Journal ArticleDOI
Assessing the effectiveness of mental health courts: A quantitative review
TLDR
The findings suggest that MHCs are an effective intervention but this assertion is not definitive as many of the studies are not as strong as would be ideal thus limiting the conclusions.About:
This article is published in Journal of Criminal Justice.The article was published on 2011-01-01. It has received 166 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Mental health court & Mental health.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Justice résolutive de problèmes : efficacité des tribunaux en santé mentale aux États-Unis et présentation du dispositif lyonnais
TL;DR: The Contrainte Penale Justice Therapeutique (CPJT) as mentioned in this paper is a system for the treatment of delinquentes atteintes de troubles mentaux.
Who Succeeds in Mental Health Court? Identifying Predictors of Program Retention and Legal Recidivism
TL;DR: A series of justice-related policy shifts and growing societal demands placed on the criminal justice system to solve our nation's social problems have resulted in the increased and disproportionate incarceration of individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) as mentioned in this paper.
Servicios universitarios en la interfaz del derecho y la salud mental: el caso de la Universidad de Cuenca, Ecuador University services in the interface of the law and mental health: the case of the University of Cuenca, Ecuador Serviços universitários na interface do direito e a saúde mental: o caso da Universidade da Cuenca, Equador
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe el servicio del Instituto de Criminolo-gia, Criminalistica e Intervencion Psicosocial Familiar de la Universidad de Cuenca, Ecuador.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal Article
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Coefficient of agreement for nominal Scales
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a procedure for having two or more judges independently categorize a sample of units and determine the degree, significance, and significance of the units. But they do not discuss the extent to which these judgments are reproducible, i.e., reliable.
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
TL;DR: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is introduced, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Related Papers (5)
Effectiveness of a Mental Health Court in Reducing Criminal Recidivism and Violence
Dale E. McNiel,Renée L. Binder +1 more