scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of a Mental Health Treatment Court with Assertive Community Treatment.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
While there were offenders for whom neither treatment was effective, a majority in both groups decreased jail days and improved psychosocial functioning, with MHTC participants demonstrating greater gains in most areas.
Abstract
Without active engagement, many adults with serious mental illnesses remain untreated in the community and commit criminal offenses, resulting in their placement in the jails rather than mental health facilities. A mental health treatment court (MHTC) with an assertive community treatment (ACT) model of case management was developed through the cooperative efforts of the criminal justice and mental health systems. Participants were 235 adults with a serious mental illness who were booked into the county jail, and who volunteered for the study. An experimental design was used, with participants randomly assigned to MHTC or treatment as usual (TAU), consisting of adversarial criminal processing and less intensive mental health treatment. Results were reported for 6 and 12 month follow-up periods. Clients in both conditions improved in life satisfaction, distress, and independent living, while participants in the MHTC also showed reductions in substance abuse and new criminal activity. Outcomes are interpreted within the context of changes brought about in the community subsequent to implementation of the MHTC.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Effect of Homelessness, Housing Type, Functioning, and Community Reintegration Supports on Mental Health Court Completion and Recidivism

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated whether community stability indicators predict program completion and delay re-arrest for homeless versus non-homeless mental health court participants in the Bronx Mental Health Court.
Journal ArticleDOI

More of the same? Treatment in mental health courts.

TL;DR: The research found that mental health court participation increased the frequency of outpatient treatment, but that social services and treatment specialized to address criminal risk factors were uncommon both at the baseline and at the 6-month follow-up.
Journal ArticleDOI

Criminal Justice and Behavioral Health Care Costs of Mental Health Court Participants: A Six-Year Study

TL;DR: Participation in an MHC may not result in total cost savings in the three years after enrollment, and MHCs need to more effectively define the target group for intervention.
Journal ArticleDOI

Interventions for female drug-using offenders

TL;DR: Three of the nine trials show a positive trend towards the use of any psychosocial treatment in comparison to treatment as usual showing an overall significant reduction in subsequent reincarceration, but not arrest rates or drug use.
Journal ArticleDOI

Procedural justice in mental health court: an investigation of the relation of perception of procedural justice to non-adherence and termination

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate participant perception of procedural justice in interactions with mental health court staff and the association between perceptions and recidivism (i.e., time in jail, new arrests, and probation violations), treatment adherence, and termination of mental health programs.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The fifth edition of the addiction severity index

TL;DR: The clinical and research uses of the ASI over the past 12 years are discussed, emphasizing some special circumstances that affect its administration.
Journal ArticleDOI

Alternative to Mental Hospital Treatment: I. Conceptual Model, Treatment Program, and Clinical Evaluation

TL;DR: Use of the community program for 14 months greatly reduced the need to hospitalize patients and enhanced the community tenure and adjustment of the experimental patients, and the results suggest that community programming should be comprehensive and ongoing.
Journal ArticleDOI

New data from the Addiction Severity Index. Reliability and validity in three centers.

TL;DR: The overall conclusion is that the ASI is a reliable and valid instrument that has a wide range of clinical and research applications, and that it may offer advantages in the examination of important issues such as the prediction of treatment outcome, the comparison of different forms of treatment, and the “matching” of patients to treatments.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Quality of Life Interview for the chronically mentally ill.

TL;DR: The development and psychometric evaluation of a structured, 45-minute Quality of Life Interview for the chronically mentally ill is described, which has satisfactory reliability and validity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Global Assessment of Functioning: A Modified Scale

TL;DR: The modified Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale has more detailed criteria and a more structured scoring system than the original GAF as mentioned in this paper, and the two scales were compared for reliability and validity.
Related Papers (5)