scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of a Mental Health Treatment Court with Assertive Community Treatment.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
While there were offenders for whom neither treatment was effective, a majority in both groups decreased jail days and improved psychosocial functioning, with MHTC participants demonstrating greater gains in most areas.
Abstract
Without active engagement, many adults with serious mental illnesses remain untreated in the community and commit criminal offenses, resulting in their placement in the jails rather than mental health facilities. A mental health treatment court (MHTC) with an assertive community treatment (ACT) model of case management was developed through the cooperative efforts of the criminal justice and mental health systems. Participants were 235 adults with a serious mental illness who were booked into the county jail, and who volunteered for the study. An experimental design was used, with participants randomly assigned to MHTC or treatment as usual (TAU), consisting of adversarial criminal processing and less intensive mental health treatment. Results were reported for 6 and 12 month follow-up periods. Clients in both conditions improved in life satisfaction, distress, and independent living, while participants in the MHTC also showed reductions in substance abuse and new criminal activity. Outcomes are interpreted within the context of changes brought about in the community subsequent to implementation of the MHTC.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

No Soldier Left Behind: The Veterans Court Solution.

TL;DR: The history of problem solving court implementation and the functioning of an established veterans court are traced and the experience, insights and suggestions of the members of the court are examined.
Book ChapterDOI

The Past, Present, and Future of Mental Health Courts

TL;DR: Mental health courts (MHCs) are one of several types of specialty courts designed to improve the practices and effectiveness of criminal justice as discussed by the authors. But they are not always suitable for individuals with mental illnesses.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mental Health Court Outcomes by Offense Type at Admission

TL;DR: It is suggested that defendants with a felony are less likely to complete MHC but those who do are at no greater risk of recidivism post-exit than those with a misdemeanor.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mental Health Court Participants' Perspectives of Success: What Key Outcomes Are We Missing?

TL;DR: In this article, the authors explored mental health court participants' perceptions of how the mental health courts impacted them and found that participants identified four salient successes that they perceived to result from mental healthcourt participation: improved psychiatric stability, sobriety, improved relationships, and increased engagement in life and mental health.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The fifth edition of the addiction severity index

TL;DR: The clinical and research uses of the ASI over the past 12 years are discussed, emphasizing some special circumstances that affect its administration.
Journal ArticleDOI

Alternative to Mental Hospital Treatment: I. Conceptual Model, Treatment Program, and Clinical Evaluation

TL;DR: Use of the community program for 14 months greatly reduced the need to hospitalize patients and enhanced the community tenure and adjustment of the experimental patients, and the results suggest that community programming should be comprehensive and ongoing.
Journal ArticleDOI

New data from the Addiction Severity Index. Reliability and validity in three centers.

TL;DR: The overall conclusion is that the ASI is a reliable and valid instrument that has a wide range of clinical and research applications, and that it may offer advantages in the examination of important issues such as the prediction of treatment outcome, the comparison of different forms of treatment, and the “matching” of patients to treatments.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Quality of Life Interview for the chronically mentally ill.

TL;DR: The development and psychometric evaluation of a structured, 45-minute Quality of Life Interview for the chronically mentally ill is described, which has satisfactory reliability and validity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Global Assessment of Functioning: A Modified Scale

TL;DR: The modified Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale has more detailed criteria and a more structured scoring system than the original GAF as mentioned in this paper, and the two scales were compared for reliability and validity.
Related Papers (5)