Real-time structural health monitoring for concrete beams: a cost-effective ‘Industry 4.0’ solution using piezo sensors
read more
Citations
Modeling the Big Data challenges in context of smart cities – an integrated fuzzy ISM-DEMATEL approach
Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring of Agricultural Structures
A Systematic Review of Advanced Sensor Technologies for Non-Destructive Testing and Structural Health Monitoring
Position paper: digital engineering and building information modelling in Australia
Visualization and monitoring information management of bridge structure health and safety early warning based on BIM
References
Overview of Piezoelectric Impedance-Based Health Monitoring and Path Forward
Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0
Hybrid fiber Bragg grating/long period fiber grating sensor for strain/temperature discrimination
Detection and monitoring of hidden fatigue crack growth using a built-in piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: I. Diagnostics
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (16)
Q2. What have the authors stated for future works in "Real-time structural health monitoring for concrete beams: a cost-effective ‘industry 4.0’ solution using piezo sensors" ?
However, this approach being a preliminary scoping study had several limitations and some significant lessons for future studies. The use of wired sensors and its complex and sensitive circuit could potentially lead to delays and damage to devices. Studies investigating the exact range and lifespan of piezoceramic sensors could also further assist in fine-tuning this technique for in ustrial use.
Q3. What is the way to protect the sensors?
As cement continually reacts with water and developstrong bonds between mix components to build the final concrete strength, a protectivelayer is necessary to protect the embedded sensors from its boundary, moisture damage,and corrosion (Sanches et al., 2019).
Q4. What is the role of the piezoceramic element in concrete?
Acting as a sensor, actuator, accelerator ortransducer within the concrete member, the piezoceramic sensors detect the electricalenergy converted from mechanical energy and convert it into a voltage output (Ballasand Schoen 2017).
Q5. What are the limitations of conventional methods?
Acoustic techniques such as the rebound hammer, ultrasonic pulse velocity(UPV), impact echo, spectral wave analysis, crosshole sonic lagging or parallel seismichave various limitations.
Q6. What is the design of the testing frame?
The testing frame is self-supported type andprovide a full circle of loading system, while the loading has been introduced through ahydraulic jack with load cell to monitor the actual applied load.
Q7. What is the ultimate load at which the structures failed?
The ultimate load at which the structures failed was recorded as 88.37 kN , 83.31 kN,78.71 kN and 89.61kN for test samples 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively.
Q8. What are the main uses of piezoceramic sensors?
Piezoceramic sensors have been utilised heavily for SHM in the aircraft industry (Chang2016; Shen et al., 2006), automobile (Martinotto et al., 2016) and manufacturing(Hossain et al., 2016) industries.
Q9. What are the advantages of piezo sensors?
In summary, although piezo elements have limitations of being fragile and non-waterresistant, their economic feasibility and simplicity of usage provide strong arguments forusing them on real-time SHM projects.
Q10. What was the reason for the installation of the sensors?
it was anticipated that because the sensorswill collect data within a range of 20 – 50 mm, they were placed in the region ofexpected large damage on the beam.
Q11. How many Pa/seconds is used to control the beam?
while it has been changed to deflection control of 1 mm/minute at the laterstages to ensure capturing the full load-deflection relationship and to avoid suddenfailure and damages to the instrumentations.
Q12. What is the purpose of this study?
This study investigates the application of low-costpiezoceramic sensors to detect deformations within the concrete structure (i.e., cracksand fractures) due to the member being placed under physical strain.
Q13. What is the significance of the multidisciplinary approach?
The multidisciplinary approach (using Industry 4.0 advanced technologies) adoptedtowards solving an important maintenance issues associated with the constructionindustry has some significant theoretical and managerial implications.
Q14. How many sensors were attached to the beam?
The four beams included 13sensors for each beam with five on the front and rear faces of the beam, one on the baseand two on the top (ref. Fig. 5 and 6).
Q15. What are the main components used in the present study?
The main components used in the present ‘Industry 4.0’ study include: a Raspberry Pi;piezoceramic sensors; a breadboard; analogue to digital converter; and two 16-bitmultiplexers (refer to Figure 2).<Insert Figure 2 about here>
Q16. What are the main limitations of conventional methods?
conventional methods include different tests such as a simple human eyedetection of surface defects (Ghodoosi et al., 2018) or a compressive strength test whichonly provides results after a 28 day curing period (Yildirim et al., 2015).