scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.

TLDR
The significant, though limited, advantage of directional microphones and the absence of additional significant improvement by a noise reduction algorithm should be considered when fitting open-fit hearing aids.
Abstract
To investigate speech recognition performance in noise with bilateral open-fi t hearing aids and as reference also with closed earmolds, in omnidirectional mode, directional mode, and directional mode in conjunction with noise reduction Design: A within-subject design with repeated measures across conditions was used Speech recognition thresholds in noise were obtained for the different conditions Study sample: Twenty adults without prior experience with hearing aids All had symmetric sensorineural mild hearing loss in the lower frequencies and moderate to severe hearing loss in the higher frequencies Results: Speech recognition performance in noise was not signifi cantly better with an omnidirectional microphone compared to unaided, whereas performance was signifi cantly better with a directional microphone (16 dB with open fi tting and 44 dB with closed earmold) compared to unaided With open fi tting, no signifi cant additional advantage was obtained by combining the directional microphone with a noise reduction algorithm, but with closed earmolds a signifi cant additional advantage of 08 dB was obtained Conclusions: The signifi cant, though limited, advantage of directional microphones and the absence of additional signifi cant improvement by a noise reduction algorithm should be considered when fi tting open-fi t hearing aids

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Why Do Hearing Aids Fail to Restore Normal Auditory Perception

TL;DR: The effects of hearing loss on neural activity is described to illustrate the reasons why current hearing aids are insufficient and to motivate the use of new technologies to explore directions for improving the next generation of devices.
Journal ArticleDOI

Open Versus Closed Hearing-Aid Fittings: A Literature Review of Both Fitting Approaches

TL;DR: The occlusion effect and its consequences for perception while using hearing aids are described, and the advantages and disadvantages of open compared with closed fittings and their impact on the fitting process are addressed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Efficacy of Hearing Aids on the Cognitive Status of Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Hearing Loss: A Multicenter Controlled Randomized Trial.

TL;DR: No significant effect of HA use was observed after 6 months of follow-up in patients with AD and HL and a smaller cognitive decline should be obtained with HA use.
Book ChapterDOI

Hearing Aid Signal Processing

TL;DR: It is concluded that modern hearing aids can be effective in restoring audibility and providing acceptable loudness and listening comfort, but they are still of limited effectiveness in improving the intelligibility of speech in noisy situations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Potential of Augmented Reality Platforms to Improve Individual Hearing Aids and to Support More Ecologically Valid Research.

TL;DR: Suggestions are made about why AR platforms may offer ideal affordances to compensate for hearing loss, and how research-focused AR platforms could help toward better understanding of the role of hearing in everyday life.
References
More filters
Journal Article

Predicting directional hearing aid benefit for individual listeners.

TL;DR: Overall results revealed no significant correlation between the slope of audiometric configuration or amount of high-frequency hearing loss and the benefit obtained from directional microphone hearing instruments, and audiologists should consider the use of directional amplification for patients regardless of audiogram slope, high- frequencies hearing loss, or omnidirectional speech intelligibility score.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quantification of directional benefit across different polar response patterns.

TL;DR: Results indicated that there were no significant differences in the HINT or CST performance, or sound quality judgments, across the four directional microphone conditions when tested in a diffuse field.
Journal ArticleDOI

Hearing aid fitting outcome: clinical application and psychometric properties of a Swedish translation of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA).

TL;DR: The psychometric properties of the present Swedish translation of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids showed resemblance in many aspects to previous reports, but the demographic variables examined could not be used as predictors for the hearing aid fitting outcome.
Journal ArticleDOI

The influence of hearing and age on speech recognition scores in noise in audiological patients and in the general population.

TL;DR: In this article, the influence of pure-tone audiometry and age on the speech recognition score in noise, both in audiological patients and also in a random population sample, was described.
Journal ArticleDOI

Unaided and aided performance with a directional open-fit hearing aid.

TL;DR: For the hearing aids and experimental condition used in this study, a patient would require directional microphones in order to perform significantly better than unaided or aided with omnidirectional microphones, and that performance with an omniddirectional microphone would not be significantlybetter than un aided.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
When was noise fit evolve 2 launched?

The significant, though limited, advantage of directional microphones and the absence of additional significant improvement by a noise reduction algorithm should be considered when fitting open-fit hearing aids.