scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Meta-analysis for the transfer of economic benefits of ecosystem services provided by wetlands within two watersheds in Quebec, Canada

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors proposed an approach that integrates spatial variables that have not been previously used, including type of wetland (complex or isolated) and land use (% of agricultural, urban, forest and water land cover), at a much finer geographical scale of 50 km2.
Abstract
Climate change will cause major changes in ecosystems. Therefore, it is crucial that climate change policy consider the value of all services that are provided by watershed ecosystems. For this purpose, geospatial data and economic analysis are combined to determine a monetary value for wetland ecosystem goods and services (EGSs) in the watersheds of the Yamaska and Becancour Rivers (Quebec, Canada). From published studies of wetland economic evaluations, we selected 51 relevant studies from 21 countries and performed a benefit transfer using meta-analysis. Our research emphasises the importance of considering multiple wetland characteristics when conducting a benefit transfer because of their complementary effects. We propose an approach that integrates spatial variables that have not been previously used, including type of wetland (complex or isolated) and land use (% of agricultural, urban, forest and water land cover), at a much finer geographical scale of 50 km2. Simultaneous use of detailed spatial and economic characteristics in each wetland area allowed us to assign heterogeneous EGS values and map these values in sub-watersheds (50 km2) of the two rivers. Our results demonstrate that location and scale can affect wetland value. When wetland valuation was conducted based on mean values for geospatial characteristics, the EGS [2014 purchasing power parity (PPP) price] that is provided by wetlands was $5277 PPP/ha/year for the Yamaska River Watershed (YRW) and $3979 PPP/ha/year for the Becancour River Watershed (BRW). When wetland valuation was performed at a more detailed sub-watershed scale to reflect variability within a watershed, EGS (2014 PPP price) that is provided by wetlands was valued higher at $9080/ha/year for YRW and $4702/ha/year (2014 PPP price) for BRW.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services.

TL;DR: The potential of Nature based solutions (NBSs) as a cost-effective long term solution for hydrological risks and land degradation is shown and these services directly feed into the realization of the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations.

World development indicators 2006

TL;DR: The World Development Indicators 2006, World development indicators 2006, World Development indicators 2006, کتابخانه دیجیتال جندی شاپور اهواز
Journal ArticleDOI

Freedom space for rivers: An economically viable river management concept in a changing climate

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used a sensitivity analysis approach with numerical models predicting mobility of meanders (RVRMeander) and flood stage (HEC-RAS) for three rivers in southern Quebec (Canada) to determine whether they would still be valid under a future climate.
Journal ArticleDOI

Households' Willingness to Accept Improved Ecosystem Services and Influencing Factors: Application of Contingent Valuation Method in Bashang Plateau, Hebei Province, China.

TL;DR: The findings showed that a certain amount of compensation was likely to prompt households' participation in afforestation projects, and those who valued forests for protecting environments and improving ecosystem services opted for lower compensation amounts.
Journal ArticleDOI

Theory and practice of water ecosystem services valuation: Where are we going?

TL;DR: In this article, the authors defined five types of valuation and five major theoretical principles that can be broken down into 14 indicators that are used in their analysis of water ecosystem services studies and found that the current knowledge about ESw carries the false impression that the ecosystem services valuation is sufficiently consolidated to support decisions about payments for ESw.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity

Halbert White
- 01 May 1980 - 
TL;DR: In this article, a parameter covariance matrix estimator which is consistent even when the disturbances of a linear regression model are heteroskedastic is presented, which does not depend on a formal model of the structure of the heteroSkewedness.
Journal ArticleDOI

Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a reference-dependent theory of consumer choice, which explains such effects by a deformation of indifference curves about the reference point, in which losses and disadvantages have greater impact on preferences than gains and advantages.

The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors prove consistency and asymptotic normality of maximum likelihood estimators under weaker conditions than usual, such that the true distribution underlying the observations belongs to the parametric family defining the estimator, and the regularity conditions do not involve the second and higher derivatives of the likelihood function.
Journal ArticleDOI

Wetland resources : Status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability

TL;DR: In this paper, an international treaty (the 1971 Ramsar Convention) has helped 144 nations protect the most significant remaining wetlands in the world, and restoration techniques are improving, although the recovery of lost biodiversity is challenged by invasive species which thrive under disturbance and displace natives.
Journal ArticleDOI

What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values

TL;DR: This article used a meta-analysis to examine data from 29 experimental studies and found that on average, respondents overstate their preferences by a factor of about 3 in hypothetical settings, and that the degree of over-revelation is influenced by the distinction between willingness-to-pay and willingness to accept, publicversus private goods, and several elicitation methods.
Related Papers (5)