System-wide profiling of genes and proteins in mammalian cells produce lists of differentially expressed genes/proteins that need to be further analyzed for their collective functions in order to extract new knowledge. Once unbiased lists of genes or proteins are generated from such experiments, these lists are used as input for computing enrichment with existing lists created from prior knowledge organized into gene-set libraries. While many enrichment analysis tools and gene-set libraries databases have been developed, there is still room for improvement. Here, we present Enrichr, an integrative web-based and mobile software application that includes new gene-set libraries, an alternative approach to rank enriched terms, and various interactive visualization approaches to display enrichment results using the JavaScript library, Data Driven Documents (D3). The software can also be embedded into any tool that performs gene list analysis. We applied Enrichr to analyze nine cancer cell lines by comparing their enrichment signatures to the enrichment signatures of matched normal tissues. We observed a common pattern of up regulation of the polycomb group PRC2 and enrichment for the histone mark H3K27me3 in many cancer cell lines, as well as alterations in Toll-like receptor and interlukin signaling in K562 cells when compared with normal myeloid CD33+ cells. Such analyses provide global visualization of critical differences between normal tissues and cancer cell lines but can be applied to many other scenarios. Enrichr is an easy to use intuitive enrichment analysis web-based tool providing various types of visualization summaries of collective functions of gene lists. Enrichr is open source and freely available online at: http://amp.pharm.mssm.edu/Enrichr
 .

background

/pdf/enrichr-interactive-and-collaborative-html5-gene-list-1dn7g68rn1.pdf

Studies in statistical ecology spatial pattern

Enrichr: Interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool

but since logging operations and the burning and reburning that followed this logging, aspen and white birch have taken over the role as dominants. Thirty-two islands and 5 mainland areas were chosen for the study. Three species of hibernators, Eutamias minimum, Tamias striatus and Zapus hudsonias were taken on the mainland with only the Zapus being found on the islands. All six of the non-hibernating species taken were found on the islands. These include Microtus pennsylvanicus, Synaptomys cooper, Clethrionomys gapperi, Peromyscus rncaniculatus, Blarina brevicauda and Sorex cinereus. The degree of occupancy changed from 4 out of 21 islands in 1950 to 21 of 24 islands in 1952. Along with this increase in the proportion of islands occupied there was an increase in the number of species found on most of the islands although the average number of species found on each occupied island did not change appreciably. This increase in islands occupied was correlated with an increase in the density of the mainland populations. The water seemed to be an efficient barrier to travel during the summer but the ice of winter became a highway for dispersal of the various nonhibernating species in the winter. Considerable difference was found in the vulnerability of the several species to trapping. The Perornyscus were readily caught. The Clethrionomys were not as easy to capture as the former but were still readily taken. The Microtus, however, posed a different problem. They were difficult to capture and on two islands of about 2.2 and 4 acres respectively we were not able to elim-inate them after 16 days of trapping on a 15-foot grid. The populations of small mammals fluctuate quite widely and the several populations appear to be somewhat independent of each other. The islands appeared to lag behind the mainland in the development of their populations.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/1931034.pdf

Distance to Nearest Neighbor as a Measure of Spatial Relationships in Populations

