scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessReportDOI

Assessing the Future of Distributed Wind: Opportunities for Behind-the-Meter Projects

Reads0
Chats0
About
The article was published on 2016-11-01 and is currently open access. It has received 30 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Offshore wind power & Wind power.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy
Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC
This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy
Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications.
Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308
Assessing the Future of
Distributed Wind: Opportunities
for Behind
-the-Meter Projects
Eric Lantz
, Benjamin Sigrin, Michael Gleason,
Robert Preus,
and Ian Baring-Gould
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Technical Report
NREL/TP-6A20-67337
November 2016

NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy
Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC
This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy
Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications.
Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
15013 Denver West Parkway
Golden, CO 80401
303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov
Assessing the Future of
Distributed Wind:
Opportunities for Behind-the-
Meter Projects
Eric Lantz, Benjamin Sigrin, Michael Gleason,
Robert Preus, and Ian Baring-Gould
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Prepared under Task No. WE15.2E30
Technical Report
NREL/TP-6A20-67337
November 2016

NOTICE
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither
the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or
implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any
information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned
rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark,
manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring
by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do
not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof.
This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy
Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications.
Available electronically at SciTech Connect http:/www.osti.gov/scitech
Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy
and its contractors, in paper, from:
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information
P.O. Box 62
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062
OSTI http://www.osti.gov
Phone: 865.576.8401
Fax: 865.576.5728
Email: reports@osti.gov
Available for sale to the public, in paper, from:
U.S. Department of Commerce
National Technical Information Service
5301 Shawnee Road
Alexandria, VA 22312
NTIS http://www.ntis.gov
Phone: 800.553.6847 or 703.605.6000
Fax: 703.605.6900
Email: orders@ntis.gov
Cover Photos by Dennis Schroeder: (left to right) NREL 26173, NREL 18302, NREL 19758, NREL 29642, NREL 19795.
NREL prints on paper that contains recycled content.

iii
This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory at www.nrel.gov/publications.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-
AC36-08GO28308 with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Funding for the
work was provided by the DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Wind
Energy Technologies Office. The authors thank Mike Bergey (Bergey Wind Power), Padma
Kasthurirangan (Niagara Wind and Solar), Tom Wind (Wind Utility Consulting), and Alice
Orrell (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory) for providing support and assistance as part of
the project’s Technical Review Group and for reviewing prior versions of this manuscript. We
thank Charles Newcomb (previously of Endurance Wind Power) for supporting this project as
part of the Technical Review Group. We also thank Trudy Forsyth (Wind Advisors Team), Bret
Barker (Barker Advisory, contractor to DOE), Rich Tusing (Allegheny Science and Technology,
contractor to DOE), Patrick Gilman (DOE), Mark Higgins (DOE), Mike Derby (DOE), and Jose
Zayas (DOE) for their strategic input and guidance in the development and execution of this
work. We thank our NREL colleagues Maureen Hand, Tony Jimenez, Maggie Mann, Dave
Mooney, Brian Smith, Gian Porro, and Robin Newmark for reviewing prior versions of this
manuscript. Finally, thanks to Sheri Anstedt (NREL) and Mary Lukkonen (contractor to NREL)
for editing support. Opinions represented in this article are the authors’ own and do not reflect
the view of the U.S. Department of Energy or the U.S. government. Of course, any remaining
errors or omissions are the sole responsibility of the authors.

iv
This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory at www.nrel.gov/publications.
List of Acronyms
AEO Annual Energy Outlook
C
p
coefficient of performance
DOE U.S. Department of Energy
dWind Distributed Wind Market Demand Model (NREL)
EIA Energy Information Administrations
GW gigawatt
ITC investment tax credit
kW kilowatt
LCOE levelized cost of energy
m meter
MACRS Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System
MW megawatt
NPV net present value
NREL National Renewable Energy Laboratory
NYSERDA New York State Energy Research and Development Authority
OEM original equipment manufacturer
O&M operation and maintenance
PNNL Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
PTC production tax credit
PV photovoltaic
WACC weighted average cost of capital

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Land use and turbine technology influences on wind potential in the United States

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the onshore wind resource potential for the conterminous United States and its sensitivity to siting constraints and turbine technology innovation and found that siting constraint may shift the total capacity available to commercial wind energy by 2.3-15.1 TW.
Journal ArticleDOI

Flow shop scheduling with grid-integrated onsite wind power using stochastic MILP.

