scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Citation to Legislative History: Empirical Evidence on Positive Political and Contextual Theories of Judicial Decision Making

TLDR
In this article, the authors present empirical evidence suggesting that political context and judicial panel dynamics influence an authoring judge's use of legislative history, and that the authoring judges will cite legislative history by legislators who share political party affiliation with the colleagues and superiors of the author.
Abstract
We present empirical evidence suggesting that political context—judicial hierarchy and judicial panel dynamics—influences an authoring judge’s use of legislative history. Specifically, we find that to the extent that political ideology matters, a district court judge’s choice of legislative history is influenced, albeit modestly, by (1) the political makeup of the overseeing circuit court and (2) the political characteristics of a judge’s panel colleagues, as well as by the circuit court as a whole. These factors matter more than the authoring judge’s own political‐ideological connection to the legislators. Put differently, an authoring judge will have a greater tendency to cite legislative history by legislators who share political party affiliation with the colleagues and superiors of the authoring judge than legislators sharing the same political party affiliation as the authoring judge himself. These findings are consistent generally with positive political and contextual theories of judicial...

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works Faculty Scholarship
2009
Citation to Legislative History: Empirical Evidence on Positive Citation to Legislative History: Empirical Evidence on Positive
Political and Contextual Theories of Judicial Decision Making Political and Contextual Theories of Judicial Decision Making
Michael B. Abramowicz
George Washington University Law School
, abramowicz@law.gwu.edu
Emerson H. Tiller
Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/faculty_publications
Part of the Law Commons
Recommended Citation Recommended Citation
Michael Abramowicz & Emerson H. Tiller, Citation to Legislative History: Empirical Evidence on Positive
Political and Contextual Theories of Judicial Decision Making, 38 J. LEGAL STUD. 419 (2009)
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has
been accepted for inclusion in GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works by an authorized administrator of
Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact spagel@law.gwu.edu.





Citations
More filters

Current index to legal periodicals

TL;DR: In this paper, Cardozo et al. proposed a model for conflict resolution in the context of bankruptcy resolution, which is based on the work of the Cardozo Institute of Conflict Resolution.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Positive Theory And Empirical Analysis Of Strategic Word Choice In District Court Opinions

TL;DR: For example, this article found that district court judges not ideologically aligned with the majority of the overseeing circuit judges use more hedging language in their legal reasoning in order to insulate these rulings from reversal.
Journal ArticleDOI

Does the Law Matter? Win Rates and Law Reforms

TL;DR: In this paper, the effect of law reforms on win rates and whether win rates can help predict future law reforms was evaluated through the prism of tax litigation and based on theories of analyzing judicial decision making.
Journal ArticleDOI

Judicial disharmony: A study of dissent

TL;DR: The authors empirically examined how judges differ in their view of the relevant law to a case and found that judges who disagree on the outcome of a case disagree as to which binding precedents apply.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Law's Delay: A Test of the Mechanisms of Judicial Peer Effects

TL;DR: In this paper, it was shown that preference-revealing interactions do not cause judicial peer effects and that the influence of law, specifically deference standards, influence the speed of decision-making.
References
More filters
Book

The choices justices make

TL;DR: The Choices Justices make: A strategic account of the Supreme Court's decision-making process is presented in this paper, where the authors show that justices realize that their ability to achieve their policy and other goals depends on the preferences of other actors, the choices they expect others to make, and the institutional context in which they act.
Book

The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model

TL;DR: A political history of the Supreme Court can be found in this paper, where the authors present a model of decision-making in the court and the decision-on-the-merits process.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ideological Voting on Federal Courts of Appeals: A Preliminary Investigation

TL;DR: For example, this paper found that a judge's votes, in ideologically contested areas, can be predicted by the party of the appointing president, and that the judge's ideological tendency, in such areas, will be amplified if the panel has two other judges appointed by an appointing president of the same political party.
Journal ArticleDOI

Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals

TL;DR: In traditional legal analysis, scholars take for granted the effect of Supreme Court doctrine lower courts are presumed to adhere to the self-enforcing principle of stare decisis and to apply the doctrines of higher courts to the particular facts of the underlying case as mentioned in this paper.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
Can a judge become a politician in India?

Put differently, an authoring judge will have a greater tendency to cite legislative history by legislators who share political party affiliation with the colleagues and superiors of the authoring judge than legislators sharing the same political party affiliation as the authoring judge himself.