruO2 cell?
The particle size of oxide is still a critical factor in determining the performance especially at high discharge rates because diffusion in the oxide is the limiting step.
Q9. How is the diffusion coefficient of proton in the oxide?
According to previous studies, it is known that the diffusion coefficient of proton in the oxide is strongly dependent on factors such as oxide annealing temperature, hydration number, and the degree of crystallinity.
Q10. How can The authoruse this model to optimize the composition of the electrode?
Figure 12 demonstrates how this model can be used to optimize the composition of the electrode at discharge rate of 1.5 A/cm2 when different particle sizes of RuO2 and carbon are physically mixed.
Q11. How much energy density can be achieved with RuO2?
When the ratio of RuO2 is 40 wt %, nanosize of particles and high porosity are achieved, generating the highest energy density at 5 kW/kg of power load.
Q12. What is the cost of a supercapacitor?
This data suggests that decreasing the particle size and increasing the porosity of the electrode can reduce the cost of the supercapacitor.
Q13. What is the reason for the low porosity of the electrode?
This simulation result shows that RuO2 alone cannot be used as capacitor electrodes due to its poor rate capability resulting from the low porosity and the large particle size.