scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Consumerism and professional work in the community pharmacy

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
It is shown how the professional role and status of the community pharmacist (chemist) in the context of consumerist health care is challenged by the consumer’s power in the commercial transaction and perceived expertise in the management of minor illness.
Abstract
In this paper we consider the professional role and status of the community pharmacist (chemist) in the context of consumerist health care. The sociological perspective of pharmacy as an incomplete or marginal profession has been challenged in more recent work, which describes how pharmacists act to ‘transform’natural objects (drugs) into more valued social objects (medicines). We consider this process as it applies to the everyday and ‘taken-for-granted’ act of buying medicines in the pharmacy. We draw on focus group and interview data from a study involving consumers and pharmacy staff in the North West of England. The consumers had purchased one of a group of ‘deregulated’ medicines, which were previously available only with a doctor’s prescription. One way in which pharmacists have sought to develop their professional role is by trying to formalise their involvement in the surveillance of medicine sales. We show how this professionalising strategy is challenged by the consumer’s power in the commercial transaction and perceived expertise in the management of minor illness. This challenge forms a boundary to the pharmacists’‘transformatory’ work, and forms part of an ongoing negotiation of the meaning and relevance of their expertise. We present the strategies adopted by consumers and pharmacy staff to (respectively) obtain the desired medicines and fulfil professional responsibilities against a background of differing and contested assessments of the risks associated with medicines use.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Belief, knowledge and expertise: the emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology.

TL;DR: The paper has three main aims: to trace the changing ways in which lay understandings of health and illness have been represented during the 1979-2002 period, to say something about the limits of lay knowledge and to call for a re-assessment of what lay people can offer to a democratised and customer-sensitive system of health care.
Posted Content

Shared Decision-making in the Medical Encounter: What Does It Mean? (Or, It Takes at Least Two to Tango)

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide greater conceptual clarity about shared treatment decision-making, identify some key characteristics of this model, and discuss measurement issues, as well as potential benefits of a shared decision making model for both physicians and patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

Critical perspectives on 'consumer involvement' in health research : Epistemological dissonance and the know-do gap

TL;DR: In this paper, a qualitative study of researchers' experiences and views of consumer involvement in health research was conducted in the UK, and the authors explored the "know-do gap" which relates to the tensions between researchers' perceptions of the potential benefits of, and their actual practices in relation to consumer involvement.
Journal ArticleDOI

Trust in the health system: An analysis and extension of the social theories of Giddens and Luhmann

TL;DR: The role that social factors (such as socio-economic status, class and age) play in an individual's willingness to trust is explored in this paper, where the authors demonstrate a need for further empirical research into the multidimensionality of trusting relationships, while suggesting new directions for research in public health.
Journal ArticleDOI

The corporatization of community pharmacy: implications for service provision, the public health function, and pharmacy's claims to professional status in the United Kingdom.

TL;DR: A mixed market in community pharmacy may be required to maintain a comprehensive range of pharmacy-based public health services and provide maximum benefit to all patients.
References
More filters
Book

Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research

TL;DR: The Discovery of Grounded Theory as mentioned in this paper is a book about the discovery of grounded theories from data, both substantive and formal, which is a major task confronting sociologists and is understandable to both experts and laymen.
Journal ArticleDOI

Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)

TL;DR: This paper attempts to provide greater conceptual clarity about shared treatment decision-making, identify some key characteristics of this model, and discuss measurement issues.
Journal ArticleDOI

Chronic illness as biographical disruption

TL;DR: The paper is based on semi-structured interviews with a series of rheumatoid arthritis patients and highlights the resources available to individuals, modes of explanation for pain and suffering, continuities and discontinuities between professional and lay thought, and sources of variation in experience.
Journal ArticleDOI

Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model.

TL;DR: This revised framework provides a dynamic view of treatment decision-making by recognizing that the approach adopted at the outset of a medical encounter may change as the interaction evolves and has practical applications for clinical practice, research and medical education.
Related Papers (5)