scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Myocardial mechano-energetic efficiency in hypertensive adults.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In some hypertensive patients the left ventricle works inefficiently with a high energy wasting, at the same level of LV mass as hypertensivePatients with normal myocardial mechanical efficiency feature a high cardiovascular risk phenotype, with concentric LV geometry, systolic dysfunction, and indirect signs of more severe vascular impairment.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Myocardial mechanical efficiency can be measured as the ratio between systolic work and energy consumption. We evaluated the relation between myocardial mechanical efficiency and left ventricular (LV) mass in untreated hypertensive patients. METHODS Myocardial work was estimated in 256 normotensive (35 +/- 12 years) and 306 hypertensive patients (47 +/- 10 years) with normal ejection fraction, as stroke work in gram-meters (stroke work = BPs x SV x 0.0144, where BPs is systolic blood pressure, SV is echocardiographic stroke volume). Myocardial O2 consumption was estimated as the product of heart rate (HR) x BPs (eMVO2). Myocardial mechanical efficiency was estimated as the ratio of stroke work/eMVO2, which can be simplified and expressed as ml/s. RESULTS LV mass was greater in hypertensive than in normotensive patients (46 +/- 13 vs. 38 +/- 11 g/m2.7, P < 0.0001), but myocardial mechanical efficiency was identical (85 +/- 23 vs. 86 +/- 26 ml/s). Relations between myocardial mechanical efficiency and LV mass were close (both P < 0.0001), but more scattered among hypertensive patients because of 56 patients exhibiting low myocardial mechanical efficiency relative to the magnitude of LV mass. At comparable age and body size, these patients had higher HR, BPs, and pulse pressure than those with normal myocardial mechanical efficiency (all P < 0.001). After adjusting for age and sex, hypertensive patients with low myocardial mechanical efficiency showed greater relative wall thickness and lower ejection fraction and midwall shortening than those with normal myocardial mechanical efficiency (all P < 0.001). Low myocardial mechanical efficiency was also associated with inappropriately high LV mass (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION In some hypertensive patients the left ventricle works inefficiently with a high energy wasting, at the same level of LV mass as hypertensive patients with normal myocardial mechanical efficiency. Those patients feature a high cardiovascular risk phenotype, with concentric LV geometry, systolic dysfunction, and indirect signs of more severe vascular impairment.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Cardio-ankle vascular index and subclinical heart disease

TL;DR: A high CAVI is associated with inappropriately high left ventricular mass and low midwall systolic function, and as a marker of arterial diastolic-to-systolic stiffening, CAVI may have a relationship withleft ventricular structure and function that is independent of blood pressure levels.
Journal ArticleDOI

Depressed myocardial energetic efficiency is associated with increased cardiovascular risk in hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy.

TL;DR: A simple estimate of low myocardial mechano-energetic efficiency is associated with altered metabolic profile,LVH, concentric left ventricular geometry, and diastolic dysfunction and predicts cardiovascular end-points, independently of age, sex, LVH antihypertensive therapy, and cardiovascular risk factors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of diabetes and metabolic syndrome on myocardial mechano-energetic efficiency in hypertensive patients. The Campania Salute Network.

TL;DR: Both MetS and DM are associated with decreased MEEi in hypertensive patients, independently to each other, but the reduction is statistically less evident for MetS−/DM+.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms.

TL;DR: It is the opinion that current technology justifies the clinical use of the quantitative two-dimensional methods described in this article and the routine reporting of left ventricular ejection fraction, diastolic volume, mass, and wall motion score.
Journal ArticleDOI

Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements.

TL;DR: The survey shows significant interobserver and interlaboratory variation in measurement when examining the same echoes and indicates a need for ongoing education, quality control and standardization of measurement criteria.
Journal ArticleDOI

Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: Comparison to necropsy findings

TL;DR: To determine the accuracy of echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) dimension and mass measurements for detection and quantification of LV hypertrophy, results of blindly read antemortem e chocardiograms were compared with LV mass measurements made at necropsy in 55 patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate.

TL;DR: The MDRD Study equation has now been reexpressed for use with a standardized serum creatinine assay, allowing GFR estimates to be reported in clinical practice by using standardized serumcreatinine and overcoming this limitation to the current use of GFR estimating equations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: assessment of allometric relations and impact of overweight.

TL;DR: Normalizations of left ventricular mass for height or body surface area introduce artifactual relations of indexed ventricularmass to body size and errors in estimating the impact of overweight, which are avoided and variability among normal subjects is reduced.
Related Papers (5)