scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Barriers and Strategies in Guideline Implementation-A Scoping Review

TLDR
The scoping review revealed the following aspects as central elements of successful strategies for guideline implementation: dissemination, education and training, social interaction, decision support systems and standing orders.
About
This article is published in Healthcare.The article was published on 2016-06-29 and is currently open access. It has received 533 citations till now.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Physical Activity Interventions for Individuals With a Mild Traumatic Brain Injury:: A Scoping Review.

TL;DR: Identified PA intervention types offer various management options for healthcare providers and may improve a wide range of health-related outcomes supporting the inclusion of PA in the management of individuals of all ages with mTBI.
Journal ArticleDOI

Appropriate empirical antibiotic use in the emergency department: full compliance matters!

TL;DR: Insight was gained into factors that determine quality of antibiotic prescription in the ED and adherence to the full bundle of QIs was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality and future stewardship interventions in theED should focus on the entire process of antibiotic prescribing and not on a single metric.
Journal ArticleDOI

Barriers and facilitators to the management of mental health complications after mild traumatic brain injury

TL;DR: Family physicians could benefit from accessible and easily implemented resources to manage post-mTBI mental health conditions, having a better defined role in this process, and formalization of referrals to mental health specialists.
Journal ArticleDOI

2021 Guideline for Management of Patients With Lower-Extremity Wounds Due to Diabetes Mellitus and/or Neuropathic Disease

TL;DR: The Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society's (WOCN) "2021 Guideline for Management of Patients With Lower-Extremity Wounds Due to Diabetes Mellitus and/or Neuropathic Disease" as discussed by the authors provides an overview of the systematic process used to update and develop the guideline and recommendations from the guideline for screening and diagnosis, assessment, and management and education of patients with lower-extremity wounds due to diabetes mellitus or neuropathic disease.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.
Journal ArticleDOI

Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?: A Framework for Improvement

TL;DR: A differential diagnosis for why physicians do not follow practice guidelines is offered, as well as a rational approach toward improving guideline adherence and a framework for future research are offered.
Journal ArticleDOI

From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care

Richard Grol, +1 more
- 11 Oct 2003 - 
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide an overview of present knowledge about initiatives to changing medical practice and suggest that to change behaviour is possible, but this change generally requires comprehensive approaches at different levels (doctor, team practice, hospital, wider environment), tailored to specific settings and target groups.
Journal Article

From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Commentary

TL;DR: An overview of present knowledge about initiatives to changing medical practice is provided, showing that none of the approaches for transferring evidence to practice is superior to all changes in all situations.
Related Papers (5)