scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation

David R. Legates, +1 more
- 01 Jan 1999 - 
- Vol. 35, Iss: 1, pp 233-241
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the goodness-of-fit or relative error measures (including the coefficient of efficiency and the index of agreement) that overcome many of the limitations of correlation-based measures are discussed.
Abstract
Correlation and correlation-based measures (e.g., the coefficient of determination) have been widely used to evaluate the “goodness-of-fit” of hydrologic and hydroclimatic models. These measures are oversensitive to extreme values (outliers) and are insensitive to additive and proportional differences between model predictions and observations. Because of these limitations, correlation-based measures can indicate that a model is a good predictor, even when it is not. In this paper, useful alternative goodness-of-fit or relative error measures (including the coefficient of efficiency and the index of agreement) that overcome many of the limitations of correlation-based measures are discussed. Modifications to these statistics to aid in interpretation are presented. It is concluded that correlation and correlation-based measures should not be used to assess the goodness-of-fit of a hydrologic or hydroclimatic model and that additional evaluation measures (such as summary statistics and absolute error measures) should supplement model evaluation tools.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Differential impacts of climate change on the hydrology of two alpine river basins

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used a distributed catchment model with a set of 23 regional climate scenarios for monthly mean tem-perature (T) and precipitation (P) for two Alpine river basins, the Thur basin and the Ticino basin (1515 km 2 ).
Journal ArticleDOI

River stage prediction based on a distributed support vector regression

TL;DR: The validation results reveal that the proposed D-SVR model can carry out the river flow prediction better in comparison with others, and dramatically reduce the training time compared with the conventional SVR model.
Journal ArticleDOI

Novel approach for streamflow forecasting using a hybrid ANFIS-FFA model

TL;DR: In this paper, a hybrid adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS) approach was proposed for monthly streamflow forecasting. But the results of the ANFIS-FFA model are compared with the classical ANFis model, which utilizes the fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering method in the Fuzzy inference system (FIS).
Journal ArticleDOI

Short-term water quality variable prediction using a hybrid CNN–LSTM deep learning model

TL;DR: In this paper, a coupled CNN-LSTM model was proposed to predict water quality variables, namely dissolved oxygen (DO; mg/L) and chlorophyll-a (Chl-a; µg/L), in the Small Prespa Lake in Greece.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆

TL;DR: In this article, the principles governing the application of the conceptual model technique to river flow forecasting are discussed and the necessity for a systematic approach to the development and testing of the model is explained and some preliminary ideas suggested.
Journal ArticleDOI

On the validation of models

TL;DR: In this paper, it is suggested that the correlation coefficieness between observed and simulated variates is not as good as observed variates, and that correlation can be improved.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Leisurely Look at the Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and Cross-Validation

TL;DR: This paper reviewed the nonparametric estimation of statistical error, mainly the bias and standard error of an estimator, or the error rate of a prediction rule, at a relaxed mathematical level, omitting most proofs, regularity conditions and technical details.
Related Papers (5)