A theoretical explanation for the observed behavior of the Vicsek model, which proves to be a graphic example of a switched linear system which is stable, but for which there does not exist a common quadratic Lyapunov function.
Abstract:
In a recent Physical Review Letters article, Vicsek et al. propose a simple but compelling discrete-time model of n autonomous agents (i.e., points or particles) all moving in the plane with the same speed but with different headings. Each agent's heading is updated using a local rule based on the average of its own heading plus the headings of its "neighbors." In their paper, Vicsek et al. provide simulation results which demonstrate that the nearest neighbor rule they are studying can cause all agents to eventually move in the same direction despite the absence of centralized coordination and despite the fact that each agent's set of nearest neighbors change with time as the system evolves. This paper provides a theoretical explanation for this observed behavior. In addition, convergence results are derived for several other similarly inspired models. The Vicsek model proves to be a graphic example of a switched linear system which is stable, but for which there does not exist a common quadratic Lyapunov function.
TL;DR: A distinctive feature of this work is to address consensus problems for networks with directed information flow by establishing a direct connection between the algebraic connectivity of the network and the performance of a linear consensus protocol.
TL;DR: A theoretical framework for analysis of consensus algorithms for multi-agent networked systems with an emphasis on the role of directed information flow, robustness to changes in network topology due to link/node failures, time-delays, and performance guarantees is provided.
TL;DR: It is shown that information consensus under dynamically changing interaction topologies can be achieved asymptotically if the union of the directed interaction graphs have a spanning tree frequently enough as the system evolves.
TL;DR: A theoretical framework for design and analysis of distributed flocking algorithms, and shows that migration of flocks can be performed using a peer-to-peer network of agents, i.e., "flocks need no leaders."
TL;DR: The authors' convergence rate results explicitly characterize the tradeoff between a desired accuracy of the generated approximate optimal solutions and the number of iterations needed to achieve the accuracy.
TL;DR: This paper addresses the control of a team of nonholonomic mobile robots navigating in a terrain with obstacles while maintaining a desired formation and changing formations when required, using graph theory.
TL;DR: A nonequilibrium continuum dynamical model for the collective motion of large groups of biological organisms and describes a large universality class of microscopic rules, including those recently simulated by Vicsek et al.
TL;DR: An attempt is made to describe the motion of grouping individuals kinematically as distinct from simple diffusion or random walk, to model the grouping on the basis of dynamics of animal motion, and to interpret the grouping from the standpoint of advection-diffusion processes.
TL;DR: This paper is essentially a survey of known results about the spectrum of the Laplacian matrix of graphs with special emphasis on the second smallest LaPLacian eigenvalue λ2 and its relation to numerous graph invariants, including connectivity, expanding properties, isoperimetric number, maximum cut, independence number, genus, diameter, mean distance, and bandwidth-type parameters of a graph.
Q1. What have the authors contributed in "Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules" ?
Each agent ’ s heading is updated using a local rule based on the average of its own heading plus the headings of its “ neighbors. ” In their paper, Vicsek et al. provide simulation results which demonstrate that the nearest neighbor rule they are studying can cause all agents to eventually move in the same direction despite the absence of centralized coordination and despite the fact that each agent ’ s set of nearest neighbors change with time as the system evolves. This paper provides a theoretical explanation for this observed behavior.
Q2. What is the meaning of the union of a collection of graphs?
By the union of a collection of simple graphs, , each with vertex set , is meant the simple graph with vertex set and edge set equaling the union of the edge sets of all of the graphs in the collection.
Q3. What is the meaning of the definition of a simple graph?
By the intersection of a collection of simple graphs, , each with vertex set , is meant the simple graph with vertex set and edge set equaling the intersection of the edge sets of all of the graphs in the collection.
Q4. What is the form of the update equations?
The explicit form of the update equations exemplified by (38), depends on the relationships between neighbors which exist at time .
Q5. What is the simplest way to show that a group of agents is linked to its leader?
Then(40)The theorem says that the members of the -agent group all eventually follow their leader provided there is a positive integerwhich is large enough so that the -agent group is linked to its leader across each contiguous, nonempty time-interval of length at most .
Q6. What is the definition of a tight condition for a set of matrices?
This condition is tight in the sense that one can find a finite set of matrices with joint spectral radius , whose infinite products converge to zero despite the fact that there does not exist common quadratic Lyapunov function for the set.