scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

Sequential Minimal Optimization : A Fast Algorithm for Training Support Vector Machines

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The sequential minimal optimization (SMO) algorithm as mentioned in this paper uses a series of smallest possible QP problems to solve a large QP problem, which avoids using a time-consuming numerical QP optimization as an inner loop.
Abstract
This paper proposes a new algorithm for training support vector machines: Sequential Minimal Optimization, or SMO. Training a support vector machine requires the solution of a very large quadratic programming (QP) optimization problem. SMO breaks this large QP problem into a series of smallest possible QP problems. These small QP problems are solved analytically, which avoids using a time-consuming numerical QP optimization as an inner loop. The amount of memory required for SMO is linear in the training set size, which allows SMO to handle very large training sets. Because matrix computation is avoided, SMO scales somewhere between linear and quadratic in the training set size for various test problems, while the standard chunking SVM algorithm scales somewhere between linear and cubic in the training set size. SMO’s computation time is dominated by SVM evaluation, hence SMO is fastest for linear SVMs and sparse data sets. On realworld sparse data sets, SMO can be more than 1000 times faster than the chunking algorithm.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Advances in kernel methods: support vector learning

TL;DR: Support vector machines for dynamic reconstruction of a chaotic system, Klaus-Robert Muller et al pairwise classification and support vector machines, Ulrich Kressel.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

A re-examination of text categorization methods

TL;DR: The results show that SVM, kNN and LLSF signi cantly outperform NNet and NB when the number of positive training instances per category are small, and that all the methods perform comparably when the categories are over 300 instances.
Journal ArticleDOI

Universal approximation using incremental constructive feedforward networks with random hidden nodes

TL;DR: This paper proves in an incremental constructive method that in order to let SLFNs work as universal approximators, one may simply randomly choose hidden nodes and then only need to adjust the output weights linking the hidden layer and the output layer.
Journal ArticleDOI

Support vector machines for spam categorization

TL;DR: The use of support vector machines in classifying e-mail as spam or nonspam is studied by comparing it to three other classification algorithms: Ripper, Rocchio, and boosting decision trees, which found SVM's performed best when using binary features.
References
More filters
Book

The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory

TL;DR: Setting of the learning problem consistency of learning processes bounds on the rate of convergence ofLearning processes controlling the generalization ability of learning process constructing learning algorithms what is important in learning theory?
Journal ArticleDOI

Support-Vector Networks

TL;DR: High generalization ability of support-vector networks utilizing polynomial input transformations is demonstrated and the performance of the support- vector network is compared to various classical learning algorithms that all took part in a benchmark study of Optical Character Recognition.
Book

A wavelet tour of signal processing

TL;DR: An introduction to a Transient World and an Approximation Tour of Wavelet Packet and Local Cosine Bases.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition

TL;DR: There are several arguments which support the observed high accuracy of SVMs, which are reviewed and numerous examples and proofs of most of the key theorems are given.