scispace - formally typeset
Open Access

Sex Differences in

TLDR
In this paper, a study suggests that there are sex differences in vocational attitude maturity, with the relationship being higher for males than for females, and the self-concept variables of self-satisfaction, family, and moral-ethical self were found to contribute to the attitude maturity of males.
Abstract
This study suggests that there are sex differences in vocational attitude maturity. In the four-school stratified sample of eleventh grade boys and girls studied, the girls scored significantly higher than the boys in vocational attitude. No sex differences in overall level of self-esteem, as measured by the Tennessee Self-Concept Scale, were found. For both sexes a significant relationship between the over all level of self-esteem and vocational attitude maturity was indicated, with the relationship being higher for males than for females. The self-concept variables of self-satisfaction, family, and moral-ethical self were found to contribute to the vocational attitude maturity of males. For females, the self-concept variables of identity and moral-ethical self contributed to their vocational attitude maturity.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research.

TL;DR: A meta-analysis of studies that have attempted to longitudinally predict a specific STB-related outcome suggests the need for a shift in focus from risk factors to machine learning-based risk algorithms.
Journal ArticleDOI

Microglia emerge as central players in brain disease.

TL;DR: Recent developments in the rapidly expanding understanding of the function, as well as the dysfunction, of microglia in disorders of the CNS are focused on.
Journal ArticleDOI

The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors meta-analyzed 341 studies published between 1989 and 2014 that reported cross-informant correspondence estimates, and observed low-to-moderate correspondence (mean internalizing: r =.25; mean externalizing: R =.30; mean overall: R.28).
Posted Content

The Validity of the Multi-Informant Approach to Assessing Child and Adolescent Mental Health

TL;DR: This article critically evaluated research on the incremental and construct validity of the multi-informant approach to clinical child and adolescent assessment, and identified crucial gaps in knowledge for future research, and provided recommendations for "best practices" in using and interpreting multi-Informant assessments in clinical work and research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sex Differences in Animal Models: Focus on Addiction

TL;DR: Major quantitative, population, and mechanistic sex differences in the addiction domain are outlined using a heuristic framework of the three established stages of the addiction cycle: binge/intoxication, withdrawal/negative affect, and preoccupation/anticipation.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

“Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician

TL;DR: A simplified, scored form of the cognitive mental status examination, the “Mini-Mental State” (MMS) which includes eleven questions, requires only 5-10 min to administer, and is therefore practical to use serially and routinely.

A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician

TL;DR: The Mini-Mental State (MMS) as mentioned in this paper is a simplified version of the standard WAIS with eleven questions and requires only 5-10 min to administer, and is therefore practical to use serially and routinely.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

TL;DR: It is suggested that the introduction of the scales into general hospital practice would facilitate the large task of detection and management of emotional disorder in patients under investigation and treatment in medical and surgical departments.
Journal ArticleDOI

Meta-Analysis in Clinical Trials*

TL;DR: This paper examines eight published reviews each reporting results from several related trials in order to evaluate the efficacy of a certain treatment for a specified medical condition and suggests a simple noniterative procedure for characterizing the distribution of treatment effects in a series of studies.
Related Papers (5)