Design of an Implantable Slot Dipole Conformal Flexible Antenna for Biomedical Applications
read more
Citations
Implantable and ingestible medical devices with wireless telemetry functionalities: a review of current status and challenges.
A Compact Polyimide-Based UWB Antenna for Flexible Electronics
Design and in Vitro Test of a Differentially Fed Dual-Band Implantable Antenna Operating at MICS and ISM Bands
Flexible, Polarization-Diverse UWB Antennas for Implantable Neural Recording Systems
Flexible Antennas: A Review.
References
Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz)
The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz
The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues
The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey
Implanted antennas inside a human body: simulations, designs, and characterizations
Related Papers (5)
Implanted antennas inside a human body: simulations, designs, and characterizations
Frequently Asked Questions (17)
Q2. What are the future works mentioned in the paper "Design of an implantable slot dipole conformal flexible antenna for biomedical applications" ?
In the future, integration of the required transceiver and power supply is envisaged to realize an implantable system for biotelemetry applications, completely embedded in biocompatible silicone and fabricated with a flexible technology, as shown in [ 18 ], [ 19 ] by one of the coauthors of this paper.
Q3. What is the purpose of the antenna?
In real-life applications, the antenna is intended to be implanted into the human body, subcutaneously, particularly inside the muscle.
Q4. What is the effect of tolerances in the dielectric properties of the different tissues?
the effect of tolerances in the dielectric properties of the different tissues can be significant, potentially influencing communication performance of the implantable slot dipole antenna.
Q5. What is the effect of the muscle tissue on the reflection coefficient of the antenna?
Using ADS Momentum, a parametric study is performed that determines the influence of the muscle tissue’s permittivity and conductivity on the reflection coefficient of the antenna, in terms of resonance frequency and fractional bandwidth.
Q6. What is the main issue addressed in this paper?
The main issues addressed in this paper are:1) design of a slot dipole antenna suited for implantation into the human body; 2) evaluation of the characteristics of the antenna in terms of reflection coefficient in planar and bent state, E-field and gain; 3) study of the sensitivity of the liquid mimicking the human muscle tissue, varying its nominal dielectric values; 4) checking the SAR limitations, by means of SAR measurements.
Q7. What frequency is the operation frequency of the antenna?
In this paper, the operation frequency of the antenna is from 2.4 GHz to 2.485 GHz, high enough to neglect the effect of anisotropy.
Q8. What is the SAR distribution in planar and bent state?
Measurements and simulations of the reflection coefficient in planar and bent state in the 2.45 GHz ISM band demonstrate a very large bandwidth in both states, fully covering the ISM band.
Q9. What is the electrical properties of the muscle tissue liquid at 2.45 GHz?
The electrical properties of the muscle tissue liquid at 2.45 GHz were standardized in [21] to be r = 52.7, σ = 1.95 S/m, ρ = 1000 kg/m3.
Q10. What is the dielectric value of the liquid at 2.45 GHz?
Dielectric values of the liquid at 2.45 GHz measured by the manufacturer result to be: r = 50.8, σ = 2.01 S/m, ρ = 1.030 kg/m3 [14].
Q11. What is the frequency of the antenna in planar state?
(iii) Antenna measurements are performed to validate the simulations: the measured bandwidth in planar state is 350 MHz (2.20-2.55 GHz) and the fractional bandwidth at the target frequency (2.45 GHz) is approximately 14.2%.
Q12. What is the antenna's sensitivity to change?
A third simulation, where a fixed relative permittivity r = 50.8 and a fixed conductivity σ = 2.01 S/m were used within the complete band, also indicates that the antenna is rather insensitive to changes of the surrounding medium.
Q13. What is the sensitivity of the antenna?
The measured SAR values with an input power of 2 mW averaged in 1-g and 10-g tissue show that the antenna respects the ICNIRP and FCC guidelines for general public exposure.
Q14. What is the importance of a good antenna structure?
It is, important to first simulate and measure a good antenna structure, such as the one presented in this paper, usable as an innovative starting point for future miniaturized design.
Q15. What is the radiation efficiency value of the antenna?
The radiation efficiency value is very low because the antenna is not in free space, but embedded inside a human arm, simulated as a very lossy medium.
Q16. What is the SAR distribution on the x-y plane of the antenna?
Fig. 19 shows the SAR distribution on the x-y plane of the antenna at z=0 when the input power is 2 mW: the peak SAR value is 0.308 W/Kg.
Q17. how much gain is the antenna in the human arm?
+50%/3-50%/25.8 2.51 2.48 2.47 2.45 2.44-37.2 -56.9 -41.8 -34.7 -29.9 -20%/40.6 2.52 2.51 2.5 2.5 2.48-24.8 -24.4 -23.9 -23.3 -22.40%/50.8 2.52 2.51 2.51 2.5 2.49-20.84 -20.8 -20.6 -20.42 -20 +20%/61.0 2.52 2.51 2.51 2.5 2.5-18.85 -18.83 -18.75 -18.65 -18.4 +50%/76.2 2.51 2.51 2.51 2.5 2.5-17.18 -17.14 -17.1 -17 -16.9zAntenna coaxial cablemuscle tissue liquid180 mmairxyΘΦFigure 14: CST numerical calculation model: the box simulates a human arm.and gain.