Journal ArticleDOI
How to write a systematic review: Tips and tricks for surgeons in training
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This article aims to provide an overview of the methodology as well as certain tips and tricks which will help the surgeon when taking on such a project.Abstract:
Systematic reviews provide high-quality critical appraisal and evidence-based summaries on a topic. They represent a key resource for time-pressured clinicians as they strive to deliver better pati...read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Humanistic Pesantren: Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Visualization Analysis on Character, Moral, and Ethical Values
TL;DR: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of the studies on character education in Indonesian Islamic boarding schools from Scopus datasets from 2011 to 2020 is presented in this article , where the urgent goals are to describe the important elements of the bibliography, i.e., publication trends, the collaboration of the authors (coauthorship), and the terms used in the title and abstract (co-occurrence).
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Systematic Review: Process of Forming Academic Service Partnerships to Reform Clinical Education
TL;DR: This study’s findings can provide practical guidelines to steer partnership programs within the academic and clinical bodies, with the aim of providing a collaborative partnership approach to clinical education.
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.
Journal ArticleDOI
Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.
TL;DR: The new complication classification appears reliable and may represent a compelling tool for quality assessment in surgery in all parts of the world.
The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses
TL;DR: The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) as discussed by the authors was developed to assess the quality of nonrandomised studies with its design, content and ease of use directed to the task of incorporating the quality assessments in the interpretation of meta-analytic results.
Related Papers (5)
A Neuropsychologist's Guide To Undertaking a Systematic Review for Publication: Making the most of PRISMA Guidelines
Nicola J. Gates,Evrim March +1 more