scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of a Mental Health Treatment Court with Assertive Community Treatment.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
While there were offenders for whom neither treatment was effective, a majority in both groups decreased jail days and improved psychosocial functioning, with MHTC participants demonstrating greater gains in most areas.
Abstract
Without active engagement, many adults with serious mental illnesses remain untreated in the community and commit criminal offenses, resulting in their placement in the jails rather than mental health facilities. A mental health treatment court (MHTC) with an assertive community treatment (ACT) model of case management was developed through the cooperative efforts of the criminal justice and mental health systems. Participants were 235 adults with a serious mental illness who were booked into the county jail, and who volunteered for the study. An experimental design was used, with participants randomly assigned to MHTC or treatment as usual (TAU), consisting of adversarial criminal processing and less intensive mental health treatment. Results were reported for 6 and 12 month follow-up periods. Clients in both conditions improved in life satisfaction, distress, and independent living, while participants in the MHTC also showed reductions in substance abuse and new criminal activity. Outcomes are interpreted within the context of changes brought about in the community subsequent to implementation of the MHTC.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

How mental health courts function: Outcomes and observations.

TL;DR: Observations of the MHC sessions reveal a nonadversarial atmosphere in which participants interact directly with the judge and in which praise and encouragement are issued far more often than sanctions, which are associated with the observed outcomes and serve to contextualize them.
Journal ArticleDOI

Clinical Outcomes of Defendants in Mental Health Court

TL;DR: The fact that reductions in symptoms were not observed among defendants who received treatment in either court setting more likely reflects the chronic nature of their disorders and concerns about the adequacy of the public mental health system, rather than a failure of the mental health court.
Journal ArticleDOI

A systematic review of outcome measures used in forensic mental health research with consensus panel opinion.

TL;DR: The review provides clear support for the view that domains such as quality of life, social function and psychosocial adjustment have not been extensively employed in forensic mental health research, but are relevant and important issues.
Journal Article

The criminal justice outcomes of jail diversion programs for persons with mental illness: a review of the evidence.

TL;DR: Little evidence of the effectiveness of jail diversion in reducing recidivism among persons with serious mental illness is revealed, however, evidence was found that jail diversion initiatives can reduce the amount of jail time that persons with mental illness serve.
Journal Article

Adhering to the Risk and Need Principles: Does It Matter for Supervision-Based Programs?

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the effects of program characteristics on recidivism using a sample drawn from community non-residential programs to determine if the risk and need principles apply to traditional supervision-oriented programs such as intensive supervision probation, electronic monitoring, day reporting, and work release.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The fifth edition of the addiction severity index

TL;DR: The clinical and research uses of the ASI over the past 12 years are discussed, emphasizing some special circumstances that affect its administration.
Journal ArticleDOI

Alternative to Mental Hospital Treatment: I. Conceptual Model, Treatment Program, and Clinical Evaluation

TL;DR: Use of the community program for 14 months greatly reduced the need to hospitalize patients and enhanced the community tenure and adjustment of the experimental patients, and the results suggest that community programming should be comprehensive and ongoing.
Journal ArticleDOI

New data from the Addiction Severity Index. Reliability and validity in three centers.

TL;DR: The overall conclusion is that the ASI is a reliable and valid instrument that has a wide range of clinical and research applications, and that it may offer advantages in the examination of important issues such as the prediction of treatment outcome, the comparison of different forms of treatment, and the “matching” of patients to treatments.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Quality of Life Interview for the chronically mentally ill.

TL;DR: The development and psychometric evaluation of a structured, 45-minute Quality of Life Interview for the chronically mentally ill is described, which has satisfactory reliability and validity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Global Assessment of Functioning: A Modified Scale

TL;DR: The modified Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale has more detailed criteria and a more structured scoring system than the original GAF as mentioned in this paper, and the two scales were compared for reliability and validity.
Related Papers (5)