scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Photoinhibition of photosynthesis represents a mechanism for the long-term regulation of photosystem II.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The data give support for the view that photoinhibition of the reaction centres of PSII represents a stable, long-term, down-regulation of photochemistry, which occurs in plants under sustained high-light conditions, and replaces part of the regulation usually exerted by the transthylakoid ΔpH gradient.
Abstract
The obligate shade plant, Tradescantia albiflora Kunth grown at 50 μmol photons · m(-2) s(-1) and Pisum sativum L. acclimated to two photon fluence rates, 50 and 300 μmol · m(-2) · s(-1), were exposed to photoinhibitory light conditions of 1700 μmol · m(-2) · s(-1) for 4 h at 22° C. Photosynthesis was assayed by measurement of CO2-saturated O2 evolution, and photosystem II (PSII) was assayed using modulated chlorophyll fluorescence and flash-yield determinations of functional reaction centres. Tradescantia was most sensitive to photoinhibition, while pea grown at 300 μmol · m(-2) · s(-1) was most resistant, with pea grown at 50 μmol · m(-2) · s(-1) showing an intermediate sensitivity. A very good correlation was found between the decrease of functional PSII reaction centres and both the inhibition of photosynthesis and PSII photochemistry. Photoinhibition caused a decline in the maximum quantum yield for PSII electron transport as determined by the product of photochemical quenching (qp) and the yield of open PSII reaction centres as given by the steady-state fluorescence ratio, F'vF'm, according to Genty et al. (1989, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 990, 81-92). The decrease in the quantum yield for PSII electron transport was fully accounted for by a decrease in F'vF'm, since qp at a given photon fluence rate was similar for photoinhibited and noninhibited plants. Under lightsaturating conditions, the quantum yield of PSII electron transport was similar in photoinhibited and noninhibited plants. The data give support for the view that photoinhibition of the reaction centres of PSII represents a stable, long-term, down-regulation of photochemistry, which occurs in plants under sustained high-light conditions, and replaces part of the regulation usually exerted by the transthylakoid ΔpH gradient. Furthermore, by investigating the susceptibility of differently lightacclimated sun and shade species to photoinhibition in relation to qp, i.e. the fraction of open-to-closed PSII reaction centres, we also show that irrespective of light acclimation, plants become susceptible to photoinhibition when the majority of their PSII reaction centres are still open (i.e. primary quinone acceptor oxidized). Photoinhibition appears to be an unavoidable consequence of PSII function when light causes sustained closure of more than 40% of PSII reaction centres.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Photoinhibition of photosystem II : inactivation, protein damage and turnover

TL;DR: Various protective mechanisms and an efficient repair cycle of Photosystem II allow plants to survive light stress and probably allows for coordinated biodegradation and biosynthesis of the D1 protein.
Journal ArticleDOI

PHOTOPROTECTION REVISITED: Genetic and Molecular Approaches

TL;DR: Several photoprotective mechanisms operating within chloroplasts of plants and green algae are summarized, especially with respect to thermal dissipation of excess absorbed light energy, alternative electron transport pathways, chloroplast antioxidant systems, and repair of photosystem II.
Journal ArticleDOI

Regulation of light harvesting in green plants

TL;DR: It is shown how the dynamic properties of the proteins and pigments of the chlorophyll a/b light-harvesting complexes of photosystem II first enable the level of excitation energy to be sensed via the thylakoid proton gradient and subsequently allow excessEnergy to be dissipated as heat by formation of a nonphotochemical quencher.
Journal ArticleDOI

The role of the xanthophyll cycle and of lutein in photoprotection of photosystem II

TL;DR: In this paper, a review gives an overview on recent progress in the understanding of the photoprotective role of the xanthophylls zeaxanthin and lutein with emphasis on the NPQ processes associated with photosystem II of higher plants.
Journal Article

The role of the xanthophyll cycle and of lutein in photoprotection of photosystem II Bioenergetics

