Age Differences in COVID-19 Risk Perceptions and Mental Health: Evidence From a National U.S. Survey Conducted in March 2020.
TLDR
U.S. adults who were relatively older appeared to have a more optimistic outlook and better mental health during the early stages of the pandemic, and interventions may be needed to help people of all ages maintain realistic perceptions of the risks, while also managing depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 crisis.Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: Theories of aging posit that older adult age is associated with less negative emotions, but few studies have examined age differences at times of novel challenges. As COVID-19 spread in the United States, this study therefore aimed to examine age differences in risk perceptions, anxiety and depression. METHOD: In March 2020, a nationally representative address-based sample of 6666 US adults assessed their perceived risk of getting COVID-19, dying if getting it, getting quarantined, losing their job (if currently working), and running out of money. They completed a mental health assessment for anxiety and depression. Demographic variables and pre-crisis depression diagnosis had previously been reported. RESULTS: In regression analyses controlling for demographic variables and survey date, older adult age was associated with perceiving larger risks of dying if getting COVID-19, but with perceiving less risk of getting COVID-19, getting quarantined, or running out of money, as well as less depression and anxiety. Findings held after additionally controlling for pre-crisis reports of depression diagnosis. DISCUSSION: With the exception of perceived infection-fatality risk, US adults who were relatively older appeared to have a more optimistic outlook and better mental health during the early stages of the pandemic. Interventions may be needed to help people of all ages maintain realistic perceptions of the risks, while also managing depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 crisis. Implications for risk communication and mental health interventions are discussed.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Impact of the Coronavirus Disease Pandemic on Mental Health among Local Residents in Korea: a Cross Sectional Study
TL;DR: In this article, a study aimed to evaluate traumatic stress and mental health problems associated with the prolonged coronavirus disease pandemic and to determine the differences across different age groups, finding that 24.7%, 20.9%, 16.8%, and 20.5% of the participants were at high risk for traumatic stress, depression, anxiety, and suicide, respectively.
Journal ArticleDOI
Disentangling the cognitive, physical, and mental health sequelae of COVID-19
TL;DR: In this article , a cross-sectional online study showed that participants who self-reported positive test for COVID-19 (mean = 30 days since most recent test) perform significantly worse than pre-pandemic norms on cognitive measures of processing speed, reasoning, verbal, and overall performance, suggesting domain-specific deficits.
Journal ArticleDOI
Factors related to perceived stress during the COVID-19 epidemic context among the general population in China: A cross-sectional nationwide study.
Jiayao Xu,Xiaomin Wang,Ziming Xuan,Leesa Lin,Kai Sing Sun,Yiyi Zhou,Fangyuan Jiang,Weiqi Han,Xudong Zhou +8 more
TL;DR: Wang et al. as discussed by the authors investigated factors related to high stress levels among the general population in China during the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic when its containment measures were in place and to identify the most stressed populations.
Journal ArticleDOI
People’s understanding of the COVID-19 pandemic: social representations of SARS-CoV-2 virus in Italy
Gabriele Prati,Iana Tzankova,Irene Barbieri,Antonella Guarino,Christian Compare,Cinzia Albanesi,Elvira Cicognani +6 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the social representations of SARS-CoV-2 virus in Italy and used the technique of free word association involving 1572 adults living in Italy.
Journal ArticleDOI
Identifying Variables that Predict Depression Following the General Lockdown During the COVID-19 Pandemic
TL;DR: The results support the diathesis-stress model, which posits that a combination of preexisting vulnerabilities along with stressors such as negative life events are among the factors affecting the development of psychopathology.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China.
Cuiyan Wang,Riyu Pan,Xiaoyang Wan,Yilin Tan,Linkang Xu,Cyrus S.H. Ho,Roger C.M. Ho,Roger C.M. Ho +7 more
TL;DR: The findings identify factors associated with a lower level of psychological impact and better mental health status that can be used to formulate psychological interventions to improve the mental health of vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 epidemic.
Journal ArticleDOI
The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in China
TL;DR: The COVID-19 epidemic has spread very quickly and only took 30 days to expand from Hubei to the rest of Mainland China, with many people returning from a long holiday, China needs to prepare for the possible rebound of the epidemic.
Journal ArticleDOI
A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: Implications and policy recommendations
TL;DR: This study is the first nationwide large-scale survey of psychological distress in the general population of China during the COVID-19 epidemic, which triggered a wide variety of psychological problems, including panic disorder, anxiety and depression.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns
Kim Witte,Mike Allen +1 more
TL;DR: The meta-analysis suggests that strong fear appeals produce high levels of perceived severity and susceptibility, and are more persuasive than low or weak fear appeals, and the results indicate that fear appeals motivate adaptive danger control actions such as message acceptance and maladaptive fear control actionssuch as defensive avoidance or reactance.
Journal ArticleDOI
An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: the PHQ-4.
TL;DR: The PHQ-4 is a valid ultra-brief tool for detecting both anxiety and depressive disorders and has a substantial effect on functional status that was independent of depression.
Related Papers (5)
Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science.
Emily A. Holmes,Emily A. Holmes,Rory C. O'Connor,V. Hugh Perry,Irene Tracey,Simon Wessely,Louise Arseneault,Clive Ballard,Helen Christensen,Roxane Cohen Silver,Ian P. Everall,Tamsin Ford,Ann John,Thomas Kabir,Kate King,Ira Madan,Susan Michie,Andrew K. Przybylski,Roz Shafran,Angela Sweeney,Carol M. Worthman,Lucy Yardley,Katherine Cowan,Claire Cope,Matthew Hotopf,Edward T. Bullmore +25 more