Fabrication of nanopillars by nanosphere lithography
read more
Citations
Colloidal self-assembly meets nanofabrication: from two-dimensional colloidal crystals to nanostructure arrays
Magnetic multilayers on nanospheres
Ordered Micro/Nanostructured Arrays Based on the Monolayer Colloidal Crystals†
Assembly of one dimensional inorganic nanostructures into functional 2D and 3D architectures. Synthesis, arrangement and functionality
From superamphiphobic to amphiphilic polymeric surfaces with ordered hierarchical roughness fabricated with colloidal lithography and plasma nanotexturing.
References
Nanosphere lithography: A materials general fabrication process for periodic particle array surfaces
Single Crystal Nanowire Vertical Surround-Gate Field-Effect Transistor
Microscopic uniformity in plasma etching
Superhydrophobicity and Superhydrophilicity of Regular Nanopatterns
Separation of long DNA molecules by quartz nanopillar chips under a direct current electric field.
Related Papers (5)
Nanosphere lithography: A materials general fabrication process for periodic particle array surfaces
Nanosphere Lithography: A Versatile Nanofabrication Tool for Studies of Size-Dependent Nanoparticle Optics
Frequently Asked Questions (17)
Q2. What have the authors stated for future works in "Fabrication of nanopillars by nanosphere lithography" ?
This provides a possible route to extend the limitation of the present procedure to generate nanopillar patterns with longer range order.
Q3. Why were the side walls etched only minimally?
The side walls were etched only minimally due to the parallel directionality of the reactive ions to the side walls and the protection of deposited fluorinated polymers.
Q4. What is the etch rate of silicon substrates?
Since lower chamber working pressure will increase the mean free path of the molecular species used and produced in the etch process, the etch experiments were carried out at 4.5 mTorr to facilitate the transport and to increase the directionality of these species.
Q5. What is the challenge to generate a large domain size of packed nanospheres?
The challenge to generate a large domain size of packed nanospheres depends on the control of the phase of colloidal packing in the solution media and the interaction between the spheres and the substrates.
Q6. What is the etch rate of silicon pillars?
In their case, since the separation between the bead masks is of the order of 10–150 nm, the transport ofetchants and as-etched gaseous products is the major etch rate limiting factor to etch these pillars.
Q7. How long did the etching process take to produce short silicon pillars?
For silicon etch periods shorter than 22 cycles, the fabrication scheme yields short silicon pillars with structures as predicted.
Q8. How many etch cycles did the pillars have?
The fabrication of silicon nanopillars from the bead masks of different sizes and separation led to pillars of diameters from 200 to 350 nm and height of about 400 nm–2 µm by applying the “Bosch” time-multiplexed silicon etch process.
Q9. What was the effect of the etching process on the pillars?
Though the size of the bead mask shrunk about 5–10% in diameter during the silicon etch, the diameters of the pillars still matched the size of the corresponding masks because the diameter was defined during the beginning of the etch process.
Q10. What is the common method used to generate nanoparticle arrays?
NSL applies planar ordered arrays of nanometer-sized latex or silica spheres as lithography masks to fabricate nanoparticle arrays.
Q11. What is the use of such structures?
Such structures can be used for investigating proof of principle device architecture such as the vertical surround-gate field-effect transistors [18].
Q12. What is the effect of the packing density on the etching process?
Since these “masks” are densely packed with separation at the nanoscale, their packing density drastically affects the flow of reactive ion etchants and effluent ion species during the etching process.
Q13. What is the effect of the etching process on the silicon pillars?
This further demonstrates that the chosen etch process for the fabrication of small-size features is crucial over the ordinary RIE process which had been used to fabricate only low aspect ratio wells and pillars [7, 8].
Q14. How many cycles of the Bosch process were used to etch silicon pillars?
Both 15 and 22 cycles of the silicon “Bosch” etch process were used to etch these samples to generate pillar structures of different aspect ratio (Figure 5).
Q15. How long did the etching process take?
Though the etching process caused a minor increase in surface roughening on the etched beads, the beads in general were etched evenly in the lateral dimension within the tested time periods of 0–150 s.
Q16. What is the RIE process used to tailor polystyrene masks?
The tailoring of the size of polystyrene bead masks by oxygen RIE shrunk the diameters of these beads from 500 to 250 nm linearly with etch time (figure 2, Row A & figure 3).
Q17. How many cycles of etching did the bead masks remain intact?
After 15 cycles of etching, the bead masks remained intact and the diameter of the as-etched pillars is similar to those of the bead masks.