Barriers and Strategies in Guideline Implementation-A Scoping Review
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The scoping review revealed the following aspects as central elements of successful strategies for guideline implementation: dissemination, education and training, social interaction, decision support systems and standing orders.About:
This article is published in Healthcare.The article was published on 2016-06-29 and is currently open access. It has received 533 citations till now.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Prioritizing guideline recommendations for implementation: a systematic, consumer-inclusive process with a case study using the Australian Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management.
TL;DR: In this article, a four-step process to identify high-priority recommendations for implementation comprised of identifying key implementation criteria, which included reliability of the evidence underpinning the recommendation, capacity to measure change in practice, a recommendation-practice gap, clinical importance and feasibility of making the recommended changes; shortlisting recommendations; ranking shortlisted recommendations; and reaching consensus on top priorities.
Journal ArticleDOI
Physicians' and Pharmacists' Clinical Considerations for Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The IMPLICA2 Study.
Josep Franch-Nadal,Fermín García-Gollarte,Alfonso Pérez Del Molino,María Luisa Orera-Peña,Marta Rodríguez de Miguel,Malena Melogno-Klinkas,Hector David de Paz,Susana Aceituno,Patricia Rodríguez-Fortúnez +8 more
TL;DR: Low adherence to guideline recommendations may lead to suboptimal glycaemic control in elderly patients and the standardization of processes, extensive monitoring of patient treatment adherence and providing advice regarding specific personal lifestyle habits may improve the management of elderly T2DM patients.
Journal ArticleDOI
Organizational support in healthcare redesign education: A mixed-methods exploratory study of expert coach and executive sponsor experiences
TL;DR: A mixed-methods approach was used to explore the experiences of expert coaches and executive sponsors as key facilitators of workplace-based projects undertaken during an Australian postgraduate healthcare redesign course, revealing overall positive experiences for coaches and mixed experiences for sponsors.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Validity and Reliability of the Constructs of Pain Management-Measuring Tool for Incurable Patients
Masoumeh Shohani,Hamed Tavan +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, a pain management-measuring questionnaire for incurable patients was developed, consisting of 20 questions, and the face and content validity of the questionnaire and its constructs were measured using a panel of experts and factor analysis method, respectively, and its reliability was measured using internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha).
Journal ArticleDOI
The Need for Structured Strategies to Improve Stroke Care in a Rural Telestroke Network in Northern New South Wales, Australia: An Observational Study.
Yumi Tomari Kashida,Carlos Garcia-Esperon,Thomas Lillicrap,Ferdinand Miteff,Pablo Garcia-Bermejo,Shyam Gangadharan,Beng Lim Alvin Chew,William O’Brien,James Evans,Khaled Alanati,Andrew Bivard,Mark W Parsons,Jennifer J. Majersik,Neil J. Spratt,Christopher R Levi +14 more
TL;DR: In this article, a telestroke network in Northern New South Wales, Australia has been developed since 2017, and the authors aimed to describe changes in acute stroke workflow metrics over time to determine whether they improved with network experience.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.
Journal ArticleDOI
Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?: A Framework for Improvement
Michael D. Cabana,Cynthia S. Rand,Neil R. Powe,Albert W. Wu,Modena E. H. Wilson,Paul Andre C. Abboud,Haya R. Rubin +6 more
TL;DR: A differential diagnosis for why physicians do not follow practice guidelines is offered, as well as a rational approach toward improving guideline adherence and a framework for future research are offered.
Journal ArticleDOI
From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care
Richard Grol,Jeremy M. Grimshaw +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide an overview of present knowledge about initiatives to changing medical practice and suggest that to change behaviour is possible, but this change generally requires comprehensive approaches at different levels (doctor, team practice, hospital, wider environment), tailored to specific settings and target groups.
Journal Article
From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Commentary
TL;DR: An overview of present knowledge about initiatives to changing medical practice is provided, showing that none of the approaches for transferring evidence to practice is superior to all changes in all situations.
Related Papers (5)
From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care
Richard Grol,Jeremy M. Grimshaw +1 more