TL;DR: Current knowledge supports the view that the photoprotective role of Lut is predominantly restricted to its function in the deactivation of ³Chl*, while zeaxanthin is the major player in theDeactivation of excited singlet Chl and thus in NPQ (non-photochemical quenching).
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence

TL;DR: In this article, the quantum yield of non-cyclic electron transport was found to be directly proportional to the product of the photochemical fluorescence quenching (qQ) and the efficiency of excitation capture by open Photosystem II (PS II) reaction centres (Fv/Fm).
Journal ArticleDOI

Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy

TL;DR: In this paper, the extinction coefficients for chlorophylls a and b in diethylether (Smith, J.H. and Benitez, A.V., eds.), used in this paper as primary standards, were verified by magnesium determination using atomic absorbance spectrophotometry.
Book

Sand and Water Culture Methods Used in the Study of Plant Nutrition

Abstract: Since its appearanc e in 1952, Technical Communication no. 22 of the Commonwealt h Bureau of Horticulture and Plantation Crops has come to be recognized, at least in the English language, as the standar d reference for those interested in the developmen t of sand and water culture techniques used in plant nutrition research throughout the British Commonwealth , parts of Europe, and the United States. The Second Edition of this valuabl e work wil l strengthen even further the unique position it occupies. Most (395 of its 477 pages of text) of the book is devoted to a general review of the subject . A second part deal s in somewhat more detai l with the procedures used by the author at Long Ashton. The completenes s of treatment of the subject matter is best attested by the number of references . Their listing, with complet e titles and cross-indexing , requires 55 pages, which gives an estimated number of 1,800 references . The earliest reference date noted was 1699, the latest , 1964. They are primarily from Great Britain and the United States, but paper s from German, French, Russian, and Japanes e publications are also included. The section devoted to the historical developmen t of plant culture techniques is much longer than in the First Edition. The book represent s very much more than a historical account ing, however . It provides in great detail, and with numerous drawings where appropriate, information on every aspect of plant nutrition research . Likely problems that might be encountere d are presented , and the advantage s and disadvantage s of many of the procedures employed and material s used are discussed . A very useful feature of the book are the conclusions and summaries given after some of the topics are discusse d in detail. It wil l serve well the needs of both the researche r actively engaged in plant nutrition studies as well as the teacher seeking material for classroom presentation . With one important exception, the headings into which the subject matter is divided are identical to those of the earlier edition. However, many sections have been completel y revised, and the more recent findings have been added to practicall y all of them. A 30-page section on the "Assessmen t of contamination and the limitations of micronutrient deficiency studies" is a new and valuable addition to the Second Edition. Much of the material which was previousl y reviewed by R. E. Thiers and R. L. Mitchell is included in this section, but the results of some of the studies at Long Ashton are also presented . In the reviewer' s opinion two features of the book could be improved. I found that it took some time to get accustome d to the numbering system used for chapters , sections, and subsections , and the designation of topics in the index in this manner.Search iri g for topics in the text designate d by this numbering system is much slower than finding them by page number designation. A second shortcoming of the book is the kind of binding used. Unless the copy I received was not typical, the pages are not bound securel y and consequentl y wil l pull loose quite readily. I hope this is not generall y true as I believe that the book wil l be subject to heavy use in any laborator y where plant nutrition studies are being conducted.—V. V. Rendig, Dept, of Soils & Plant Nutrition, University of California, Dans.
Journal ArticleDOI

The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology.

O. van Kooten, +1 more
TL;DR: The present "renaissance" of chlorophyll fluorescence may be the product of a fruitful dynamic interaction between three different research disciplines, i.e., basic and applied research linked to new developments in instrumentation and methodology.
Journal ArticleDOI

Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis Induced by Visible Light

TL;DR: In this article, a photo-inhibition from exposure to a high PFD without adding additional additional stress is described, which is caused by interaction between light and other environmental factors.
Related Papers (5)