TL;DR: A solution procedure is proposed that first generates a large number of wind power scenarios that characterise the variability in wind power over time, and a two-stage stochastic optimisation procedure computes a production schedule and energy supply decisions for a flow shop system.
Journal ArticleDOI

Observed site obstacle impacts on the energy performance of a large scale urban wind turbine using an electrical energy rose

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an analysis of the impact of various site obstacle features, from local buildings to regional topography, on the energy performance of an 850kW rated wind turbine operating in a peri-urban area.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables

TL;DR: A growth model for the timing of initial purchase of new products is developed and tested empirically against data for eleven consumer durables, and a long-range forecast is developed for the sales of color television sets.
Journal ArticleDOI

A comprehensive change detection method for updating the National Land Cover Database to circa 2011

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a new comprehensive change detection method (CCDM) designed as a key component for the development of NLCD 2011 and the research results from two exemplar studies, which integrates spectral-based change detection algorithms including a Multi-Index Integrated Change Analysis (MIICA) model and a novel change model called Zone, which extracts change information from two Landsat image pairs.
ReportDOI

U.S. Renewable Energy Technical Potentials: A GIS-Based Analysis

TL;DR: In this paper, the state-level results of a spatial analysis effort calculating energy technical potential, reported in square kilometers of available land, megawatts of capacity, and gigawatt-hours of generation, for six different renewable technologies.
ReportDOI

Land Use Requirements of Modern Wind Power Plants in the United States

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government and present a set of guidelines for the use of the information, apparatus, product, or process.
Journal ArticleDOI

Wind Vision: A New Era for Wind Power in the United States

TL;DR: Despite near-to medium-term cost barriers, a future U.S. electricity system in which wind plays a major role is technically feasible and could result in enduring benefits globally, nationally, and locally as discussed by the authors.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (9)
Q1. What are the contributions mentioned in the paper "Assessing the future of distributed wind: opportunities for behind-the-meter projects" ?

Orrell et al. this paper presented an exploratory analysis characterizing the future opportunity for behind-the-meter distributed wind, serving primarily rural or suburban homes, farms, and manufacturing facilities. 

Although the future LCOE trajectories for residential, commercial, and midsize turbines were more substantial than the LCOE trajectory for large turbines, the capital costs for large turbines were treated as the effective floor on future capital costs. 

As there are many locations in the United States that could be used either to serve local consumption or (larger) wholesale power needs, the addressable resource quantified here may be interpreted as a subset of more comprehensive estimates of land-based wind potential. 

Cumulative installed capacity was more than 74,000 megawatts (MW) at year-end 2015 and wind power supplied 4.7% of total 2015 U.S. electricity generation. 

Opportunities for behind-the-meter distributed wind are considered from three perspectives: addressable resource potential, economic potential, and market potential. 

Variables in their scenarios include capital and operation and maintenance costs, technology performance, the value of distributed generation, system financing and leasing costs, consumer adoption rates, and siting criteria. 

This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory at www.nrel.gov/publications.Wind power is one of the fastest growing sources of new electricity generation in the United States. 

Consistent with prior distributed generation analyses conducted at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory and as a first assessment of the opportunity for behind-the-meter distributed wind, this work does not consider potential competition from alternative distributed-generation sources such as rooftop solar photovoltaics, assumes federal and state tax incentives and renewable portfolio standards as legislated, and may not capture all costs of integration into the distribution network. 

The first of these perspectives is intended to frame the overall scale of the opportunity2; the second quantifies the potential capacity of systems that could generate a positive net present value (NPV) at a specific point in time; the third considers economics as well as consumer adoption behaviors to estimate potential deployment levels for the specific conditions assessed.