scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Discussing resuscitation preferences with patients: challenges and rewards.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Physician barriers to conducting effective discussions are discussed, a variety of approaches to enhancing these conversations are offered, and important communication techniques are reviewed.
Abstract
Discussing preferences regarding resuscitation is a challenging and important task for any physician. Understanding patients' wishes at the end of life allows physicians to provide the type of care patients want, to avoid unwanted interventions, and to promote patient autonomy and dignity. Hospitalists face an even greater challenge because they are often meeting a patient for the first time in a crisis situation. Despite the frequency with which clinicians have these conversations, they typically fall short when discussing code status with patients. In this evidence-based review, we discuss physician barriers to conducting effective discussions, offer a variety of approaches to enhancing these conversations, and review important communication techniques.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal Article

Can we talk ? Inpatient discussions about advance directives in a community hospital : attending physicians'attitudes, their inpatients'wishes, and reported experience.

TL;DR: Most medical inpatients in a community hospital want to, are able to, and meet their own physicians' indications to discuss advance directive discussions, and most patients' preferences for life-sustaining treatments are met.
Journal ArticleDOI

Improving residents' code status discussion skills: a randomized trial.

TL;DR: A focused, multimodality curriculum can improve resident performance of simulated CSDs and lasted for at least 2 months after the intervention.
Journal ArticleDOI

Go Wish: a tool for end-of-life care conversations.

TL;DR: The development of the Go Wish cards is described and some of the diverse cases in which they have been useful are reported, including patients' needs and concerns, and a means for sharing those ideas.
Journal Article

Awareness of do-not-resuscitate orders: What do patients know and want?

TL;DR: Most respondents were well informed about the meaning of DNR, thought DNR discussions should take place when patients were still healthy, preferred to discuss DNR decisions with family physicians, and did not consider the topic stressful.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients: The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT)

TL;DR: A 2-year prospective observational study (phase I) with 4301 patients followed by a two-year controlled clinical trial (phase II) with 4804 patients and their physicians randomized by specialty group to the intervention group or control group (n=2652).
Journal ArticleDOI

Extent and determinants of error in doctors' prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study.

TL;DR: Doctors are inaccurate in their prognoses for terminally ill patients and the error is systematically optimistic, which may be adversely affecting the quality of care given to patients near the end of life.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale. An examination of its reliability and validity in a research setting.

TL;DR: The utility of the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale as a valuable research tool when employed by trained observers is suggested and the relationship of the KPS to longevity in a population of terminal cancer patients documents its predictive validity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

TL;DR: It was found that patients prefer that decisions be made principally by their physicians, not themselves, although they very much want to be informed, and there was no correlation between patients’ decision making and information-seeking preferences.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of patients with advanced cancer using the karnofsky performance status

TL;DR: It is suggested that the KPS has considerable validity as a global indicator of the functional status of patients with cancer and might be helpful for following other patients with chronic disease.
Related Papers (5)