scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

Caveats for the Use of Citation Indicators in Research and Journal Evaluations

TLDR
The assumption that citation and publication practices are homogenous within specialties and fields of science is invalid and the delineation of fields and among specialties is fuzzy.
Abstract
Ageing of publications, percentage of self-citations, and impact vary from journal to journal within fields of science. The assumption that citation and publication practices are homogenous within specialties and fields of science is invalid. Furthermore, the delineation of fields and among specialties is fuzzy. Institutional units of analysis and persons may move between fields or span different specialties. The match between the citation index and institutional profiles varies among institutional units and nations. The respective matches may heavily affect the representation of the units. Non-ISI journals are increasingly cornered into "transdisciplinary" Mode-2 functions with the exception of specialist journals publishing in languages other than English. An "externally cited impact factor" can be calculated for these journals. The citation impact of non-ISI journals will be demonstrated using Science and Public Policy as the example.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields

TL;DR: This contribution presents a comprehensive review on the h-index and related indicators field, studying their main advantages, drawbacks and the main applications that can be found in the literature.

Mapping the backbone of science.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors presented a new map representing the structure of all of science, based on journal articles, including both the natural and social sciences, which provides a bird's eye view of today's scientific landscape.
Journal ArticleDOI

hg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices

TL;DR: This paper presents a new index, called hg-index, to characterize the scientific output of researchers which is based on both h-index and g-index to try to keep the advantages of both measures as well as to minimize their disadvantages.
Journal ArticleDOI

The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators

TL;DR: The nature and use of the journal impact factor and other common bibliometric measures for assessing research in the sciences and social sciences based on data compiled by Thomson Reuters are reviewed to help government policymakers, university administrators, and individual researchers become better acquainted with the potential benefits and limitations of bibliometrics in the evaluation of research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Detecting the historical roots of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy RPYS

TL;DR: Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS) as discussed by the authors is a method based on the analysis of the frequency with which references are cited in the publications of a specific research field in terms of the cited references.
References
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

A stochastic model of technological evolution

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the mechanisms of the process of substitution and its mathematical description, including imitation aspects, diffusion processes, the rate of absorption of new technologies in different industries, and the economic dimension of the substitution process in terms of supply and demand.
Journal ArticleDOI

Building a list of journals with constructed impact factors

TL;DR: The online retrieval from the host DIMDI of the data needed for impact factor calculation is described in detail and the possible usefulness of constructed impact factors for citation and evaluation studies is discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

On generalising scientometric journal mapping beyond ISI's journal and citation databases

TL;DR: Results of this study indicate that a journal content-based map was not only far superior to the journal citation map, but also outperformed the map derived from the combination of both types of data.
Related Papers (5)