scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessing the effectiveness of mental health courts: A quantitative review

TLDR
The findings suggest that MHCs are an effective intervention but this assertion is not definitive as many of the studies are not as strong as would be ideal thus limiting the conclusions.
About
This article is published in Journal of Criminal Justice.The article was published on 2011-01-01. It has received 166 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Mental health court & Mental health.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Recidivism following mental health court exit: Between and within-group comparisons.

TL;DR: Examination of Mental Health Courts for Recidivism 1 year postexit suggests that MHCs may be particularly effective for high-risk participants and that time spent in a MHC has positive effects on recidivism, regardless of graduation status.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rethinking responsibility in offenders with acquired paedophilia: Punishment or treatment?

TL;DR: Decisions to fully or partially excuse an individual who fulfil the diagnosis of acquired paedophilia should take all relevant information into account, both neurobiological and other environmental evidence, and should proceed on a careful case by case analysis before sentencing or offering treatment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Improving Access To Care And Reducing Involvement In The Criminal Justice System For People With Mental Illness.

TL;DR: Current knowledge about the involvement of people with mental illness in the criminal justice system is summarized and the recent opportunities presented by national and local policies that aim to lower the proportion of such people who are incarcerated are considered.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Impact of Community Treatment on Recidivism Among Mental Health Court Participants

TL;DR: For the MHC sample, but not the treatment-as-usual sample, increased treatment was associated with reduced recidivism, and findings indicated increases in receipt of community treatment among MHC participants.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mentally Ill Offenders Involved With the U.S. Criminal Justice System: A Synthesis

TL;DR: The primary goal is to provide a detailed picture of the status of mentally ill offenders—including prevalence, basic demographic information, bio-psycho-social status, mental health, and family histories—and also to identify the problems, conditions, and obstacles faced while under the jurisdiction of the criminal justice system.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal Article

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.

TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Coefficient of agreement for nominal Scales

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a procedure for having two or more judges independently categorize a sample of units and determine the degree, significance, and significance of the units. But they do not discuss the extent to which these judgments are reproducible, i.e., reliable.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

TL;DR: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is introduced, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Related Papers (5)