Preface.Acknowledgments.1 Introduction.1.1 Why Spatial Data in Public Health?1.2 Why Statistical Methods for Spatial Data?1.3 Intersection of Three Fields of Study.1.4 Organization of the Book.2 Analyzing Public Health Data.2.1 Observational vs. Experimental Data.2.2 Risk and Rates.2.2.1 Incidence and Prevalence.2.2.2 Risk.2.2.3 Estimating Risk: Rates and Proportions.2.2.4 Relative and Attributable Risks.2.3 Making Rates Comparable: Standardized Rates.2.3.1 Direct Standardization.2.3.2 Indirect Standardization.2.3.3 Direct or Indirect?2.3.4 Standardizing to What Standard?2.3.5 Cautions with Standardized Rates.2.4 Basic Epidemiological Study Designs.2.4.1 Prospective Cohort Studies.2.4.2 Retrospective Case-Control Studies.2.4.3 Other Types of Epidemiological Studies.2.5 Basic Analytic Tool: The Odds Ratio.2.6 Modeling Counts and Rates.2.6.1 Generalized Linear Models.2.6.2 Logistic Regression.2.6.3 Poisson Regression.2.7 Challenges in the Analysis of Observational Data.2.7.1 Bias.2.7.2 Confounding.2.7.3 Effect Modification.2.7.4 Ecological Inference and the Ecological Fallacy.2.8 Additional Topics and Further Reading.2.9 Exercises.3 Spatial Data.3.1 Components of Spatial Data.3.2 An Odyssey into Geodesy.3.2.1 Measuring Location: Geographical Coordinates.3.2.2 Flattening the Globe: Map Projections and Coordinate Systems.3.2.3 Mathematics of Location: Vector and Polygon Geometry.3.3 Sources of Spatial Data.3.3.1 Health Data.3.3.2 Census-Related Data.3.3.3 Geocoding.3.3.4 Digital Cartographic Data.3.3.5 Environmental and Natural Resource Data.3.3.6 Remotely Sensed Data.3.3.7 Digitizing.3.3.8 Collect Your Own!3.4 Geographic Information Systems.3.4.1 Vector and Raster GISs.3.4.2 Basic GIS Operations.3.4.3 Spatial Analysis within GIS.3.5 Problems with Spatial Data and GIS.3.5.1 Inaccurate and Incomplete Databases.3.5.2 Confidentiality.3.5.3 Use of ZIP Codes.3.5.4 Geocoding Issues.3.5.5 Location Uncertainty.4 Visualizing Spatial Data.4.1 Cartography: The Art and Science of Mapmaking.4.2 Types of Statistical Maps.MAP STUDY: Very Low Birth Weights in Georgia Health Care District 9.4.2.1 Maps for Point Features.4.2.2 Maps for Areal Features.4.3 Symbolization.4.3.1 Map Generalization.4.3.2 Visual Variables.4.3.3 Color.4.4 Mapping Smoothed Rates and Probabilities.4.4.1 Locally Weighted Averages.4.4.2 Nonparametric Regression.4.4.3 Empirical Bayes Smoothing.4.4.4 Probability Mapping.4.4.5 Practical Notes and Recommendations.CASE STUDY: Smoothing New York Leukemia Data.4.5 Modifiable Areal Unit Problem.4.6 Additional Topics and Further Reading.4.6.1 Visualization.4.6.2 Additional Types of Maps.4.6.3 Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis.4.6.4 Other Smoothing Approaches.4.6.5 Edge Effects.4.7 Exercises.5 Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns.5.1 Types of Patterns.5.2 Spatial Point Processes.5.2.1 Stationarity and Isotropy.5.2.2 Spatial Poisson Processes and CSR.5.2.3 Hypothesis Tests of CSR via Monte Carlo Methods.5.2.4 Heterogeneous Poisson Processes.5.2.5 Estimating Intensity Functions.DATA BREAK: Early Medieval Grave Sites.5.3 K Function.5.3.1 Estimating the K Function.5.3.2 Diagnostic Plots Based on the K Function.5.3.3 Monte Carlo Assessments of CSR Based on the K Function.DATA BREAK: Early Medieval Grave Sites.5.3.4 Roles of First- and Second-Order Properties.5.4 Other Spatial Point Processes.5.4.1 Poisson Cluster Processes.5.4.2 Contagion/Inhibition Processes.5.4.3 Cox Processes.5.4.4 Distinguishing Processes.5.5 Additional Topics and Further Reading.5.6 Exercises.6 Spatial Clusters of Health Events: Point Data for Cases and Controls.6.1 What Do We Have? Data Types and Related Issues.6.2 What Do We Want? Null and Alternative Hypotheses.6.3 Categorization of Methods.6.4 Comparing Point Process Summaries.6.4.1 Goals.6.4.2 Assumptions and Typical Output.6.4.3 Method: Ratio of Kernel Intensity Estimates.DATA BREAK: Early Medieval Grave Sites.6.4.4 Method: Difference between K Functions.DATA BREAK: Early Medieval Grave Sites.6.5 Scanning Local Rates.6.5.1 Goals.6.5.2 Assumptions and Typical Output.6.5.3 Method: Geographical Analysis Machine.6.5.4 Method: Overlapping Local Case Proportions.DATA BREAK: Early Medieval Grave Sites.6.5.5 Method: Spatial Scan Statistics.DATA BREAK: Early Medieval Grave Sites.6.6 Nearest-Neighbor Statistics.6.6.1 Goals.6.6.2 Assumptions and Typical Output.6.6.3 Method: q Nearest Neighbors of Cases.CASE STUDY: San Diego Asthma.6.7 Further Reading.6.8 Exercises.7 Spatial Clustering of Health Events: Regional Count Data.7.1 What Do We Have and What Do We Want?7.1.1 Data Structure.7.1.2 Null Hypotheses.7.1.3 Alternative Hypotheses.7.2 Categorization of Methods.7.3 Scanning Local Rates.7.3.1 Goals.7.3.2 Assumptions.7.3.3 Method: Overlapping Local Rates.DATA BREAK: New York Leukemia Data.7.3.4 Method: Turnbull et al.'s CEPP.7.3.5 Method: Besag and Newell Approach.7.3.6 Method: Spatial Scan Statistics.7.4 Global Indexes of Spatial Autocorrelation.7.4.1 Goals.7.4.2 Assumptions and Typical Output.7.4.3 Method: Moran's I .7.4.4 Method: Geary's c.7.5 Local Indicators of Spatial Association.7.5.1 Goals.7.5.2 Assumptions and Typical Output.7.5.3 Method: Local Moran's I.7.6 Goodness-of-Fit Statistics.7.6.1 Goals.7.6.2 Assumptions and Typical Output.7.6.3 Method: Pearson's chi2.7.6.4 Method: Tango's Index.7.6.5 Method: Focused Score Tests of Trend.7.7 Statistical Power and Related Considerations.7.7.1 Power Depends on the Alternative Hypothesis.7.7.2 Power Depends on the Data Structure.7.7.3 Theoretical Assessment of Power.7.7.4 Monte Carlo Assessment of Power.7.7.5 Benchmark Data and Conditional Power Assessments.7.8 Additional Topics and Further Reading.7.8.1 Related Research Regarding Indexes of Spatial Association.7.8.2 Additional Approaches for Detecting Clusters and/or Clustering.7.8.3 Space-Time Clustering and Disease Surveillance.7.9 Exercises.8 Spatial Exposure Data.8.1 Random Fields and Stationarity.8.2 Semivariograms.8.2.1 Relationship to Covariance Function and Correlogram.8.2.2 Parametric Isotropic Semivariogram Models.8.2.3 Estimating the Semivariogram.DATA BREAK: Smoky Mountain pH Data.8.2.4 Fitting Semivariogram Models.8.2.5 Anisotropic Semivariogram Modeling.8.3 Interpolation and Spatial Prediction.8.3.1 Inverse-Distance Interpolation.8.3.2 Kriging.CASE STUDY: Hazardous Waste Site Remediation.8.4 Additional Topics and Further Reading.8.4.1 Erratic Experimental Semivariograms.8.4.2 Sampling Distribution of the Classical Semivariogram Estimator.8.4.3 Nonparametric Semivariogram Models.8.4.4 Kriging Non-Gaussian Data.8.4.5 Geostatistical Simulation.8.4.6 Use of Non-Euclidean Distances in Geostatistics.8.4.7 Spatial Sampling and Network Design.8.5 Exercises.9 Linking Spatial Exposure Data to Health Events.9.1 Linear Regression Models for Independent Data.9.1.1 Estimation and Inference.9.1.2 Interpretation and Use with Spatial Data.DATA BREAK: Raccoon Rabies in Connecticut.9.2 Linear Regression Models for Spatially Autocorrelated Data.9.2.1 Estimation and Inference.9.2.2 Interpretation and Use with Spatial Data.9.2.3 Predicting New Observations: Universal Kriging.DATA BREAK: New York Leukemia Data.9.3 Spatial Autoregressive Models.9.3.1 Simultaneous Autoregressive Models.9.3.2 Conditional Autoregressive Models.9.3.3 Concluding Remarks on Conditional Autoregressions.9.3.4 Concluding Remarks on Spatial Autoregressions.9.4 Generalized Linear Models.9.4.1 Fixed Effects and the Marginal Specification.9.4.2 Mixed Models and Conditional Specification.9.4.3 Estimation in Spatial GLMs and GLMMs.DATA BREAK: Modeling Lip Cancer Morbidity in Scotland.9.4.4 Additional Considerations in Spatial GLMs.CASE STUDY: Very Low Birth Weights in Georgia Health Care District 9.9.5 Bayesian Models for Disease Mapping.9.5.1 Hierarchical Structure.9.5.2 Estimation and Inference.9.5.3 Interpretation and Use with Spatial Data.9.6 Parting Thoughts.9.7 Additional Topics and Further Reading.9.7.1 General References.9.7.2 Restricted Maximum Likelihood Estimation.9.7.3 Residual Analysis with Spatially Correlated Error Terms.9.7.4 Two-Parameter Autoregressive Models.9.7.5 Non-Gaussian Spatial Autoregressive Models.9.7.6 Classical/Bayesian GLMMs.9.7.7 Prediction with GLMs.9.7.8 Bayesian Hierarchical Models for Spatial Data.9.8 Exercises.References.Author Index.Subject Index.

