scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of a Mental Health Treatment Court with Assertive Community Treatment.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
While there were offenders for whom neither treatment was effective, a majority in both groups decreased jail days and improved psychosocial functioning, with MHTC participants demonstrating greater gains in most areas.
Abstract
Without active engagement, many adults with serious mental illnesses remain untreated in the community and commit criminal offenses, resulting in their placement in the jails rather than mental health facilities. A mental health treatment court (MHTC) with an assertive community treatment (ACT) model of case management was developed through the cooperative efforts of the criminal justice and mental health systems. Participants were 235 adults with a serious mental illness who were booked into the county jail, and who volunteered for the study. An experimental design was used, with participants randomly assigned to MHTC or treatment as usual (TAU), consisting of adversarial criminal processing and less intensive mental health treatment. Results were reported for 6 and 12 month follow-up periods. Clients in both conditions improved in life satisfaction, distress, and independent living, while participants in the MHTC also showed reductions in substance abuse and new criminal activity. Outcomes are interpreted within the context of changes brought about in the community subsequent to implementation of the MHTC.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Does the evidence support the case for mental health courts? A review of the literature.

TL;DR: It is recommended that future mental health court research examine the impact of available community services, as well as consider the effect of criminogenic risk factors, on therapeutic and recidivism outcomes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Voluntary, but knowing and intelligent: Comprehension in mental health courts.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors studied the comprehension of mental health court participants and found that the level of comprehension at entry may predict future success or failure in the court. But, the ability to make these decisions is important given that MHCs are informal and thus may lack built-in safeguards against constitutional violations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Integrated Treatment for Jail Recidivists with Co-occurring Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders

TL;DR: Differences between experimental and control groups in arrests, convictions and jail days were not statistically significant, and experimental participants had lower study period psychiatric inpatient and crisis utilization and greater outpatient utilization than did control group participants.
Journal ArticleDOI

Long-term recidivism of mental health court defendants

TL;DR: It is suggested that MHCs can reduce criminal recidivism among offenders with mental illness and that this effect is sustained for several years after defendants are no longer under the court's supervision.
Journal ArticleDOI

Psychosis and Violence : Stories, Fears, and Reality

TL;DR: An overview of the evidence on relations between psychosis and violence to others is provided and public fears about individuals with psychotic illnesses are largely unfounded.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The fifth edition of the addiction severity index

TL;DR: The clinical and research uses of the ASI over the past 12 years are discussed, emphasizing some special circumstances that affect its administration.
Journal ArticleDOI

Alternative to Mental Hospital Treatment: I. Conceptual Model, Treatment Program, and Clinical Evaluation

TL;DR: Use of the community program for 14 months greatly reduced the need to hospitalize patients and enhanced the community tenure and adjustment of the experimental patients, and the results suggest that community programming should be comprehensive and ongoing.
Journal ArticleDOI

New data from the Addiction Severity Index. Reliability and validity in three centers.

TL;DR: The overall conclusion is that the ASI is a reliable and valid instrument that has a wide range of clinical and research applications, and that it may offer advantages in the examination of important issues such as the prediction of treatment outcome, the comparison of different forms of treatment, and the “matching” of patients to treatments.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Quality of Life Interview for the chronically mentally ill.

TL;DR: The development and psychometric evaluation of a structured, 45-minute Quality of Life Interview for the chronically mentally ill is described, which has satisfactory reliability and validity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Global Assessment of Functioning: A Modified Scale

TL;DR: The modified Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale has more detailed criteria and a more structured scoring system than the original GAF as mentioned in this paper, and the two scales were compared for reliability and validity.
Related Papers (5)