Journal ArticleDOI
Consumer acceptance of gene-edited food products in China
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Wang et al. as discussed by the authors explored the role that food technology neophobia has on consumer acceptance and assessed how information on the differences between transgenic and gene editing technologies affects consumer preferences and found that consumers were considerably more accepting of products that have undergone genome editing rather than transgenic modification.About:
This article is published in Food Quality and Preference.The article was published on 2022-01-01. It has received 16 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Genetically modified food & Novel food.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Consumer Valuation of and Attitudes towards Novel Foods Produced with New Plant Engineering Techniques: A Review
TL;DR: In this article, the authors follow the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews to review the emerging international body of empirical evidence on consumers' attitudes and willingness to pay (WTP) for novel foods produced with New Plant Engineering Techniques (NPETs).
Journal ArticleDOI
Identity labels as an instrument to reduce meat demand and encourage consumption of plant based and cultured meat alternatives in China
TL;DR: Wang et al. as discussed by the authors used a food choice experiment to provide evidence from a survey of 3015 urban Chinese consumers on preferences for plant-based and cultured alternatives relative to a traditional pork product.
Journal ArticleDOI
The perspective of meat and meat-alternative consumption in China.
TL;DR: Wang et al. as discussed by the authors provided an overview of Chinese consumption based on literature review and found that Chinese consumers are aware of the environmental, health and animal welfare concerns, and can accept plant-based and lab cultured meats, but their adoption rate of these alternatives is low and their willingness to pay for them is also low from 5% below to 5% above conventional meat, compatible to the level in the US and EU countries.
Journal ArticleDOI
Towards social acceptability of genome-edited plants in industrialised countries? Emerging evidence from Europe, United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors explored recent developments relevant for social acceptability in selected non-adopters, Japan, New Zealand, the EU, Norway, and Switzerland in contrast to United States, Canada, and Australia.
Journal ArticleDOI
Public acceptance and stakeholder views of gene edited foods: a global overview.
TL;DR: The increasing popularity of gene editing in plants has prompted research on stakeholder views as mentioned in this paper , however, marketing challenges related to a lack of familiarity with the technology, labeling, and risk perception remain.
References
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
A New Approach to Consumer Theory
TL;DR: In this article, the authors extend activity analysis into consumption theory and assume that goods possess, or give rise to, multiple characteristics in fixed proportions and that it is these characteristics, not goods themselves, on which the consumer's preferences are exercised.
Journal ArticleDOI
Gene limiting cadmium accumulation in rice
TL;DR: Results indicated that OsHMA3 from the low Cd-accumulating cultivar limits translocation of Cd from the roots to the above-ground tissues by selectively sequestrating Cd into the root vacuoles.
Journal ArticleDOI
Effect of information about benefits of biotechnology on consumer acceptance of genetically modified food: evidence from experimental auctions in the United States, England, and France
Jayson L. Lusk,Lisa House,Carlotta Valli,Sara R. Jaeger,Melissa Moore,J.L. Morrow,W. Bruce Traill +6 more
TL;DR: In this article, the effect of information about potential benefits of biotechnology on consumer acceptance of genetically modified (GM) foods was investigated using an incentive compatible auction mechanism in three US states (California, Florida, and Texas) and in two European countries (England and France).
Journal ArticleDOI
Gene-edited pigs are protected from porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.
Kristin M. Whitworth,Raymond R. R. Rowland,Catherine Ewen,Benjamin R. Trible,Maureen A. Kerrigan,Ada G. Cino-Ozuna,Melissa Samuel,Jonathan Lightner,David G. McLaren,Alan J. Mileham,Kevin D. Wells,Randall S. Prather +11 more
TL;DR: Gene-edited pigs are protected from porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by being resistant to the PRRSV isolate NVSL 97-7895, a well-characterized, relatively virulent viral isolate that is commonly used in experimentalPRRSV infection trials.