/pdf/applied-spatial-statistics-for-public-health-data-5e3go3weys.pdf

Applied Spatial Statistics for Public Health Data

It is evident that organisms have aggregated, patchy distributions of abundance on a wide variety of space and time scales. This can easily be seen in the terrestrial and littoral environments. It has been more difficult to observe in the pelagic realm simply because we cannot see into the ocean. Thus we must depend upon sampling to gain an impression of the space-time scales of pattern in this habitat. Despite the difficulties, enough sampling of the right sort has now been done so that we can make some very general statements about the nature of pattern in the ocean, particularly with regard to pattern in the distribution and abundance of planktonic organisms. All the evidence indicates that plankton is patchy on a broad spectrum of scales. Because this aggregated spatial pattern is such a general phenomenon, there is little question of its ecological and evolutionary importance. Further, because we assume our samples represent a larger universe, patchiness strongly affects our efforts to obtain estimates of the abundance of organisms and our ability to detect significant spatial and temporal changes in abundance. It is therefore of great importance that we understand its nature, causes, and effects.

Studies in statistical ecology spatial pattern

Citations

Enrichr: Interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool

Distance to Nearest Neighbor as a Measure of Spatial Relationships in Populations

Applied Spatial Statistics for Public Health Data

Patterns and Processes in the Time-Space Scales of Plankton Distributions

A new regression method for analyzing the aggregation pattern of animal populations

Related Papers (5)

Distance to Nearest Neighbor as a Measure of Spatial Relationships in Populations

Spatial statistics

Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns

Sampling theory of the negative binomial and logarithmic series distributions.

Fitting the Negative Binomial Distribution to Biological Data