Solid acid proton conductors: from laboratory curiosities to fuel cell electrolytes
read more
Citations
Oxide-ion and proton conducting electrolyte materials for clean energy applications: structural and mechanistic features
Anhydrous proton conduction at 150 °C in a crystalline metal–organic framework
Proton-conducting membranes based on benzimidazole polymers for high-temperature PEM fuel cells. A chemical quest
Recent Advances and Challenges of Electrocatalytic N2 Reduction to Ammonia.
Recent developments in proton exchange membranes for fuel cells
References
A Theory of Water and Ionic Solution, with Particular Reference to Hydrogen and Hydroxyl Ions
Solid State Ionics
The Structure and Entropy of Ice and of Other Crystals with Some Randomness of Atomic Arrangement
Solid acids as fuel cell electrolytes
Theory of the Transition in KH2PO4
Related Papers (5)
High-Performance Solid Acid Fuel Cells Through Humidity Stabilization
Solid acids as fuel cell electrolytes
Frequently Asked Questions (10)
Q2. How many hydrogen bond configurations are possible in a hypothetical compound?
By analogy to ice, the number of hydrogen bond configurations possible in this hypothetical compound results from the placement of two protons over six hydrogen positions, modified by the probability (4/6) that any proton site is open or available.
Q3. What is the expected effect of the solid nature of the electrolyte on the fuel cell?
It can further be expected that the solid nature of the electrolyte will ensure zero fuel crossover and thereby enable the use of high concentrations of alcohol in the fuel stream.
Q4. How many configurations of hydrogen bonds can be considered as a transition entropy?
If these sources of disorder were to be considered entirely correlated such that the orientation of the phosphate group entirely fixed the location of hydrogen bonds, then the number of configurations per formula unit would be only 6, implying a transition entropy of only 9.13 J mol 1 K 1, far less than the experimentally measured value of 23 J mol 1 K 1.
Q5. What is the molar configurational entropy of CsH2PO4?
The molar configurational entropy that one would expect to result from the disordered hydrogen bond in CsH2PO4 is Rln(2) = 5.76 J mol 1 K 1.
Q6. How many tetrahedral group orientations are possible for a hydrogen bond?
if only oxygen atoms directly adjacent to a cube face can serve as donors to a bond extending out of that face, then the number of tetrahedral group orientations compatible with ‘L’ type hydrogen bond configurations is only two (Otetr = 2).
Q7. What are some rather profound implications for the proton transport behavior of CsHSO4?
Buried within the modified ‘extended’ ice rules are some rather profound implications for the proton transport behavior of CsHSO4.
Q8. How many tetrahedral group orientations are possible for hydrogen bonds?
for hydrogen bond configurations in which the bonds extend out of opposing faces of the cube, there are four tetrahedral group orientations possible, if one only considers short hydrogen bonds (Otetr = 4).
Q9. What is the sulfate group orientation in the Jirak model?
Other models, however, such as those of Belushkin50 and Merinov51,52 in particular, distinguish between donor and acceptor oxygen atoms, and thus the sulfate group orientation in these structural models is fixed by the location of the hydrogen bonds.
Q10. What is the length of the oxygen neighbor in Fig. 13a?
Each of the oxygen atoms marked with a number sign (#) in Fig. 13a has an oxygen neighbor in the phosphate group that resides directly to the right of the one shown with which a bond of this length could be formed.