scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

An extension of the analytic hierarchy process for industrial R&D project selection and resource allocation

TLDR
In this article, an extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for priority setting and resource allocation in the industrial R&D environment is explored, and an AHP modeling framework is developed, and is linked to a spreadsheet model to assist in the ranking of a large number of project alternatives.
Abstract
The research and development project selection decision is concerned with the allocation of resources to a set of proposals for scientific and engineering activities. The project selection and resource allocation process can be viewed as a multiple-criteria decision-making problem, within the context of the long-range and strategic planning process of the firm. The purpose of this paper is explore the applicability of an extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for priority setting and resource allocation in the industrial R&D environment. In this paper, an AHP modeling framework for the R&D project selection decision is developed, and is linked to a spreadsheet model to assist in the ranking of a large number of project alternatives. Next, cost-benefit analysis and integer programming are used to assist in the resource allocation decision. The paper concludes with an evaluation of the suitability of this approach as an expert support system, and directions for future research and testing.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A filter system for technology evaluation and selection

TL;DR: The development and application of an integrated model for technology selection is presented that encourages interdepartmental collaboration in collecting input data and in examining its outputs, thus fostering team cohesiveness and decisiveness.
Journal ArticleDOI

The use of a multi‐attribute tool for evaluating accessibility in buildings: the AHP approach

TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed a quantitative building accessibility assessment model for the construction industry based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to determine the priority of the accessibility criteria and a case scenario is used to illustrate the method.
Journal ArticleDOI

CROSS: A Multicriteria Group-Decision-Making Model for Evaluating and Prioritizing Advanced-Technology Projects at NASA

TL;DR: CROSS (consensus-ranking organizational-support system) is a multicriteria group-decision-making model that is implemented successfully at KSC to capture the DMs' beliefs through sequential, rational, and analytical processes.
Journal ArticleDOI

A composite index for measuring performance in higher education institutions

TL;DR: In this paper, a structured framework for mapping out key performance indicators (PIs) and developing a composite index for measuring performance in higher education institutions (HEIs) has been proposed, based on the analytic hierarchy process.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures

TL;DR: A method of scaling ratios using the principal eigenvector of a positive pairwise comparison matrix is investigated, showing that λmax = n is a necessary and sufficient condition for consistency.
Journal ArticleDOI

Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process

TL;DR: The thrust of the paper is a discussion of a number of illustrative applications of the AHP covering the following areas: the portfolio decisions of a firm whose management is concerned with the determination of the desired target portfolio and allocation of resources among its components.
Journal ArticleDOI

Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process

TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore various methods for reducing the complexity of the preference eliciting process in a group decision-making session, where the group structures the problem in a hierarchical framework and pairwise comparisons are elicited from the group for each level of the hierarchy.
Journal ArticleDOI

An Experimental Comparison of Different Approaches to Determining Weights in Additive Utility Models

TL;DR: In this paper, Saaty et al. compared five conceptually different approaches in terms of their weights and predictive ability, and found that on average, the methods predicted about equally well, except for unit weighting which was clearly inferior.
Journal ArticleDOI

R & D project selection models: An assessment

TL;DR: The existing normative R&D benefit measurement and project selection literature is assessed and the limitations inherent in the proposed models are determined.
Related Papers (5)