Periodic DFT+U investigation of the bulk and surface properties of marcasite (FeS2)
read more
Citations
I and i
First-principles calculations of electronic structure and spectra of strongly correlated systems: the LDA+U method
Marcasite iron sulfide as a high-capacity electrode material for sodium storage
First–Principles Investigation of the Structural, Elastic, Electronic, and Optical Properties of α– and β–SrZrS3: Implications for Photovoltaic Applications
Combined electrochemical and DFT investigations of iron selenide: a mechanically bendable solid-state symmetric supercapacitor
References
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set.
Projector augmented-wave method
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Related Papers (5)
Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set.
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Frequently Asked Questions (14)
Q2. How did the authors calculate the surface energy of the hydrated surfaces?
From a full geometry relaxation of the ionic positions of each surface in order to incorporate surface relaxation effects, the authors have computed the surface energy (γ), which is the energy required to cleave an infinite crystal in two—i.e., the amount of energy required to create a new surface.
Q3. What is the tunneling current between the surface and the tip in the STM experiments?
The tunneling current between thesurface and the tip in the STM experiments is proportional to the local density of states (LDOS) integrated between the Fermi energy and the sample bias.
Q4. What is the adsorption of water on the 110 surface?
The weak adsorption of water on the S−terminated {110} surface can be attributed to repulsive interactions between the O atom of thewater molecules and the terminating S ions.
Q5. What is the effect of the adsorption on the work function of the dehydrated surfaces?
the adsorption acts to smoothen the surface electric charge distribution (the Smoluchowski effect) which lowers the work function.
Q6. Why did the authors calculate the surface energy of the hydrated surfaces?
Because of the presence of water in the environment, the authors have also calculated the surface energiesof the surfaces with a monolayer of adsorbed water at both sides of the slabs, where the authors consideredthat a monolayer was obtained when all surface cation sites were terminated by a water molecule.
Q7. What is the significance of the band gap in pyrite?
Iron pyrite has received much attention as a promising photovoltaic materialbecause of its suitable band gap (Eg =0.95 eV), high abundance, nontoxicity, and strong light absorption (~105 cm−1 for hν > 4 1.4 eV).3−12Marcasite, the lesser known polymorph, is often considered to be an undesired contaminant phase for photovoltaic applications,13,14 because of its reported small band gap of 0.34 eV.15 Wadia andco-workers have speculated that the presence of trace amounts of marcasite in pyrite would significantly lower the band gap and therefore deteriorate the material’s photovoltaic performance.
Q8. What is the purpose of the simulated STM images?
the authors consider that the simulated STM images may become useful in clarifyingfuture experiments, for instance to distinguish between the {101} and {010} facets, which are themost likely facets to be observed under experimental conditions.
Q9. What is the effect of adsorption on the surfaces?
As is to be expected,hydration of the surfaces through adsorbed water molecules is found to have a stabilizing effecton all the surfaces studied, since the adsorption acts to coordinate the water molecules to the under-coordinated Fe ions, thus providing a closer to bulk coordination of the surface species.
Q10. Why are there no STM images available for comparison with the experimental results?
Due to the difficulty associated with obtaining single crystals with well-defined surfaces experimentally, their simulated STM images provide insight into the structures andcompositions of the marcasite surfaces, which may otherwise be hard to resolve experimentally,thus explaining why at present no experimental STM images are available for comparison withour results.
Q11. What is the adsorption energy of water on the 110 surface?
On the {101} surface (Figure 4), the water molecules are coordinated by their oxygen ions to the surface Fe(II) ions at an average Fe−O distance of 2.165 Å and 2.114 at the S− and Fe−terminatedsurfaces, respectively.
Q12. What is the adsorption energy of the water molecules on the 110 surface?
When adsorbed at the {110} surface (Figure 7), the water molecules released an adsorption energy of 0.37 eV at the S−terminated surface and 0.67 eV at the Fe−terminated surface.
Q13. What is the average adsorption energy of water on the 130 surface?
On the {130} surface, the adsorption energy of water onto the S− and Fe−terminations were calculated at −0.83 eV and −0.95 eV, respectively, and the average Fe−O bond distances arecalculated at 2.145 Å and 2.185 Å, respectively (Figure 6).
Q14. What is the work function of the pyrite 100 surface?
The calculated work functions (4.41−5.34eV) for the dehydrated surfaces compare well with the value of 5.0 eV obtained from ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) measurements for the pyrite {100} surface.