scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Increasing use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for the treatment of localized prostate carcinoma

TLDR
The authors examined the time trends and patterns of use for androgen deprivation in the form of gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists or orchiectomy, in population‐based tumor registries.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate carcinoma is controversial in earlier stages of disease. The authors examined the time trends and patterns of use for androgen deprivation in the form of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists or orchiectomy, in population-based tumor registries. METHODS Data were obtained from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database. A total of 100,274 men with prostate carcinoma diagnosed from 1991 through 1999 were selected. The main outcome was the proportion of men who received ≥ 1 dose of a GnRH agonist in the first 6 months of diagnosis. This was plotted by year and stratified for age, grade, stage as well as primary versus adjuvant usage. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine predictors of GnRH agonist use in the subset of patients with localized cancer. RESULTS There was a consistent increase in GnRH agonist use by year for all ages, stages, and grades. Even in men ≥ 80 years with localized stage and low to moderate grade tumors, primary GnRH agonist use increased over the study period, from 3.7% in 1991 to 30.9% in 1999 (P < 0.001). The multivariable analysis showed that significant variability in GnRH agonist use existed among SEER geographic regions. CONCLUSIONS The use of GnRH agonists for prostate carcinoma increased dramatically during the 1990s. This increase occurred across all stages and histologic grades of prostate carcinoma, and was greatest in patients ≥ 80 years. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease During Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

TL;DR: GnRH agonist treatment for men with locoregional prostate cancer may be associated with an increased risk of incident diabetes and cardiovascular disease and the benefits of GnRH agonists should be weighed against these potential risks.

Guidelines on Prostate Cancer

TL;DR: The introduction of an effective blood test, prostate specific antigen (PSA), has made it possible to diagnose more and more men in an earlier stage where they can be offered potentially curative treatments, and this is the subject of the EAU guidelines on prostate cancer.
Journal ArticleDOI

Combined Resistance and Aerobic Exercise Program Reverses Muscle Loss in Men Undergoing Androgen Suppression Therapy for Prostate Cancer Without Bone Metastases: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TL;DR: A relatively brief exposure to exercise significantly improved muscle mass, strength, physical function, and balance in hypogonadal men compared with normal care and could be recommended for patients undergoing AST as an effective countermeasure to these common treatment-related adverse effects.
Journal ArticleDOI

Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease During Androgen Deprivation Therapy: Observational Study of Veterans With Prostate Cancer

TL;DR: Androgen deprivation therapy with GnRH agonists was associated with an increased risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease and oral antiandrogen monotherapy was not associated with any outcome studied.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Physicians' reactions to uncertainty in patient care. A new measure and new insights.

TL;DR: By virtue of its clarity and good psychometric properties, this new measure promises insights into the role that uncertainty plays in physicians' resource utilization and practice patterns.
Journal ArticleDOI

The capsure database: a methodology for clinical practice and research in prostate cancer

TL;DR: Information available from CaPSURE will assist practicing urologists who must make clinical decisions on the basis of data such as the results of treatment in typical care settings, the effect of prostate cancer and its treatment methods on patient quality of life, and the effect on health care costs of the early detection of prostatecancer.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quality-of-life outcomes after primary androgen deprivation therapy: results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.

TL;DR: Most endocrine-related health outcomes are similar after surgical versus medical primary hormonal therapy, and these results provide representative information comparing surgical and medical AD therapy that may be used by physicians and patients to inform treatment decisions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Side effects of androgen deprivation therapy: monitoring and minimizing toxicity.

TL;DR: Physiologic effects, including gynecomastia, changes in body composition, and changes in lipids, are less commonly recognized as side effects of ADT and should be incorporated into routine practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

Combined orchiectomy and external radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for nonmetastatic prostate cancer with or without pelvic lymph node involvement: a prospective randomized study

TL;DR: The results strongly suggest that early androgen deprivation is better than deferred endocrine treatment for patients with prostate cancer and pelvic lymph node involvement and overall survival rates are significantly better after combined androgen ablation and radiotherapy than after radiotherapy alone.
Related Papers (5)