scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Guidance for transport planning and policymaking in the face of an uncertain future

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the authors argue for a focus upon the Triple Access System of spatial proximity, physical mobility and digital connectivity as a framework for policy and investment decisions that can harness flexibility and resilience.
Abstract
Uncertainty of outcome is widely recognised as a concern facing decision-makers and their advisors. In a number of spheres of policy, it appears uncertainty has intensified in the face of globalisation, economic instability, climate change, technological innovation and changing consumer preferences. How can planners and policymakers plan for an uncertain future? There is growing interest in, and use of, techniques that can help decision-making processes where deep uncertainty is involved. This paper is based upon one of the most recent international examples of a foresight exercise employed to examine uncertainty – specifically that which concerns uncertainty over the nature and extent of future demand for car travel. The principal focus of the paper is on the insights and guidance this examination of uncertainty brings forth for transport planning and policymaking. To accommodate deep uncertainty requires a flexible and open approach in terms of how policy and investment possibilities are formulated and judged. The paper argues for a focus upon the Triple Access System of spatial proximity, physical mobility and digital connectivity as a framework for policy and investment decisions that can harness flexibility and resilience. Uncertainty becomes an opportunity for decision-makers with the realisation that they are shaping the future rather than (only) responding to a predicted future. The paper outlines two forms of policymaking pathway: regime-compliant (in which adherence to trends and the nature of the world we have known pushes policy) and regime-testing (in which the nature of the world as we have known it is brought into question and vision pulls policy decisions). Stronger orientation towards regime-testing to assist in managing an uncertain future is advocated.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The governance of smart mobility

TL;DR: In this paper, the notion of ensuring and enhancing public value as a key governance aim for the transition of the mobility system has been proposed, and modes and methods of governance that could be deployed to steer the transition are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Getting smart about urban mobility – Aligning the paradigms of smart and sustainable

TL;DR: In this paper, a lack of consensus in terms of smart cities and a paucity of literature seeking to make sense of smart urban mobility is identified, and the authors consider how smart relates to sustainable, raising concerns about potentially dichotomous constituencies of commentators and discourses.
Journal ArticleDOI

Lessons learned from applying adaptation pathways in flood risk management and challenges for the further development of this approach.

TL;DR: Analysis of the experience in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands in long-term planning in flood risk management shows that the adaptation pathways approach is effective in keeping decision processes going forward, to the final approval of a long- term plan, and helps increase awareness about uncertainties.
Journal ArticleDOI

The dynamics of urban metabolism in the face of digitalization and changing lifestyles: Understanding and influencing our cities

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine how the digital age is supporting and contributing to changing lifestyles and more particularly lifestyle expressions, and reveal the highly complex and evolving nature of digitalization and collaborative consumption.
Journal ArticleDOI

The four knowledges of transport planning: Enacting a more communicative, trans-disciplinary policy and decision-making

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that the variety of knowledge forms in everyday transport planning processes should be more transparently articulated, while such transparency bolsters the democratic legitimacy of the outputs of such processes.
References
More filters
Book

The Limits to Growth

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate five major trends of global concern: accelerating industrialization, rapid population growth, widespread malnutrition, depletion of nonrenewable resources, and a deteriorating environment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors address the question of how technological transitions (TT) come about and identify particular patterns and mechanisms in transition processes, defined as major, long-term technological changes in the way societal functions are fulfilled.
Journal ArticleDOI

Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions

TL;DR: A review of accessibility measures for assessing the usability of these measures in evaluations of land-use and transport strategies and developments is presented in this paper, using a broad range of relevant criteria, including theoretical basis, interpretability and communicability, and data requirements of the measures.
Journal ArticleDOI

Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide a conceptual basis for the systematic treatment of uncertainty in model-based decision support activities such as policy analysis, integrated assessment and risk assessment, and propose an uncertainty matrix as a heuristic tool to classify and report the various dimensions of uncertainty, thereby providing a conceptual framework for better communication among analysts as well as between them and policymakers and stakeholders.
Book

Frame Reflection: Toward The Resolution Of Intractable Policy Controversies

TL;DR: In Frame Reflection, two of his country's leading organizational theorists and policy analysts show how disputes that in abstract debate or negotiation seem insoluble can sometimes be resolved pragmatically by those who actually have to design and implement the specific programs.
Related Papers (5)