Journal ArticleDOI
A Review of Shared Decision-Making and Patient Decision Aids in Radiation Oncology
Kristina D. Woodhouse,Katie Tremont,Anil Vachani,Marilyn M. Schapira,Neha Vapiwala,Charles B. Simone,Abigail T. Berman +6 more
TLDR
An overview of the shared-decision making process is provided and the development, validation, and implementation of decision aids as patient educational tools in radiation oncology are summarized.Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Major Bleeding and Risk of Death after Percutaneous Native Kidney Biopsies: A French Nationwide Cohort Study.
Jean-Michel Halimi,Philippe Gatault,Hélène Longuet,Christelle Barbet,Arnaud Bisson,Bénédicte Sautenet,Julien Herbert,Matthias Büchler,Leslie Grammatico-Guillon,Laurent Fauchier +9 more
TL;DR: The risk of major bleeding after percutaneous native kidney biopsy may be higher than generally thought and is associated with a twofold higher risk of death.
Journal ArticleDOI
Assessment of Use, Specificity, and Readability of Written Clinical Informed Consent Forms for Patients With Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy
Subha Perni,Subha Perni,Michael K. Rooney,David P. Horowitz,Daniel W. Golden,Anne R. McCall,Andrew J. Einstein,Reshma Jagsi +7 more
TL;DR: This nationwide study of informed consent practices for cancer treatment with radiotherapy demonstrates that while all US academic radiotherapy departments use written consent forms, it is rare for templates to meet the recommended readability levels for patient materials.
Journal ArticleDOI
The emerging role of digital health in monitoring and supporting people living with cancer and the consequences of its treatments.
TL;DR: The role of wearables, the internet of things and big data analytics is yet to be fully explored in supportive cancer care and may present new opportunities to enhance care and survivor experience.
Journal ArticleDOI
Examining Interventions Designed to Support Shared Decision Making and Subsequent Patient Outcomes in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
TL;DR: The findings from the studies that examined the effects of the SDM intervention on patient outcomes were inconsistent, highlighting the need for furtherSDM intervention studies among diverse patient populations using consistent measures.
Journal ArticleDOI
Psychiatric service staff perceptions of implementing a shared decision-making tool: a process evaluation study
TL;DR: The results indicate that staff perceived the decision support tool as user-friendly and useful in supporting participation in decision-making, and suggest that such concrete supports to participation can be a factor in implementation if adequate attention is paid to organizational contexts and structures.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
Dawn Stacey,Dawn Stacey,Krystina B. Lewis,Michael J. Barry,Carol Bennett,Karen Eden,Margaret Holmes-Rovner,Hilary A. Llewellyn-Thomas,Anne Lyddiatt,Richard Thomson,Lyndal Trevena +10 more
TL;DR: Decision aids reduced the proportion of undecided participants and appeared to have a positive effect on patient-clinician communication, and those exposed to a decision aid were either equally or more satisfied with their decision, the decision-making process, and the preparation for decision making compared to usual care.
Journal ArticleDOI
Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model.
TL;DR: This revised framework provides a dynamic view of treatment decision-making by recognizing that the approach adopted at the outset of a medical encounter may change as the interaction evolves and has practical applications for clinical practice, research and medical education.
Journal ArticleDOI
Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale
TL;DR: The psychometric properties of a decisional conflict scale (DCS) that elicits health-care consumers' uncertainty in making a health-related decision and the factors contributing to the uncertainty are acceptable.
Journal ArticleDOI
Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process
Glyn Elwyn,Annette M. O'Connor,Dawn Stacey,Robert J. Volk,Adrian Edwards,Angela Coulter,Richard Thomson,Alexandra Barratt,Michael J. Barry,Steven J. Bernstein,Phyllis Butow,Aileen Clarke,Vikki Entwistle,Deb Feldman-Stewart,Margaret Holmes-Rovner,Hilary A. Llewellyn-Thomas,Nora Moumjid,Albert G. Mulley,Cornelia M. Ruland,Karen Sepucha,Alan Sykes,Timothy J. Whelan +21 more
TL;DR: Criteria were given the highest ratings where evidence existed, and these were retained, and developers, users, and purchasers of patient decision aids now have a checklist for appraising quality.
Journal ArticleDOI
Information Needs and Decisional Preferences in Women With Breast Cancer
Lesley F. Degner,Linda J. Kristjanson,David M. Bowman,Jeff A. Sloan,Keumhee C. Carriere,John O’Neil,Barbara Bilodeau,Peter H. Watson,Bryan Mueller +8 more
TL;DR: Priorities for information identified in this study provide an empirical basis to guide communication with women seeking care for breast cancer and suggest systematic approaches to assess and respond to women's desired level of participation in treatment decision making need to be evaluated.