scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

Caveats for the Use of Citation Indicators in Research and Journal Evaluations

TLDR
The assumption that citation and publication practices are homogenous within specialties and fields of science is invalid and the delineation of fields and among specialties is fuzzy.
Abstract
Ageing of publications, percentage of self-citations, and impact vary from journal to journal within fields of science. The assumption that citation and publication practices are homogenous within specialties and fields of science is invalid. Furthermore, the delineation of fields and among specialties is fuzzy. Institutional units of analysis and persons may move between fields or span different specialties. The match between the citation index and institutional profiles varies among institutional units and nations. The respective matches may heavily affect the representation of the units. Non-ISI journals are increasingly cornered into "transdisciplinary" Mode-2 functions with the exception of specialist journals publishing in languages other than English. An "externally cited impact factor" can be calculated for these journals. The citation impact of non-ISI journals will be demonstrated using Science and Public Policy as the example.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields

TL;DR: This contribution presents a comprehensive review on the h-index and related indicators field, studying their main advantages, drawbacks and the main applications that can be found in the literature.

Mapping the backbone of science.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors presented a new map representing the structure of all of science, based on journal articles, including both the natural and social sciences, which provides a bird's eye view of today's scientific landscape.
Journal ArticleDOI

hg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices

TL;DR: This paper presents a new index, called hg-index, to characterize the scientific output of researchers which is based on both h-index and g-index to try to keep the advantages of both measures as well as to minimize their disadvantages.
Journal ArticleDOI

The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators

TL;DR: The nature and use of the journal impact factor and other common bibliometric measures for assessing research in the sciences and social sciences based on data compiled by Thomson Reuters are reviewed to help government policymakers, university administrators, and individual researchers become better acquainted with the potential benefits and limitations of bibliometrics in the evaluation of research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Detecting the historical roots of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy RPYS

TL;DR: Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS) as discussed by the authors is a method based on the analysis of the frequency with which references are cited in the publications of a specific research field in terms of the cited references.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using Triple Helix indicators

TL;DR: The Triple Helix model for measuring the emergence of a knowledge base of socio-economic systems is elaborates on, using multiple indicators: webometric, scientometric, and technometric to examine the current state of the innovation systems of South Korea and the Netherlands.
Journal ArticleDOI

Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science

TL;DR: In this article, the authors compare institutions and their aggregates in terms of their performance with reference to their previous stages, and reveal that the center of gravity of the world system of science may be changing accordingly.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dimensions of Citation Analysis

TL;DR: In this article, an analytical scheme that differentiates among the various types of cognitive and social functions of citations is used as the basis for an analysis of the results of a questionnaire designed to probe the citing behavior of a group of scientists who had cited one of four papers originating from a single biochemical laboratory.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dimensions of Citation Analysis

TL;DR: In this article, an analytical scheme is proposed in order to differentiate among the various types of cognitive and social functions of citations, and the subjective reasons why a paper is cited do not correspond directly to the textual uses of the citation in the citing text.
Related Papers (5)