scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Identifying influential nodes in large-scale directed networks: the role of clustering

TLDR
Experimental results on two directed networks, a social network extracted from delicious.com and a large-scale short-message communication network, demonstrate that the ClusterRank outperforms some benchmark algorithms such as PageRank and LeaderRank.
Abstract
Identifying influential nodes in very large-scale directed networks is a big challenge relevant to disparate applications, such as accelerating information propagation, controlling rumors and diseases, designing search engines, and understanding hierarchical organization of social and biological networks. Known methods range from node centralities, such as degree, closeness and betweenness, to diffusion-based processes, like PageRank and LeaderRank. Some of these methods already take into account the influences of a node’s neighbors but do not directly make use of the interactions among it’s neighbors. Local clustering is known to have negative impacts on the information spreading. We further show empirically that it also plays a negative role in generating local connections. Inspired by these facts, we propose a local ranking algorithm named ClusterRank, which takes into account not only the number of neighbors and the neighbors’ influences, but also the clustering coefficient. Subject to the susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) spreading model with constant infectivity, experimental results on two directed networks, a social network extracted from delicious.com and a large-scale short-message communication network, demonstrate that the ClusterRank outperforms some benchmark algorithms such as PageRank and LeaderRank. Furthermore, ClusterRank can also be applied to undirected networks where the superiority of ClusterRank is significant compared with degree centrality and k-core decomposition. In addition, ClusterRank, only making use of local information, is much more efficient than global methods: It takes only 191 seconds for a network with about nodes, more than 15 times faster than PageRank.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Vital nodes identification in complex networks

TL;DR: In this paper, the state-of-the-art algorithms for vital node identification in real networks are reviewed and compared, and extensive empirical analyses are provided to compare well-known methods on disparate real networks.
Journal ArticleDOI

Vital nodes identification in complex networks

TL;DR: This review clarifies the concepts and metrics, classify the problems and methods, as well as review the important progresses and describe the state of the art, and provides extensive empirical analyses to compare well-known methods on disparate real networks and highlight the future directions.
Journal ArticleDOI

The H-index of a network node and its relation to degree and coreness

TL;DR: A family of H-indices are obtained that can be used to measure a node's importance and it is proved that the convergence to coreness can be guaranteed even under an asynchronous updating process, allowing a decentralized local method of calculating a nodes' coreness in large-scale evolving networks.
Journal ArticleDOI

Identifying influential spreaders by weighted LeaderRank

TL;DR: According to the simulations on the standard SIR model, the weighted LeaderRank performs better than LeaderRank in three aspects: the ability to find out more influential spreaders; the higher tolerance to noisy data; and the higher robustness to intentional attacks.
Journal ArticleDOI

Identifying a set of influential spreaders in complex networks

TL;DR: VoteRank is presented, a simply yet effectively iterative method named VoteRank to identify a set of decentralized spreaders with the best spreading ability, and experimental results show that under Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) and Susceptibles Infected (SI) models, VoteRank outperforms the traditional benchmark methods on both spreading rate and final affected scale.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Collective dynamics of small-world networks

TL;DR: Simple models of networks that can be tuned through this middle ground: regular networks ‘rewired’ to introduce increasing amounts of disorder are explored, finding that these systems can be highly clustered, like regular lattices, yet have small characteristic path lengths, like random graphs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification

TL;DR: In this article, three distinct intuitive notions of centrality are uncovered and existing measures are refined to embody these conceptions, and the implications of these measures for the experimental study of small groups are examined.
Journal ArticleDOI

The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine

TL;DR: This paper provides an in-depth description of Google, a prototype of a large-scale search engine which makes heavy use of the structure present in hypertext and looks at the problem of how to effectively deal with uncontrolled hypertext collections where anyone can publish anything they want.
Journal Article

The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine.

Sergey Brin, +1 more
- 01 Jan 1998 - 
TL;DR: Google as discussed by the authors is a prototype of a large-scale search engine which makes heavy use of the structure present in hypertext and is designed to crawl and index the Web efficiently and produce much more satisfying search results than existing systems.
Journal ArticleDOI

Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment

TL;DR: This work proposes and test an algorithmic formulation of the notion of authority, based on the relationship between a set of relevant authoritative pages and the set of “hub pages” that join them together in the link structure, and has connections to the eigenvectors of certain matrices associated with the link graph.
Related Papers (5)