scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

An extrapolative model of house price dynamics

TLDR
A model in which homebuyers make a modest approximation leads house prices to display three features present in the data but usually missing from perfectly rational models: momentum at one year horizons, mean reversion at ve-year horizons and excess longer-term volatility relative to fundamentals as mentioned in this paper.
About
This article is published in Journal of Financial Economics.The article was published on 2017-10-01 and is currently open access. It has received 149 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Mean reversion & Momentum (finance).

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Extrapolation and Bubbles

TL;DR: In this paper, an extrapolative model of bubbles is presented, which predicts that good news about fundamentals can trigger large price bubbles, that bubbles will be accompanied by high trading volume, and that volume increases with past asset returns.
Journal ArticleDOI

Home price expectations and behaviour: Evidence from a randomized information experiment

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate how consumers' home price expectations respond to past home price growth, and how they impact investment decisions after eliciting respondents' priors about past and future local home price changes, and then re-elicit expectations.
Journal ArticleDOI

A survey on evolutionary machine learning

TL;DR: This paper provides a review on evolutionary machine learning techniques for major machine learning tasks such as classification, regression and clustering, and emerging topics including combinatorial optimisation, computer vision, deep learning, transfer learning, and ensemble learning.
Journal ArticleDOI

Personal Experiences and Expectations about Aggregate Outcomes

TL;DR: This article found that individuals who personally experience unemployment become more pessimistic about future nationwide unemployment, and the extent of extrapolation is unrelated to how informative personal experiences are, is inconsistent with risk adjustment, and is more pronounced for less sophisticated individuals.
Journal ArticleDOI

House Price Momentum and Strategic Complementarity

TL;DR: In this article, the authors introduce an amplification mechanism to reconcile the discrepancy between house price acceleration and the positive autocorrelation in price changes, which is not explained by existing theories.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Time Series Analysis.

Journal ArticleDOI

Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency

TL;DR: In this article, the authors show that strategies that buy stocks that have performed well in the past and sell stocks that had performed poorly in past years generate significant positive returns over 3- to 12-month holding periods.
Journal ArticleDOI

Time series analysis

James D. Hamilton
- 01 Feb 1997 - 
TL;DR: A ordered sequence of events or observations having a time component is called as a time series, and some good examples are daily opening and closing stock prices, daily humidity, temperature, pressure, annual gross domestic product of a country and so on.
Journal ArticleDOI

Noise Trader Risk in Financial Markets

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a simple overlapping generations model of an asset market in which irrational noise traders with erroneous stochastic beliefs both affect prices and earn higher expected returns.
Journal ArticleDOI

Investor Psychology and Security Market Under- and Overreactions

TL;DR: The authors proposed a theory of securities market under- and overreactions based on two well-known psychological biases: investor overconfidence about the precision of private information; and biased self-attribution, which causes asymmetric shifts in investors' confidence as a function of their investment outcomes.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (13)
Q1. What are the contributions in this paper?

Consistent with survey evidence, this approximation leads buyers to expect increases in the market value of their homes after recent house price increases, to fail to anticipate the price busts that follow booms, and to be overconfident in their assessments of the housing market. In this paper, the authors present a simple model of housing price formation that can fit these facts in which buyers use an approximation rather than fully fathoming the beliefs of past buyers. This bizarre formula works as long 

Several promising avenues for future research arise from this paper ’ s results. A second direction for future research is to explore the implications of naive filtering for con8The rational buyer begins with a prior on x0 which the authors seed randomly, as explained above. This overconsumption may be important for understanding the extent of leverage homeowners took on during the boom. Supply responses have the potential to temper price increases caused by naive homebuyers. 

For instance, if the annual persistence of growth shocks is 0.3 (the value of income growth persistence at the metro-area level), then λ = 1.2; a value of r = 0.04 then leads to r/(r + λ) = 0.03. 

When N →∞ and growth rates do not persist (λ→∞), the rational buyer’s posterior on the level of demand is a telescoping sum of past prices:E(Dt−δ|Ωpt ∪ Ωst ∪ Ωxt ) = ( − α1− α)n−1 rpt−nδ − α0Dt01− α0 + n−1∑ m=1 ( − α 1− α )m−1 rpt−mδ 1− α ,whereα = µr + µ σ2a σ2a + δσ 2 

Lemma 3. The weight Ag on the growth rate expectation in the pricing formula in Lemma 1 is given by Ag = [r(r + λ + φµ)] −1, where φ denotes the perceived probability that future buyers aresimple and do not use prices to draw inference, and 1 − φ is the probability that future buyers are sophisticated enough for the law of iterated expectations to hold. 

To compute the expected change, the authors use Proposition 4 to extend the expected one-year change conditional on a lagged one-year change (which is 0.20) to further years. 

In particular, she learns the average price pt′ every δ units of time before her purchase, that is, for t ′ = t− δ, t− 2δ, and so forth. 

A naive buyer’s posterior on the lagged level of demand is E(Dt−δ | Ω′i,t) = rpt−δ, and her estimate of the lagged growth rate equals E(gt−δ | Ω′i,t) = r(pt−δ − pt−2δ)λe−δλ/(1− e−δλ). 

The authors write this news as H0xt′ + vt′ , where H0 = ( 1 01 0 ) and vt′ is normal mean zero noise with covarianceR0 = ( σ2a/N 00 σ2s) . 

Then the correlation of price changes on once-lagged changes, given by Corr(∆pt,∆pt−δ), is positive if β1 > 0 and is strictly increasing in β1. 

The role that the bargaining process can play in shaping housing dynamics has been examined elsewhere (Anenberg and Bayer, 2013; Guren, 2014) and the authors are interested in particularly examining the role of non-standard beliefs. 

A significant portion of respondents, around 30%, explicitly mention house prices to justify their view (Piazzesi and Schneider, 2009). 

The weight Ag on growth expectations in the pricing formula in Lemma 1 is determined by equation (4), and in turn by the buyer’s expectation Ei,tpT of future prices.