Stable isotope analysis indicates microalgae as the predominant food source of fauna in a coastal forest stream, south‐east Brazil
read more
Citations
How important are terrestrial organic carbon inputs for secondary production in freshwater ecosystems
A conceptual model of litter breakdown in low order streams
The importance of high-quality algal food sources in stream food webs - current status and future perspectives
Are autochthonous foods more important than allochthonous resources to benthic consumers in tropical headwater streams
Macroinvertebrates: composition, life histories and production
References
The River Continuum Concept
Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions
Stable isotopes in ecosystem studies
Energy Flow in Bear Brook, New Hampshire: An Integrative Approach to Stream Ecosystem Metabolism
Contributions of Benthic Algae to Lake Food Webs as Revealed by Stable Isotope Analysis
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (11)
Q2. What is the potential source of variation in the 13C signature of algae?
A potential source of variation in the δ13C signature of algae was the current velocity of the position in which they were sampled – more depleted signatures are expected in faster-flowing conditions (Finlay et al. 1999, Finlay 2004).
Q3. How many transects were used to collect litter?
To collect litter, the authors set up four equidistant transects of 1 m width from one stream margin to the other, perpendicular to the thalweg in all sites, and collected all litter within the transect.
Q4. What is the main reason for the importance of algae in forested streams?
The importance of litter as a food source of forested streams is coupled to the limitation of autochthonous production cause by shading of the forest (Vannote et al. 1980); lack of aquatic production due to light limitation induces consumers to use the available allochthonous resource.
Q5. How did the authors convert the turbidity and fluorescence of the sample?
The authors read the turbidity and fluorescence of the sample in a hand-held fluorimeter (Aquafluor 8000, Turner Instruments, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and converted the turbidity to dry mass and fluorescence to chlorophyll using known relationships.
Q6. How much periphyton biomass was produced in the absence of grazing?
The dynamics of carbon flow are beyond the scope of the present study, but the authors can note that the rate of production of periphyton biomass at Mãe D´água was approximately 1 g/m2/day in the absence of grazing (Moulton et al. 2004).
Q7. What is the role of shredding invertebrates in processing the material?
Aligned with the question of allochthonous input in forested streams is the role of shredding invertebrates in processing the material and incorporating it into the food chain.
Q8. What is the likely source of the observed pattern?
Plants with C4 metabolism are a common enriched source in tropical systems (Bunn et al. 1997, Clapcott & Bunn 2003, Hamilton et al. 1992), but the authors consider C4 plants as an unlikely source to explain the observed pattern.
Q9. How many sites were collected for stable isotope analysis?
The authors collected samples for stable isotope analysis in early February 2002 in four locations in a 330 m stretch from approximately 40 to 80 m asl (Table 1).
Q10. How much of the leaf mass was reduced in Córrego da Andorinha?
measurements of leaf processing in Córrego da Andorinha and Rio Barra Pequena showed substantial breakdown; leaf mass was reduced to 28 % of original mass in 32 days (Moulton & Magalhães 2003).
Q11. How long did Learned (2000) recommend the stream be re-used?
Learned (2000) also pointed out that biological processing of the litter may be reduced by short retention time in streams in Hawaii.