scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Rebound effect of improved energy efficiency for different energy types: A general equilibrium analysis for China

TLDR
In this article, the authors explored the rebound effect of different energy types in China based on a static computable general equilibrium model and found that improving energy efficiency of using electricity has the largest positive impact on GDP among the five energy types.
About
This article is published in Energy Economics.The article was published on 2017-02-01 and is currently open access. It has received 67 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Rebound effect (conservation) & Primary energy.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

County-level CO2 emissions and sequestration in China during 1997–2017

TL;DR: A particle swarm optimization-back propagation algorithm was employed to unify the scale of DMSP/OLS and NPP/VIIRS satellite imagery and estimate the CO 2 emissions in 2,735 Chinese counties during 1997–2017, and the county-level carbon sequestration value of terrestrial vegetation was calculated.
Journal ArticleDOI

The energy, environmental and economic impacts of carbon tax rate and taxation industry: A CGE based study in China

Boqiang Lin, +1 more
- 15 Sep 2018 - 
TL;DR: In this article, the impact of carbon tax on energy, environment and the economy was analyzed and it was shown that the negative impact of CTS on GDP is acceptable, and the maximum scenario will not exceed 0.5%.
Journal ArticleDOI

What will China's carbon emission trading market affect with only electricity sector involvement? A CGE based study

TL;DR: In this article, the authors established five counter-measured scenarios based on the recently launched China's national carbon trading market and constructed a dynamic recursive Computable General Equilibrium model to study the impact of national ETS on the economy, energy and environment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Energy efficiency and economy-wide rebound effects: A review of the evidence and its implications

TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore the evidence on the size of economy-wide rebound effects and explore whether and how such effects are taken into account within the models used to produce global energy scenarios.
Journal ArticleDOI

Impacts of carbon price level in carbon emission trading market

TL;DR: In this article, the impact of different ETS price level by applying a dynamic recursive Computable General Equilibrium model on energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and the economy is analyzed.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Energy efficiency and consumption — the rebound effect — a survey

TL;DR: In this paper, a review of some of the relevant literature from the US offers definitions and identifies sources including direct, secondary, and economy-wide sources and concludes that the range of estimates for the size of the rebound effect is very low to moderate.
Journal ArticleDOI

Economic Implications of Mandated Efficiency in Standards for Household Appliances

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that the indiscriminate use of mandated standards will backfire, but a mix of selective standards and reliance on prices as a restraint can be effective.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Khazzoom-Brookes Postulate and Neoclassical Growth

TL;DR: In a disturbing assault on intuition and conventional wisdom, Khazzoom and Brookes have asserted that energy efficiency improvements might increase, rather than decrease energy consumption as mentioned in this paper, which would accelerate the need for offshore drilling rather than provide a substitute for it.
Journal ArticleDOI

The greenhouse effect: the fallacies in the energy efficiency solution

Len Brookes
- 01 Mar 1990 - 
TL;DR: The view that widespread improvements in energy efficiency can by themselves do anything to halt the build-up of greenhouse gases around the globe is fundamentally unsound It is based on the same fallacies that underlie the claim that energy savings from improving efficiency can substitute for new energy supply as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Energy policy: The rebound effect is overplayed.

TL;DR: Increasing energy efficiency brings emissions savings and claims that it backfires are a distraction, say Kenneth Gillingham and colleagues.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (18)
Q1. What have the authors contributed in "Rebound effect of improved energy efficiency for different energy types: a general equilibrium analysis for china cama working paper 38/2016 june 2016" ?

This paper explores the rebound effect of different energy types in China based on a static computable general equilibrium model. In addition, the paper points out that the policy makers in China should look at the rebound effect in the long term rather in the short term. 

it is noted that when the inter-fuel substitution is limited, improving the efficiency of using electricity can probably increase the demand of other types of energy, such as crude oil and gas, petroleum and gas supply. 

In their study, improving energy efficiency of using electricity seems the best policy choice as it does not only generate higher GDP relative to the baseline but also incurs lower economy-wide rebound (or even negative rebound). 

Then the economic expansion (the third channel of rebound effect) will further increase the demand of secondary energy goods, which further requires more primary energy inputs as the second round increase of primary energy demand. 

In the long run, however, the capital will flow to other sectors so that the rate of investment return will go back to the normal level, and raise the electricity price by about 6-9 percentage points compared to the short run. 

Most sectors’ outputs expand due to improved energy efficiency, but energy sectors andtheir upstream sectors are major “losers” in terms of output. 

Primary energy goods (coal, crude oil and gas) show larger rebound effect than secondary energy goods (refined petroleum, electricity and gas supply). 

the authors can find that for primary energy, such as coal, crude oil and gas, the long-run total rebound is often larger than the short-run rebound; but the effect just reverses for the secondary energy like electricity & steam supply, gas supply and refined petroleum. 

As Van den Bergh (2011) argued, rebound effect is important for China and energy efficiency policies need to be carefully designed to balance the extent of rebound and the macroeconomic impact. 

considering the small proportion of gas use in China’s total energy consumption, the big rebound effect from gas supply may not have significant impact in terms of absolute total amount. 

The authors note that the short-run rebound is larger than the long-run rebound and the energy efficiency policy has a larger GDP impact in the long run than that in the short run. 

This will lower the electricity consumption compared to the short-run scenario, which makes the long-run rebound smaller than the short-run rebound. 

This paper explores economy-wide rebound effect of China in three dimensions based on a China CGE model: (1) different energy types, including coal, crude oil and gas, refined petroleum, electricity & steam supply and gas supply, (2) long-run versus short-run closure, and (3) inter-fuel substitutability. 

Their results show that improving energy efficiency of using any of the five energy goods will raise GDP, of which increasing energy efficiency of using electricity has the largest positive impact on GDP. 

gas supply shows the largest rebound of all the five energy types although it only accounts for a small proportion in China’s energy consumption. 

According to equation (8), this negative rebound effect is mainly from the production side (RP) while the final consumption shows positive rebound although not big enough to offset the strong energy-saving effect in the production system. 

In terms of rebound effect, there exists no “backfire” effect; however, there is even negative rebound for improving efficiency of using electricity. 

The dramatic difference between the scenario with inter-fuel substitutability and without inter-fuel substitutability implies that the elasticity of substitution between gas supply and other energy inputs is a crucial factor for its rebound effect.