scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

A meta-analysis of adverse perinatal outcomes in women with asthma.

TLDR
Please cite this paper as: Murphy V, Namazy J, Powell H, Schatz M, Chambers C, Attia J, Gibson P. A meta‐analysis of adverse perinatal outcomes in women with asthma.
About
This article is published in British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.The article was published on 2011-10-01 and is currently open access. It has received 257 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Wheeze & Asthma.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Xolair Pregnancy Registry (EXPECT): the safety of omalizumab use during pregnancy.

TL;DR: The EXPECT pregnancy registry as mentioned in this paper evaluated maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes after exposure to omalizumab, including incidence of congenital anomalies, including rates of live births, elective terminations, stillbirths, and congenital abnormalities.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of asthma severity, exacerbations and oral corticosteroids on perinatal outcomes

TL;DR: The data suggest that asthma exacerbations, oral corticosteroid use or asthma severity defined as moderate-to-severe may be associated with pre-term delivery, low birth weight, and small for gestational age infants.
Journal ArticleDOI

Air pollution exposure in early pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes : a register-based cohort study

TL;DR: Increased levels of O3 during the first trimester increased the risk of pre-eclampsia and preterm birth, and air pollutants did not exhibit any effects on fetal growth restriction.
References
More filters
Journal Article

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.

TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.
Journal ArticleDOI

Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting

TL;DR: A checklist contains specifications for reporting of meta-analyses of observational studies in epidemiology, including background, search strategy, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion should improve the usefulness ofMeta-an analyses for authors, reviewers, editors, readers, and decision makers.

The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses

TL;DR: The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) as discussed by the authors was developed to assess the quality of nonrandomised studies with its design, content and ease of use directed to the task of incorporating the quality assessments in the interpretation of meta-analytic results.
Journal ArticleDOI

Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates

Douglas G. Altman, +1 more
- 25 Jan 2003 - 
TL;DR: Interference is considered in terms of heterogeneity of treatment effect in subgroups in a randomised trial, such as two age groups, and interaction more generally.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (13)
Q1. What are the contributions in "A meta-analysis of adverse perinatal outcomes in women with asthma running title: adverse perinatal outcomes in women with asthma" ?

A systematic review of the literature and performed meta-analyses of cohort studies to investigate whether maternal asthma is associated with an increased risk of perinatal complications related to size at birth, timing of birth, and maternal preeclampsia in cohort studies this paper. 

Further studies should define optimal management strategies to improve asthma control during pregnancy and prevent exacerbations, with the aim of reducing perinatal complications. In the meantime, despite some heterogeneity, the increased risks demonstrated in these analyses of pregnancies of asthmatic women, suggest that careful medical and obstetric monitoring of the asthmatic mother and her developing baby are warranted. 

Since changes in asthma course during pregnancy can be unpredictable and not always consistent between pregnancies for the same woman 69, it is recommended that women have their asthma monitored at least monthly during pregnancy 70. 

Maternal hypoxia could influence fetal oxygenation 54 with consequences for fetal growth via alterations of placental function 55-61. 

When outcomes were reported in at least 10 studies, Funnel plots and the Egger test were used to investigate study size effects, indicative of possible publication bias (Stata 7). 

It is likely that the heterogeneity is overstated in their meta-analysis compared to traditional meta-analyses due to the very large sample sizes of some of the retrospective cohort studies. 

Hand searching and reference checking of articles was not conducted and it was considered unfeasible to search non-English language publications. 

In addition the authors investigated confounders as contributors to the heterogeneity between studies using meta-regression and in almost all cases there was no change in effect size making it less likely that confounding explains the observations in the current metaanalysis. 

A common pathway leading to hyperactivity of the smooth muscle in both the bronchioles and the myometrium has been proposed to explain the increased incidence of preterm labour in women with asthma 13, 65, 66; a common pathway of mast cell infiltration has been proposed to explain the connection between asthma and pre-eclampsia 67. 

Analysis of data from 3 studies on high birth weight (>4 kg) 6, 16, 46 was supportive of the effect of maternal asthma on fetal growth (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74, 0.96, no heterogeneity). 

If the association between maternal asthma and poor perinatal outcome is indeed real, there are three main explanations could account for the increased risk. 

This subcategory was adequately powered to detect a RR of 2.19 (100% power) as observed in the no active management sub-category. 

English language studies published between 1975 (when inhaled corticosteroids were introduced) and March 2009 were identified for possible inclusion from Medline (n=1642), Embase (n=1755), CINAHL (n=417), and the Cochrane Clinical Trials Register (n=75), using the search terms ((asthma or wheeze) and (pregnan* or perinat* or obstet*)).