scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Age Differences in COVID-19 Risk Perceptions and Mental Health: Evidence From a National U.S. Survey Conducted in March 2020.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
U.S. adults who were relatively older appeared to have a more optimistic outlook and better mental health during the early stages of the pandemic, and interventions may be needed to help people of all ages maintain realistic perceptions of the risks, while also managing depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 crisis.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Theories of aging posit that older adult age is associated with less negative emotions, but few studies have examined age differences at times of novel challenges. As COVID-19 spread in the United States, this study therefore aimed to examine age differences in risk perceptions, anxiety and depression. METHOD: In March 2020, a nationally representative address-based sample of 6666 US adults assessed their perceived risk of getting COVID-19, dying if getting it, getting quarantined, losing their job (if currently working), and running out of money. They completed a mental health assessment for anxiety and depression. Demographic variables and pre-crisis depression diagnosis had previously been reported. RESULTS: In regression analyses controlling for demographic variables and survey date, older adult age was associated with perceiving larger risks of dying if getting COVID-19, but with perceiving less risk of getting COVID-19, getting quarantined, or running out of money, as well as less depression and anxiety. Findings held after additionally controlling for pre-crisis reports of depression diagnosis. DISCUSSION: With the exception of perceived infection-fatality risk, US adults who were relatively older appeared to have a more optimistic outlook and better mental health during the early stages of the pandemic. Interventions may be needed to help people of all ages maintain realistic perceptions of the risks, while also managing depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 crisis. Implications for risk communication and mental health interventions are discussed.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Psychological distress, anxiety, family violence, suicidality, and wellbeing in New Zealand during the COVID-19 lockdown: A cross-sectional study.

TL;DR: New Zealand’s lockdown successfully eliminated COVID-19 from the community, but this achievement brought a significant psychological toll, and the findings emphasise the need to pay equal attention to their effects on psychological wellbeing.
Journal ArticleDOI

Factors associated with psychological distress during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the predominantly general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluated factors associated with psychological distress among the predominantly general population during the COVID-19 pandemic and found that higher infection risk, living in hard-hit areas, having pre-existing physical or mental conditions, and longer media exposure were associated with higher odds of anxiety and depression.
Journal ArticleDOI

The ups and downs of daily life during COVID-19: Age differences in affect, stress, and positive events.

TL;DR: In the early weeks of the pandemic, older adults showed better emotional well-being and less reactivity to stressors but did not differ from younger adults in their exposure to COVID-19 stressors, and younger adults benefited more from positive events.
Journal ArticleDOI

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Older Adults: Rapid Review.

TL;DR: In this paper, a rapid review of the published literature was conducted on October 6, 2020, through a search of 6 online databases to synthesize results from published original studies regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on older adults.
Journal ArticleDOI

Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms in Healthcare Workers Dealing with the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.

TL;DR: In this paper, a review aims to analyze the literature to discover which topics have been focused on and what the latest developments are in managing the occupational risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) in healthcare workers during the current COVID-19 pandemic.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A lifespan perspective on terrorism: age differences in trajectories of response to 9/11.

TL;DR: Older age was associated with lower overall levels of general distress, a steeper decline in posttraumatic stress over time, and less change in fear of future terrorist attacks over the 3 years.
Journal ArticleDOI

Age Differences in Proactive Coping With Minor Hassles in Daily Life.

TL;DR: Age-related changes in proactive coping and in the threshold of labeling an event as stressor are examined, consistent with the view that older adults engage in more proactive coping to deal with minor hassles in their daily lives to manage these problems before they become more stressful.
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk as feelings or risk and feelings? A cross‐lagged panel analysis

TL;DR: The authors explored longitudinal relations between perceived risk and related feelings by following a group of military sailors prospectively during an international operation and found that perceived risk had impact on worry but not on emotional distress.
Journal Article

An Introduction to the Understanding America Study Internet Panel

TL;DR: The Understanding America Study (UAS) as discussed by the authors is a nationally representative Internet panel of approximately 6,000 adult respondents that is administered by the University of Southern California, which includes over 50 survey modules on topics such as retirement planning, economic well-being, and psychological constructs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring Subjective Probabilities: The Effect of Response Mode on the Use of Focal Responses, Validity, and Respondents’ Evaluations

TL;DR: It is found that, compared to the open-ended response mode, the visual linear and magnifier scale each reduced the use of 50%, 0%, and 100% responses, especially among respondents with low numeracy.
Related Papers (5)