Modal Identification Study of Vincent Thomas Bridge Using Simulated Wind-Induced Ambient Vibration Data
read more
Citations
Smart structures: Part I—Active and semi-active control
Calculation of Posterior Probabilities for Bayesian Model Class Assessment and Averaging from Posterior Samples Based on Dynamic System Data
New methodology for modal parameters identification of smart civil structures using ambient vibrations and synchrosqueezed wavelet transform
Identifying damage locations under ambient vibrations utilizing vector autoregressive models and Mahalanobis distances
Numerical Evaluation of Vibration-Based Methods for Damage Assessment of Cable-Stayed Bridges
References
Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: A literature review
Spectral Characteristics of Surface-Layer Turbulence
An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction
Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics
Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes
Related Papers (5)
Dynamic Wavelet Neural Network for Nonlinear Identification of Highrise Buildings
Dynamic Fuzzy Wavelet Neural Network Model for Structural System Identification
Frequently Asked Questions (13)
Q2. What is the basic premise of vibration-based structural health monitoring?
The basic premise of vibration-based structural health monitoring is that changes in structural characteristics such as mass, stiffness, and energy dissipation mechanisms influence the vibration response characteristics of structures.
Q3. What are the main sources of wind-induced response of a suspension bridge?
Wind loads, including self-excited (caused by the interaction between wind and structural motion) and buffeting forces (caused by the fluctuating wind velocity field), are dependent on the geometric configuration of the bridge deck section, the reduced frequency of the bridge, and the incoming wind velocity fluctuations.
Q4. What are the effects of measurement noise on the identified natural frequencies?
bias and coefficient-of-variation due to measurement noise remain very small (negligible) for the identified natural frequencies.
Q5. What is the effect of the measurement noise on the natural frequencies and damping ratios?
Both bias and coefficient-ofvariation of the identified natural frequencies and damping ratios introduced by the measurement noise increase with increasing noise level as expected.
Q6. What is the MAC used to compare the identified and computed vibration mode shapes?
The modal assurance criterion (MAC) (Allmang and Brown, 1982) is used to compare the identified and computed (“exact”) vibration mode shapes.
Q7. What is the MAC value for the identified and computed modes?
The MAC value, bounded between 0 and 1, measures the degree of correlation between corresponding identified and computed mode shapes as2* identified computedidentified computed 22 identified computedΜΑC , )= f f(f f f f(28)-18-where * denotes the complex conjugate transpose.
Q8. What is the effect of measurement noise on the system identification results?
In-3-order to study the effects of measurement noise on the system identification results, zero-mean Gaussian white noise processes are added to the simulated output signals.
Q9. What is the rational function approximation method used to estimate the aerodynamic force coefficients?
the rational function approximation method known as Roger’s approximation is used toestimate the aerodynamic force coefficients defined in Equations (6), (7), and (8), also known as aerodynamic transfer functions, as continuous functions of the reduced frequency (Roger, 1977; Chen et al., 2000a; Lazzari et al., 2004).
Q10. What is the reason for the low MAC value for the second mode?
The high degree of non-classical damping identified for the second mode (see Figure 10) could be the reason behind the low MAC value obtained for this mode.
Q11. What is the significance of the simulated wind velocity fluctuations?
It is assumed that the buffeting force-12-components induced by the longitudinal, and vertical, wind velocity fluctuations are uncorrelated,since the statistical correlation between u and is neglected.
Q12. What is the rational function for the self-excited lift force component?
The above rational function representation of the aerodynamic transfer function for the self-excited lift force component induced by the vertical structural motion (see Equation 9) can be extended into the Laplace domain by introducing the Laplace parameter2 /v p= ,Lh iC.,Lh kds i Then,the self-excited lift force component induced by vertical structural motion can be derived by substitutingthe inverse Laplace transformation of ( )[ ( )]
Q13. What is the corresponding equation for the dynamic equations of motion of the bridge under aerodynamic?
The dynamic equations of motion of the bridge under aerodynamic wind loads are linearized (geometrically) about the displacement and stress fields corresponding to gravity loads.