Lagrangian two-phase flow modeling of scour in front of vertical breakwater
read more
Citations
Particle methods in ocean and coastal engineering
Modelling solute transport in water disinfection systems: Effects of temperature gradient on the hydraulic and disinfection efficiency of serpentine chlorine contact tanks
Enhancing climate resilience of vertical seawall with retrofitting - A physical modelling study
Gaussian process emulation of spatio-temporal outputs of a 2D inland flood model.
Effectiveness of Eco-retrofits in Reducing Wave Overtopping on Seawalls
References
General circulation experiments with the primitive equations
Discrete numerical model for granular assemblies.
A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies
Smoothed particle hydrodynamics.
Simulating Free Surface Flows with SPH
Related Papers (5)
The Influence of Geometrical Shape Changes on Wave Overtopping: a Laboratory and SPH Numerical Study
Frequently Asked Questions (18)
Q2. What contributions have the authors mentioned in the paper "Lagrangian two-phase flow modeling of scour in front of vertical breakwater" ?
In this paper, a Lagrangian particle-based flow model was developed to simulate scouring in front of a vertical breakwater.
Q3. What is the dominant mode of transport for non-cohesive sediment grains?
for the large bed shear stress, sheet flow is the dominant mode of sediment transport for non-cohesive sediment grains [Fredsøe, 1993].
Q4. What is the energy of sediment in the suspended layer?
The energetic behavior of sediment in suspended layer occur due to the strong interaction between sediment particles and the top recirculating fluid cells.
Q5. What is the key underlying hydrodynamic mechanism of scouring?
The key underlying hydrodynamic mechanism of scouring is the steady streaming field, including bottom and top recirculating fluid cells at trunk section of vertical breakwater.
Q6. What is the effect of the sediment particles in the deposited layer?
The sediment particles in the deposited layer were mainly influenced by the vertical momentum transferring from the upper layers and moved with very low velocity.
Q7. How much time was required to reach the equilibrium state?
𝐿⁄ = 0.175 the scour depth (𝑍𝑠 𝐻⁄ ) reached the equilibrium condition at 𝐷 𝑇⁄ = 50, while for other test cases, more simulation time was required in order to reach the equilibrium state.
Q8. What is the effect of increasing the stream velocity near thebed?
it is apparently found that increasing the steady streaming velocity near thebed, accelerates the deposition rate and increases the depth of scour hole.
Q9. What is the height range of the sediment particles in the deposited layer?
The height range, between 7𝑑𝑝 to 11𝑑𝑝, relates to the hyper-concentrated layer; 11𝑑𝑝 to 13𝑑𝑝 is within the saltation layer, and values higher than 13𝑑𝑝 depicts the suspended particle layer.
Q10. What is the scour – deposition pattern?
The sediment transport process, scour – deposition pattern, and the momentum exchanges between fluid-sediment interphase aresystematically analyzed to understand the sediment transport dynamics and the impact of standing wave hydrodynamics on scouring patterns in front of vertical breakwaters.
Q11. How did the numerical scour pattern fit with the experimental results for the test No. 1?
It is evident that the numerical scour pattern fitted very well with the experimental result for the test Nos. 1-2, with ℎ/𝐿 = 0.150.
Q12. What is the scour depth in front of the breakwater trunk?
When the incident wave terrain reaches the vertical breakwater in shore-normal angle of approach, the scour in front of the trunk section of vertical wall-type breakwater is a two-dimensional process [Sumer & Fredsøe, 2002].
Q13. What is the maximum scour depth predicted by WCSPH-DEM model?
This study, for the first time, demonstrated an extra recirculating sediment transport mechanism in front of the vertical breakwater, similar to steady streaming recirculating cells in the fluid phase, which has a direct impact on the formation of scour hole and maximum scour depth at the breakwater trunk.
Q14. How much was the interphase momentum transferred from the fluid phase to the sediment phase?
The results indicated that the interphase momentum was transferred significantly from the fluid phase to the sediment phase at nearly 𝐷 = 𝑇 2⁄ .
Q15. What is the effect of the fluid flow on the sediment?
This layer of sediment was not influenced by fluid flow directly; however, the vertical momentum transfers from particle motions in the upper layers affected the movement of deposited layer.
Q16. What is the numerical results of the proposed model?
The numerical results confirm that the proposed model in this study is robust and effective tool to simulate the scouring process in front of the vertical coastal defenses.
Q17. What is the difference between the saltation layer and the hyper-concentrated layer?
Within the saltation layer, the saltating particles jump over the lower layer and the aggregation resulted from the moving sediment particles is low; however, particle’s kinetic energy is higher compared to the hyper-concentrated layer.
Q18. What is the effect of the steady stream velocity on the deposition rate?
The scenario modelling conducted in this study show that by increasing the steady streaming velocity, the deposition rate and the depth of scour hole were increased.