scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Life-cycle Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Capture for Enhanced Oil Recovery

TLDR
In this paper, a combined cycle power plant with a gross power output of 832 MW is combined with a CO 2 capture plant based on a post-combustion capture using amines as a solvent.
About
This article is published in Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering.The article was published on 2008-06-01 and is currently open access. It has received 90 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Enhanced oil recovery & Carbon capture and storage.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Carbon capture, storage and utilisation technologies: A critical analysis and comparison of their life cycle environmental impacts

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a comprehensive comparison of environmental impacts of carbon capture and storage (CCS) and carbon capture-and-utilization (CCU) technologies.

“Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies” from science magazine (2004)

TL;DR: A portfolio of technologies now exists to meet the world's energy needs over the next 50 years and limit atmospheric CO2 to a trajectory that avoids a doubling of the preindustrial concentration.
Journal ArticleDOI

Human and environmental impact assessment of postcombustion CO2 capture focusing on emissions from amine-based scrubbing solvents to air.

TL;DR: This work presents a first assessment of human health and environmental impacts of a postcombustion CO(2) capture facility, focusing on emissions from amine-based scrubbing solvents and their degradation products to air and develops characterization factors for human toxicity for monoethanolamine (MEA) as these were not yet available.
Journal ArticleDOI

Carbon capture and utilization technologies: a literature review and recent advances

TL;DR: A comprehensive list of Carbon Capture and Utilization technologies and applications is presented in this paper, ranging from lab-scale R&D activities reported in academic papers to commercially established companies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparative life cycle environmental assessment of CCS technologies

TL;DR: In this paper, a hybrid life cycle assessment is used to assess and compare the life cycle environmental impacts of electricity generation from coal and natural gas with various carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies consisting of post-combustion, pre-Combustion or oxyfuel capture; pipeline CO2 transport and geological storage.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies

TL;DR: A portfolio of technologies now exists to meet the world's energy needs over the next 50 years and limit atmospheric CO 2 to a trajectory that avoids a doubling of the preindustrial concentration as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

A technical, economic, and environmental assessment of amine-based CO2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control

TL;DR: Performance and cost models of an amine (MEA)-based CO2 absorption system for postcombustion flue gas applications have been developed and integrated with an existing power plant modeling framework that includes multipollutant control technologies for other regulated emissions.
Book

Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage

TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide information for policy makers, scientists and engineers in the field of climate change and reduction of CO2 emissions, as well as the costs, economic potential, and societal issues of the technology including public perception and regulatory aspects.
Journal ArticleDOI

Errors in Conventional and Input‐Output—based Life—Cycle Inventories

TL;DR: Using Monte‐Carlo simulations, it can be shown that uncertainties of input‐output– based life‐cycle assessments are often lower than truncation errors in even extensive, third‐order process analyses.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (14)
Q1. What are the contributions mentioned in the paper "Life-cycle assessment of carbon dioxide capture for enhanced oil recovery" ?

CO2 from this project will be utilized in part for enhanced oil recovery in the Halten oil field, in the Norwegian Sea. The authors study a potential design of such a system. The study focuses on the modifications and operations of the platform during EOR. 

Since fossilfuel use causes the largest anthropogenic material flows and energy is essential inthe production of every product, assessments of energy are the basis for any LCA. 

An electrification of the platform would cause substantial benefits in terms of reducing both greenhouse gas and acidifying emissions. 

4. Power supply: Due to the CO2 breakthrough and the increased power requirementof the CO2 injection, the produced gas can no longer be used to supply the power on the platform. 

The power plant and CO2 capture facility: A combined cycle power plant with agross power output of 832 MW is modeled to be running at full load. 

Khoo et al. (17) concluded that enhanced resource recovery methods, both with potential to sequester CO2, results in significant environmental benefits. 

The most important uncertainties in this work are connected to the performance characteristics and impacts associated with the carbon capture plants, the reservoir characteristics which influence the amount of recoverable oil and time at which the CO2 breaks through, and uncertainties about the design and operations of the CO2 injection and re-injection at the platform. 

5. Table 4 indicates that, on a life-cycle basis, the CCS reduces greenhouse gas emissions by 80%, but it substantially increases acidification potential due to the NH3 emitted from the capture plant. 

GeneralDeveloped from a number of roots in chemical engineering and energy analysis, Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a method to account for the environmental impacts associated with a product or service. 

The authors only model global warming and acidification impacts, because there is toolittle information available on emissions causing human or ecological toxicity. 

Viebahn et al. (31) showed that CCS technologies emit per kWh more than generally assumed in clean-coal concepts and much more if compared with renewable electricity. 

More surprisingly, the enhanced oil recovery using CO2 from the power plant would reduce the greenhouse gas emissions per unit of oil produced. 

Bellona (16) has been proposed a solution for resolving the financial risk issues, proposing government-backed firms that would capture the CO2, transport it to the platform, and sell it to the oil companies. 

The introduction of CO2 handling and its use for enhanced oil recovery require substantial changes to the operations on platform. 

Trending Questions (1)
What greenhouse gas does AC produce?

Our study shows a substantial reduction of the greenhouse gas emissions from power production by 80% to 75 g·(kW·h) −1 .