scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Janus Kinase Inhibitors and Coronavirus Disease (COVID)-19: Rationale, Clinical Evidence and Safety Issues.

TLDR
In this paper, a review of the development and use of JAK inhibitors in COVID-19, from artificial intelligence to current clinical evidence, including real world experience, and critically appraise emerging safety issues, namely infections, thrombosis, and liver injury.
Abstract
We are witnessing a paradigm shift in drug development and clinical practice to fight the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and a number of clinical trials have been or are being testing various pharmacological approaches to counteract viral load and its complications such as cytokine storm. However, data on the effectiveness of antiviral and immune therapies are still inconclusive and inconsistent. As compared to other candidate drugs to treat COVID-19, Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors, including baricitinib and ruxolitinib, possess key pharmacological features for a potentially successful repurposing: convenient oral administration, favorable pharmacokinetic profile, multifunctional pharmacodynamics by exerting dual anti-inflammatory and anti-viral effects. Baricitinib, originally approved for rheumatoid arthritis, received Emergency Use Authorization in November 2020 by the Food and Drug Administration in combination with remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients ≥ 2 years old who require supplemental oxygen, invasive mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. By July 2021, the European Medicines Agency is also expected to issue the opinion on whether or not to extend its use in hospitalised patients from 10 years of age who require supplemental oxygen. Ruxolitinib, approved for myelofibrosis, was prescribed in patients with COVID-19 within an open-label Emergency Expanded Access Plan. This review will address key milestones in the discovery and use of JAK inhibitors in COVID-19, from artificial intelligence to current clinical evidence, including real world experience, and critically appraise emerging safety issues, namely infections, thrombosis, and liver injury. An outlook to ongoing studies (clinicaltrials.gov) and unpublished pharmacovigilance data is also offered.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Molecular pathways involved in COVID-19 and potential pathway-based therapeutic targets.

TL;DR: In this article, a review of the possible mechanisms of the host response following SARS-CoV-2 infection and surveyed current research conducted by in-vitro, in vivo and human observations, as well as existing suggestions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Molecular pathways involved in COVID-19 and potential pathway-based therapeutic targets

TL;DR: In this paper , a review of the possible mechanisms of the host response following SARS-CoV-2 infection and surveyed current research conducted by in vitro, in vivo and human observations, as well as existing suggestions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Impact of COVID-19 on the liver and on the care of patients with chronic liver disease, hepatobiliary cancer, and liver transplantation: An updated EASL position paper

TL;DR: The European Association for the Study of the Liver as mentioned in this paper provides a summary of the latest data on the impact of COVID-19 on the liver and issues guidance on the care of patients with chronic liver disease, hepatobiliary cancer, and previous liver transplantation.
Journal ArticleDOI

JAK inhibitors and COVID-19

TL;DR: Whether a class effect of JAKi may be emerging in COVID-19 treatment, although at the moment the convincing data are for baricitinib only is discussed, because the precise timing of treatment will be very important in future trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

JAK-STAT Pathway: A Novel Target to Tackle Viral Infections

TL;DR: In this article, the authors review the diversity of strategies that viruses have evolved to interfere with JAK-STAT signaling, stressing the relevance of this pathway as a putative antiviral target.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Complex Management of Atrial Fibrillation and Cancer in the COVID-19 Era: Drug Interactions, Thromboembolic Risk, and Proarrhythmia

TL;DR: Clinical challenges in the management of oncological patients requiring anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation (AF) are summarized, also considering the current outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, since this infection can add challenges to themanagement of both conditions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Drug-drug interaction (DDI) assessments of ruxolitinib, a dual substrate of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9, using a verified physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to support regulatory submissions.

TL;DR: It is demonstrated that P BPK modeling can support characterizing DDI liabilities to inform the drug label and might help reduce the number of clinical DDI studies by simulations of untested scenarios, when a robust PBPK model is established.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mycobacterial Infections With Ruxolitinib: A Retrospective Pharmacovigilance Review.

TL;DR: Patients on ruxolitinib are at increased risk of developing MTB and AMI, and Clinicians should be aware of this risk and consider screening patients for latent MTB prior to initiating ruxolinib.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reporting of Thromboembolic Events with JAK Inhibitors: Analysis of the FAERS Database 2010–2019

TL;DR: In this paper, a potentially elevated risk for pulmonary thrombosis with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKinibs) was identified, as well as an increased risk for portal vein thromboembolic events in ruxolitinib patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

Favorable COVID-19 course despite significant comorbidities in a ruxolitinib-treated patient with primary myelofibrosis.

TL;DR: Clinical evidence that ruxolitinib treatment is feasible and can be beneficial in patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia, preventing cytokine storm and ARDS is provided.
Related Papers (5)